• crazyduck@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    30 minutes ago

    Here they just adjust the definition of “late”. By now iirc a train needs to be more than 7m delayed before it’s considered late in the statistics

  • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 day ago

    but it worked on the spreadsheet where the lack of maintenance in the lines doesn’t cause issues, no personnel is ever sick, and people deboard and board the train in a microsecond

    • manager at DB
  • fdnomad@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    They figured out a loophole to improve the statistics: a train can’t be late if it never arrives.

    • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Check out the french way: trains regularly 5-15 minutes late? Just add 20 minutes to the arrival time.

      It does work through 😁

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        In Wellington, NZ is the busses and trains are often late, but they run every 5-20 mins and they have electronic boards telling you when they are estimated to arrive based on real time tracking, so it’s not a big deal when you can just show up and one won’t be far away.

          • Dave@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            Ah right. Yeah we don’t have a lot those, we have a hub and spoke system of commuter trains, with gaps filled with busses.

            Wellington is services by a couple of weekday trains from neighbouring cities, that are each approx 2 hours away (slow ones, travelling around 150km distance in that time). Of those trains, one only runs once a day and not at all on weekend, and the other is only like 4 a day and 2 on weekends. Intercity rail is not that good here. You can get Wellington<->Auckland (two biggest cities) but it’s priced for tourists not commuters (goes pasts mountains etc). Plus is a whole day’s travel, we don’t have fast trains.

  • Lupus108@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Iirc for the DB a train is considered on time when it’s not later than 7 min on arrival. Which is a joke if you miss your following connection.

      • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        24 hours ago

        they abuse this mechanic to catch up on late trains, by stopping their trains a couple stops before the end stop and turning them around to drive the other direction, now not late anymore.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I have this same argument with my spouse. If fifteen minutes late is “on time”, then change the arrival time and just be on time.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Ah, the Ryanair approach. But unreliable arrival times are annoying for passengers and a drain. Sure, build in a small amount of slack, but a functioning train system should be able to get to 90% punctuality without adding 15 minutes of slack everywhere.

    • mr_might44@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Luckily the next train you have to take is also late, so nothing really changes. A system so broken that it works “perfectly”.

    • FishFace@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Having been on a delayed German train, my connection actually waited so that everyone on my train connecting to it could catch it…

  • FishFace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Cannot confirm from the DB reports which put it at about 90% punctuality overall.

    But this got me to look up the UK statistics - when I was growing up it was always a stereotype that UK trains sucked and German trains were great. Today, the three minute punctuality of UK trains is 85%, and the 15 minute punctuality is 98%. From that we could subtract cancellations, which are at around 3-4%.

    DB breaks it out by regional and long-distance trains though (long-distance is much worse, less than 70% on these reports)

    https://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/statistics/performance/passenger-rail-performance/

    https://zbir.deutschebahn.com/2025/de/konzern-zwischenlagebericht-ungeprueft/qualitaet-und-sicherheit/puenktlichkeit/

    • Sv443@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Their metric for punctuality isn’t realistic. If your train is late by just a couple minutes you could already be missing your connecting trains, or suffer so much stress your day is ruined before it can properly begin.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        A couple of minutes delay almost never causes a missed connection in the UK, because connection times that the route planning service uses are more generous than that. You’d have to be quite unlucky: probably a combination of a connection from one end of the station to another and a mobility issue. Connection times are built around this scenario, but I don’t think they build in slack for it.

        I get travel anxiety but have never had my day “ruined” by a couple of minutes delay. It sounds like you might mean that the metric isn’t useful for the very narrow scenario of someone who will get crippling anxiety from that, which is fair enough, but that doesn’t make it “unrealistic”.

  • rustyfish@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    I am terrorised by the Deutsche Bahn so much, when I first visited GB I thought their rail service is amazing.

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    3rd biggest country by GDP btw. I guess that’ what you get for voting conservatives for 20+ years.

    • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      3rd biggest country by GDP btw

      Thought this was japan but looks like they passed them in 2023. Still miles behind in trains though.

      Could be worse though, California has a similar size economy to both and has been struggling to build a single HSR line for decades.

    • Zwiebel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      20years? Bro it was conservatives since thw founding in '49 with like two or three exceptions

  • someoneelse@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The expected delayed effect of austerity politics that were so successfully exported throughout the European Union with great efficiency and cruelty.

      • atro_city@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        USAians have functioning railways? Before Turamp became president, I wanted to visit and looked up whether there were any trains to the places I wanted to go - it was abysmal. If there was a train, it was once a week or something, slow af and stopped very far from wherever I would’ve wanted to visit.

        Their railway system was a joke back then and probably is even worse by now. Last I read about any improvements to it was some highspeed train planned to be built between San Francisco and Los Angeles (or something) and it being delayed by NIMBYs and unwilling governors paid off by the car lobbies. I fully expect it to be (or have been) cancelled.

  • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Not so long ago I read an article about how Trenitalia is among the best European rail companies in all the metrics, from price-quality to delays (or lack thereof).

    Italians complain about trenitalia as if it were a national sport and they rarely can’t understand that the country has one of the best railway systems of Europe. This kind of news about other European rail companies are always a joy to share with an Italian “tossing down the calendar” (Italian idiom for saying blasphemies) about trenitalia because they simply can’t process it.

    • Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      38 minutes ago

      When I went to Italy I thought I must have some sort of perception bias because the Italian trains seemed so much better than any I got in the UK, so I checked the stats and it turns out they are just better. Though going through Milan I did see 2 departures that were delayed by 5 and 17 hours, and I don’t know if that’s better or worse than the cancellations.