• mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Not in America they’re not.

    Which fucking sucks! The selection of electric cars on sale in America is terrible!

      • stumu415@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        33 minutes ago

        Yes. You can get cheap EV’s here for this price, like the BYD seagull. But most standard EV’s like sedan or SUV start more around the 200000 RMB MARK or 30.000 US$.

        Like the Xiaomi SU7 that the Ford CEO is driving, is around the US$45.000. But it’s an amazing car. There is nothing in the US or Europe that can compare. I personally prefer the Xiaomi YU7.

        Last month I was in Europe and rented an Audi A3 sport, and that didn’t even have rear view cameras or GPS!! The newest Maestro (car brand from Huawei), has an espresso machine built in.

    • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Despite having cases of car makers that receive subsidies handouts from EU countries and then leave anyway to produce in China or elsewhere, Belgium just gave Volkswagen 119 million.
      Let’s see how long it lasts.

  • forkDestroyer@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t understand. Using Elon in charge of Tesla? How can it be failing? I thought he was a genius and not just some guy that had a profitable company partly in thanks to all the carbon credits being sold?

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    People …READ. 75% of all EVs in the USA is a whopping 5% of total sales.

    No one in most countries can fit US tanks on their roads.

  • Mediocre_Bard_Redeux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh no! Is it time for the auto industry to collapse, get 81 billion dollars, change nothing, and berate the American consumer for being too poor to buy their cars that now cost twice as much for no specific reason other than capitalism again?

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      After getting that $88 billion bailout They’ll bring back sedans and start researching EVs…for about 4 years and switch back to gas guzzling jacked up overcompensating trucks for the men and big suburbans/yukons for the moms who pay more attention to their phones than the road.

      Rinse repeat

      • Trampampoline@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        they’ll bring back sedans

        Dodge: here’s your Dart

        Chevy: here’s another Cobalt clone that uses a worse motor

        Ford: We’ll make any Sedan you want as long as it’s a Mustang and not a sedan

        “th-thanks…” 😕

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          In the states, certainly. Countries in Europe have done a much better job, and they’ve even reaped a dividend as a result. Spain, Germany, France, even Italy generate economic growth when they roll out new lines where they want to see more development or expand traffic into popular city centers.

          Biggest self-inflicted wound the UK did to itself to date was nixing the HS2 Northern Leg. Similarly, in the states, Houston/Dallas got royally fucked when the HSR connecting those two big metropoles got axed. Dallas is supposed to be gearing up as the NYC of the Gulf Coast. But it’s impossible to get people into or out of town except through their maxed-out airports and clogged highways.

    • jispal01@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nah. When reelecting Trump, America acknowledged that our country will collapse with the oil industry. We’ll fight a war to preserve our hegemony over oil, and the resultant oil crisis will be the final straw that gets everybody else in the rest of the world that have money to buy a new vehicle committed to electrification.

      It is the Iron Law of Institutions in macro scale. The oil industry and American car companies would rather see America suffer and lose its position in the world, than to help facilitate a transition to some other energy source that would threaten their own entrenched power.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        When reelecting Trump, America acknowledged that our country will collapse with the oil industry.

        If you look where Trump (really, any Republicans) win big, it’s inevitably an area with a big O&G footprint.

        Of late, that’s shifted slightly to Tech Data Centers. But the nature of lucrative extractionary industry is that it gives you a ton of money to pay one half of the working class to restrain and abuse the other half.

        It is the Iron Law of Institutions in macro scale. The oil industry and American car companies would rather see America suffer and lose its position in the world, than to help facilitate a transition to some other energy source that would threaten their own entrenched power.

        My dad worked for Exxon. He used to joke that they had a big switch in the back of the HQ that read “Green Energy”. And as soon as fossil fuels stopped being profitable, they’d flip it and become a solar/wind giant overnight.

        He died back in the 90s, so he never got to see the big milestones. But if you ever look up T. Boone Pickens, this oil billionaire was saying very much the same thing in the late '00s. Natural gas is temporary. Wind is where the real infinite money machine lives.

        And now my own state of Texas leads the county in wind production and runs a tight second to California on solar.

        So much of this is absolutely already happening. And it’s being financed by the same folks who said it was impossible twenty years ago.

  • GhostFace@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    Does it really matter? Won’t the government just block all Chinese vehicles from being sold here so carmakers in this country don’t have to compete?

  • Folstar@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    US auto makers were too busy doing stock buybacks and building Canyoneros while the Chinese were building next gen factories and investing in battery technology. The Chinese government has subsidized their auto industry to dominate the EV market while the USA subsidizes their auto industry but with wild and often stupid swings in expectations.

  • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    If I could ever get a decent, affordable electric car, maybe I’ll start driving again. Maybe. Still hate cars and trucks.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Don’t forget union busting and a general failure to pay workers enough to afford their products. Billionaires’ greed always fucks us over.

    End of the day, I can’t afford a new car no matter who makes it. $30,000 for a DRM’ed shitbox that will shut itself down if I’m 30 minutes late on a payment? No, thanks.

    • fishy@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Seriously. I keep telling my dudes to hold onto their 2005-15 models. Good safety tech, maybe a Bluetooth audio connection and no fucking microphones or cameras.

      As it stands I’ll just keep my 2012 bmw 128 running forever. It’s paid off, fun, and has never given me a problem.

          • 7101334@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Mine is like semi-manual or something? I can change from automatic to manual basically.

            …I still havent learned how to actually use the manual driving BUT I COULD SOMEDAY

            • fishy@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Yeah a lot of automatics have a manual shifting mode, but the crz actually has a 3 pedal manual option. It’s the only manual hybrid I’m aware of.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    The auto industry collapsed a long time ago and they stopped listening to consumers about the same time. Now only foreign cars are manufactured in the US.

  • Aneorthisio@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    One of the most hubristic miscalculations of the 20th century was the Western managerial class in the 1980s and 1990s assuming that globalization would permanently consign developing nations to the manufacturing of cheap plastic junk while domestic blue collar jobs were offshore.

    The higher ups in Western corporations operated under the arrogant delusion that their own expertise would forever remain insulated from global competition. They fundamentally failed to foresee that the very countries they relegated to the bottom of the ladder would inevitably ascend the complexity and cognitive value chains.

    The same market forces that the managerial class so eagerly unleashed upon others starting in the 1980s are now beginning to affect their own bottom line, and suddenly what was once championed as “optimization” and “the future” as they dismantled the livelihood of the working class, has become a crisis. It serves them right, how it bites back.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      One of the most hubristic miscalculations of the 20th century was the Western managerial class in the 1980s and 1990s assuming that globalization would permanently consign developing nations to the manufacturing of cheap plastic junk while domestic blue collar jobs were offshore.

      I don’t think it was a hubristic assumption so much as an engineered economic plan.

      When you look at our history of sanction and regime change, the countries we love to target are the ones that won’t comply with this model. Doubly so, the ones we outright invade.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    That was a blatant choice to back old fossil fuel money against alternative forms of energy. Nobody made trouble for them. They made trouble for themselves. It’ll always happen when you pray at the temple of capitalism.

  • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    There is a legitimate reason to not want Chinese government subsidized cars to undercut American auto makers, but it’s also correct to say that American automakers can’t compete with Chinese automakers right now even if they were in a similar cost footing.

    It’s hard to feel bad when GM intentionally killed electrics back in the 90s, the ship where America leads the world in EV production may have already sailed then. We may yet see the American auto industry have its Kodak moment.

    • Horsey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s no reason to be protective over the auto industry. The years where auto plants could transition to weapons fabrication are over; the manufacturing process has become specialized to chase efficiency. If anything, it’s justice should American car brands go out of business, because they were subsidized and propped up time and time again and stole the money given to them to afford innovation. Most recently in 2010, when American cars lost in the marketplace because they didn’t match hybrid efficiency, they simply did not meet or exceed their competition. Instead, they sat on their asses, took the bailouts, and the Japanese sold better cars. Now, Japanese cars are losing to Chinese cars, while still maintaining superiority over American cars.

      Anecdotally, the newest gen Ford Bronco, Explorer, and F150 ICE cars are terrible. I got to daily drive all of them while my Lightning was in the shop for repairs because they couldn’t loan an EV. Those cars were noisy, slow, awfully designed interiors, inefficient, and just plain cost more than the competition.

      • Strider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Same in Germany. Took the money, took subsidies and did nothing to innovate. Now they earn to get out of business (but we’re fucked since the state owns some of it and made us dependant).

        • Jiral@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          That is not entirely true. The new VW ID.Polo is a very nice new compact EV for a reasonable price for example.

          • Strider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Do you remember how vw betrayed us and the environment? You might argue everyone did that, which is true. Does not make it better though.

            Too little too late.

            • Jiral@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              17 hours ago

              I remember that very well. Doesn’t change anything about the ID.Polo being a great car for a competitive price tag. Chinese cars in Europe aren’t much better priced.

              • Strider@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                Fair point, I can agree on different opinion here. For me with that VW is not a company I will do any (direct) business with, as in deal breaker. In contrast to the US we also have not been reimbursed any loss (which I coincidentally directly had, selling a diesel).

      • Pungent Llama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        America has a toxic masculinity problem. Americans keep buying giant trucks and SUV and Jeeps. GM did put out some legit hybrids and EVs like Volt, Bolt EV, EUVs. But didn’t sell enough. So we are stuck with shitty gas guzzling cars that keeps getting bigger and bigger.

        • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          America has a toxic masculinity problem.

          Yeah the “manly dude” starter pack’s cornerstone is a f-150 or silverado. It’s just a baseline requirement.

          Also though, mom has to have a canyonero to get groceries and shuttle the kids because “mama bear needs to keep her kids safe from all those giant cars out there”.

          • taj@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I don’t even drive anymore, but I hate the American insistence on BIG vehicles. I loved my Prius, Prius V and Civics. They were all great cars. My kids have an older Fit and it’s a fantastic little car. If only it came in electric!! Or was sold at ALL in the USA, ffs

            • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              17 hours ago

              American vehicles are way too big even by my standards, but the cars you listed, I would have a hard time getting into or out of the rear seat. Gotta be at least mid-size and up for me.

      • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        For starters the 300,000+ people employed by those two companies (Chevy is GM). Perhaps you meant to include Stellantis (Chrysler) which would make that number closer to 600,000 people. The auto industry was a big driver of the 2008 crash.

        That’s before we even start to get into the issues stemming from a Chinese monopoly on the auto industry. What happens if American, Japanese, and European auto makers go out of business and then China stops the subsidies? We will literally be in the same situation we are now but with money going to China instead of paying domestic workers.

        • Toga77@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          So what.

          Protecting them from china and bailing them out multiple times hasn’t done anything.

          It’s almost like poorly run businesses SHOULD FAIL.

          Are we a free market capitalist society or not?

        • BrickEater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Idk, as I said before sounds like everyone Big Mad because China is better at capitalism than the west. We could easily sell vehicles for cheaper costs by producing closer to local markets and making simpler cars. But then the corps wouldn’t keep their over inflated stock prices.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I agree, western automakers could easily lower prices.

            1. Get rid of unions

            2. Lower wages in auto manufacturing AND every industry in the supply chain (mining, etc).

            3. Every country that manufactures cars needs to mine and produce its own materials (may need to create more humans to work these industries)

            The engineers and designers at BYD make less money than assembly line workers in Germany or the US.

        • taj@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes, and? They’ve been propped up by the USA govt for decades. If they can’t compete with China or Japan, that’s their own damned fault.

      • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ford and GM are only a fraction of the auto industry in the US. The majority of sales are foreign brands, but none of them can compete as companies against the entire nation of China and its willingness to put them all out of business and takeover said auto industry. They own the mines, materials, and labor and have bottomless pockets to subsidize their vehicles and dell them well below cost.

        How is any company supposed to compete against that?

        • BrickEater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          By maybe not massively inflating the price of their cars and manufacturing their vehicles closer to local markets? Like idk what to tell you, it just sounds like youre mad because china is better at capitalism lol

          • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            How much should these cars be selling for then? Can you give me a breakdown with your expert knowledge? Can you also explain why it is that every automaker in the world outside of China is participating in this alleged price fixing scheme rather than undercutting each other?

            How many cars are being built far outside their local markets? What ones specifically? How much is this adding to the cost of these vehicles?

            Let’s see some actual facts.

        • msage@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Make better products?

          Like every car from not China sucks hard, but they keep going on about prices.

          None of them ever tried to make good cars.

          Then yoy can get comparatively better cars for much cheaper? It’s not like you have much of a choice.

          • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Lol this is a very naive, internet-brained take. Have you actually driven all these cars along with their Chinese counterparts? What makes every non-Chinese car suck so badly exactly? Is it because they’re not selling $60k cars for $15k?

            • msage@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              Who wants 60k car full of surveillance and badly designed tech?

              Slate had the right idea, but Bezos is involved, so we will see.

              But every major brand has lost the plot a decade ago, they all took massive amounts of money from government and did fuck all with it and gobbled each other up. Now they act shocked that people prefer anything other than the 6 brands that remained.

              • PartiallyApplied@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                I agree that Slate has an interesting idea but they have an uphill battle with the marketing. Unfortunately, the US, to a great extent, particularly the rural US, sees electric cars as being “more tech”, which they equate with more frustration. Naturally EVs actually could likely have simpler computer systems than ICE cars, but, for instance Tesla chose to slap a huge iPad in their cars when consumers want dials.

                For all the technical superiority of EVs, it’s hard to convince the average person that they should drive a novel looking “high-tech” vehicle, when a Toyota Camry is an easily available, affordable option. Most people with F150s don’t need them, they want them. Slate isn’t competing for those people, it’s competing for the people who buy Impreza’s, Corollas, and Camrys. I’m not sure it’ll work out.

                For an industrial on-site work truck for running errands, I’d bet they sell like hot cakes, but that’s a much smaller market.