• Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    One minute beyond the deadline they will announce, “mitch was visiting the ole’ Kentucky explosion factory today, not being a closeted homosexual, and in a freak accident, he exploded. So we’re all super bummed that there can’t be an autopsy now… Even if there could be of course, the results would just say he was definitely straight, and he was not dead for a month before his corpse living body was deliberately accidentally exploded.”

  • bassgirl09@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Any company would have likely fired the guy for not showing up by now unless he submitted FMLA paperwork. This is one of the differences between regular working people and these government officials.

  • hraegsvelmir@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    18 hours ago

    You know he isn’t going to resign, even if he is, somehow, still alive. Instead of pussyfooting about the matter like this, I’d rather they stop wasting time and explore avenues to expel him from Congress, unless McConnell can make an in person appearance and satisfy questions as to whether he is still fit to serve in his office. Instead, I can’t help but feel like this will be slow-walked until days before the deadline to determine if there will be a special election to replace him, and then we’ll get a week of Dems wringing their hands going “Oh, however were we meant to know we couldn’t complete a process that is guaranteed to be slowed down as much as possible by our Republican colleagues in Congress in just the 3 days we left ourselves before we started acting like we were taking this matter seriously?”

    How many times are we going to see them run this same play, only for it to blow up in their faces when their master plan requires the Republicans to act with sincerity and honesty, even when it would be disadvantageous for the GOP to do so? We literally saw it play out with the very man in question being a two-faced shit as soon as he sniffed a chance to steal a Supreme Court nomination from the Obama administration? We saw it again with investigations into Trump’s criminal behavior that, honestly, should have had him already sentenced in multiple cases and serving time before he even had the chance to run for a second time. Just assume the Republicans are lying through their teeth, and go scorched earth with a campaign to forcefully oust McConnell from office. Or take them at their word and make stupid demands you know McConnell would ignore if he were alive, and just make it that much clearer for us all that the Democrats are not sincere in their opposition to the agenda of the GOP.

  • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    He’s passed on! This senator is no more! He has ceased to be! He’s expired and gone to meet his maker! He’s a stiff! Bereft of life, he rests in peace! If they hadn’t nailed him to the hospital bed he’d be pushing up the daisies! His metabolic processes are now history! He’s off the twig! He’s kicked the bucket, he’s shuffled off his mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the choir invisible!! HE IS AN EX-SENATOR!!

  • CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    18 hours ago

    No, not a health update that he can lie about. Live public appearance where he speaks and answers questions for at least 30 minutes. Anything less should lead to a resignation.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 day ago

    Beshear should just call their bluff, and name a Democratic Senator. Force MAGA to sue to stop him, and then they’ll have to provide proof of life. If they do, then fine, Mitch is still breathing, so they win.

    But if they can’t prove it, or choose not to, then Beshear’s pick stands, and we’ve got another Dem senator.

    Go ahead, call their bluff. You know they’re lying, they’re ALWAYS lying.

      • wookiepedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Quite the opposite. The state constitution says replacements are appointed. Recent legislation that has not (yet) been tested in court calls for a special election.

        • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I think that a honest court would strike down the legislation, especially if McConnel is revealed to be a corpse. The GOP are malicious liars.

  • glance@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 day ago

    I always figured that if you didn’t show up to work for a few weeks, that was a resignation. We should treat him as if he’s already resigned.

    • whereitsat@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      where i come from if you don’t show up to work for 2-3 days, you’re fired. you’d think the snobby fucks lecturing every american about personal responsibility would be able to at least pretend that they’re maintaining a high standard.

      why is this freeloader even getting free healthcare at this point?

      wheel him out onto the street like the bum that he is and let god deal with it.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Need age caps – or at the very least – a rigorous cognitive and physical assessment from a panel of independent medical experts after retirement age that is made COMPLETELY public (because you’re a public servant, after all), annually.

    It’s too much of a national security risk to have these geriatrics in office. I mean they’re easily-scammed by phishing emails and scam phone calls. Dementia is a high risk at that age. Sudden strokes, heart attacks, or sudden aneurysms as in Graham’s case are too much of a liability.

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The problem isn’t age, it’s entrenchment and corruption. Being old in office is a side effect, not the main problem.

      We need term limits for Congress. If we had term limits, the only way an old person could get into office is if they were voted in when they were old. Being old doesn’t necessarily make one incompetent.

      Congress makes national policy that affects all of us, but only a few people in each state vote for or against them. There should be some safeguard against them remaining in office for decades.

      Term limits for Congress.

      • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Why not both age and term limits? The way I see it, they act as filtering layers that help remove problems. If one fails, the other might do the trick.

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        The problem is that there are multiple problems, and some of the solutions aren’t close to the root cause. I’ll try my best to explain.

        One can say that age alone isn’t the problem; it’s corruption. I’d personally say the problem isn’t term-limits; it’s the ignorance of the electorate in discerning who is ready to go.

        Yes, Sanders is an outlier that proves that old age isn’t always a problem; but he’s also proof that term-limits have negative consequence – for he has been an exceptional Statesman for decades, and we would’ve lost him long ago, if we had term limits.

        So in my opinion in terms of corruption, we are chasing symptoms instead of the root cause, which is helping the electorate identify when a politician is useless. Examples of this: Kentucky for McConnell, California for Feinstein, New York for Schumer, and Maine for Collins.

        Independent of corruption, old age is certainly an issue though. But even from a corruption standpoint, these senile geriatrics know they’re not long for this world and have little stake in the long-term future of the country, or even being worried about being held accountable and spending years in prison. That alone matters.

        • raze2012@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’d personally say the problem isn’t term-limits; it’s the ignorance of the electorate

          I’d say that it’s disenfranchisement and the fact that elections arent mandatory. That makes it more advantageous for the non-working class to spend time at townhalls and at voting booths.

          A man working 2 jobs 12 hours a day to support his family simply isn’t going to have the same kind of presence as a business owner who makes his own hohrs or retirees who no longee work full time. And that applies even to voting. So guess how the voter skews?

          But mandatory voting isn’t even in the conversion right now. Term limits are and has precedent. We gotta try something.

          • lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah I’m amicable to term limits as one method of helping solve this, I just have concerns and will have to do more of a deep dive on the pros and cons. Sadly the issue with so many of these good ideas is that it still puts the cart before the horse. We know what needs to be done, but since the likes of term limits require literal Constitutional Amendments, that requires both widespread public consensus, and an ability to vote together and for legitimate representatives willing to play ball – which, naturally, is the very problem we’re trying to fix in the first place.

            So we have the 3rd and 4th step… But how do we get there from here?

            • raze2012@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              really hard to say. We first need to stop breaking our government and get adults back in the room. Then we need chains of actions that rebuilds trust amongst all of us, or enough of the apathetic to rule out the inevtiable MAGA propoganda. It’s not impossible because term limits are generally a positive topic (very few people like the idea of career politicians to begin with), but still an uphill battle

              Alternatively, we could somehow garner massive support that even Trump can’t ignore. But that’s a harder order than the above.

      • joe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Term limits are a double edged sword. You lose experience when you kick people out just because they have experience, not to mention taking away voter choice.

        It might be better to limit consecutive terms to a low number, based on the length of the term of office. For example, no more than 2 consecutive terms as a US Senator, or something.

        I agree with you that there’s a problem that needs solving.

        • raze2012@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          These ghouls do their dardnest to make sure remove voter choice as is.

          Besides, term limits don’t need to be 8 years. Make it 3-4 terms for Senate and 10 for House. The main idea isn’t a revolving door, but to make sure fossils older than my dead grandpa aren’t still in Congress controlling my (theoretical) kids future.

          • joe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Well, that’s a different take than the one I responded to. You seem focused on age limits, which are not the same as term limits.

            As the other person noted, term limits won’t keep old people from being elected, if they’re old when they’re first elected.

            Not that they both can’t be problems worth addressing, but we should take care to define what it is we’re trying to solve, and solve it as directly as possible.

            • raze2012@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              ahh. I might have mixed up threads.

              Yeah, the age thing doesn’t matter as much. You can technically be 30 and still be seriously hospitalized like this. You can be 80 and genuinely have the best interst for the country. it’s just more likely at 80 that you end up this way, on tubes and bitter at the world. T

              he issues here is that represenatives have no incentive to actually do their job, or at least have minimum accountability from not doing their job as long as they are “the right people”. I beleive other countries have either recall processes for situations like this, or require X days per quarter in session before special elections can be triggered.

              • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                18 hours ago

                We should have multiple forms of accountability. Recalls, age and term limits, a cap on recesses and vacations, backup representatives when people go on vacation, requirements to attend town halls, and so forth.

    • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I disagree with the the former, it’s too easy to exploit, and also people are living with cognisance and clarity and good health for much longer than they used to, with no signs of a stop coming to that trend yet.

      I vehemently agree with the latter though, should be something hard to exploit, cause GOP could use it as a weapon against their enemies

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sorry, can you clarify – disagree with blanket age caps as we already have age mins, or disagree with a cognitive/physical annual assessment as we often as private employees are subject to already?

          • lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Of course; though contextually that could’ve meant the latter paragraph, too. I was slightly thrown off as I don’t know how one would exploit hard age limits, but instead it also seemed exploiting the cognitive assessments would be an easier thing to exploit.

            Either way, something must be done of course. Hopefully consensus continues to rise on this.

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I cant even miss work for 3 days in a row without a doctor note and this pos just doing w/e?