• trebach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sometimes the rich people want them. There’s one Flock camera at the entrance of a nearby rich neighborhood aimed into it to catch cars entering or exiting. All the others in the county are next to county property or along roads with high traffic.

        • tektite@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          My area used to have a Flock camera pointing down a short dead end road. I wondered who lived on that road that it needed its own alpr but then one day the camera was turned to face the arterial.

          Thankfully my city got rid of Flock.

  • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    For us non-Americans, can someone provide some info about that blue blob on the bottom left, where it looks like there’s a camera every 2m?

  • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    And? It’s not just white privilege. There are a lot of more expensive and whiter neighborhoods in Manhattan. It would be more interesting to find out how they managed to keep Flock out so others could emulate it.

  • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Big deal. Cameras along the perimeter can basically log whenever they come and go. The rich and privileged need to know all those other cameras need to go if they really want a modicum of privacy back.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    In their defense, white collar crime - whilst doing the most damage to society - isn’t generally done on the street.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Hard to say what they mean by just “income”. Things like Per Capita Income just divide an area’s total income by its total population, meaning non-working adults, retirees, and kids with zero earnings are factored into the average.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    I checked a few rich areas around me and they’ve got about the same amount. I think for many of them, it’s to protect their riches rather than to preserve their privacy from the government. After all, they own both major parties so what is there to fear?

    Now if only we really were hunting down and executing the rich - bet they’d be more eager to not get tracked. But… I won’t hold out hope.

    • brandon@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      You can definitely live in Manhattan on $140k. You probably have a studio or 1BR apartment.

        • brandon@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Most NYC residents rent, they don’t purchase the homes they live in.

          $1.3M is actually lower than I would have guessed for this neighborhood considering the amount of homes here that are probably worth more than $10M (maybe it’s a median, not a mean?).

          A quick search does show a bunch of listings for studios less than $500K.

          • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            140K is an after-tax income of 100K. If you spend 75% of your after-tax income on housing (which is utterly insane but people do it), that’s $6250 per month, which could support a house price of $800,000 to $900,000. Not a lot for Manhattan.

            You could also pay $6250 a month for rent which is also utterly insane, but would at least get you a somewhat normal apartment with some actual space.