I’m glad it’s highlighted on Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown in particular, because that was the first game I’d bought from Ubisoft in years, and the extra launcher deterred me from considering buying any of their other games for a long while still. EA still has launchers on older games like It Takes Two and A Way Out and Dragon Age II and Inquisition that create obstacles for LInux compatibility and offline play, but newer titles like Split Fiction and The Veilguard no longer have the extra launcher problem. It’s good to see Ubisoft following this trend, and hopefully they can stop standing in the way of their own success.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      There was also a time when you also didn’t need Steam. You would buy a game, install it, and play it without having to connect to the internet at all. Growing up, a lot of friends had gaming PCs in their bedrooms with no internet connection at all.

      And if you did do stuff online, it was secondary and the publisher didn’t want a cut. StarCraft actually let you play online without owning the game - it specifically included an installer (The Spawn) that was for installing the multiplayer for free on friends’ systems. You only needed the disc to play singleplayer.

    • InGodWeThrust@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      That’s why I buy from Gog. No need to deal with launchers, always online requirements or any other bs

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I still don’t understand the point of making every game have a shitty launcher. I mean, I can understand MMO’s for updating the actual game and shit, but why the fuck do single player games have them?

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Because then they can advertise their other games to you along with other things, at least going by the blizzard/Activision launcher.

        Can also do environment checks or setup and some troubleshooting/debug/repair from them.

  • TeaAndHotDogs@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Ditching the launcher is great, but I’m guessing they will still require you to create a Ubisoft account and link it in so you can hop over to their store when it “improves”. Better, but a day late and a dollar short

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Fully agree. I think that Steam should make it a platform requirement that external launchers cannot be used on the platform.

      It makes zero sense for me to hit play just to have a third party launcher open, and I have to hit play in that third party launcher as well. and I have to hit play in that third party launcher as well. At that point, I’m better off just buying it through the third party launcher.

      The whole third-party launcher update process is also obnoxious… Every gatcha game does it. what’s the point of using steam at that point

      • Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        1 day ago

        At that point, I’m better off just buying it through the third party launcher.

        Which is exactly why companies like Ubisoft are so dead set on forcing 3rd party launchers down everybody’s throats. They want to drag you out of the Steam ecosystem so they can pocket a bigger piece of the pie and infect your computer with god knows what.

        • Pika@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, which is why I think it doesn’t make sense that Steam allows it in the first place. Like, it’s actively letting a direct competitor use your platform. You get none of the benefits and all of the upkeep.

          • BigPotato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 hours ago

            They get a 30% cut of every sale and also get to say “we’re not a monopoly.” In the business world, that’s a win win.

            • Pika@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              I kinda get that for premium games but, huge offenders of this are free to play gatcha style games. Which all transactions are off platform via their own launcher system. I don’t think steam gets a cut on those. The monopoly thing has a lot of merit though, they have been super concerned about that ruling the last few years.

      • marighost@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        Especially now, where “TV PCs” are a thing (Steam Machine et al.) It’s annoying as FUCK to launch a fresh game on my Deck connected to my TV, only to have to get up 3 minutes later to fiddle with the shitass launcher.

  • BladeFederation@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I might actually buy some Ubisoft games again, pirating is 1000x better for their shit. Some stuff is literally unplayable the way they want you to do it, like Far Cry 3.

    • Artwork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      119
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s sorrowful to know you, or that “pirates”/people like you have guts to admit your sorrow on public.
      Piracy is never ever good unless for history/archiving, and still is questionable.

      You? You are a simple infant robber, a spoiled child, who stole money, or just did not pay people for their life work. A work on ineffably magnificent art…

      • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Nobody who actually made the game is gonna see a dime of the money from your sale. Hell, they’re getting laid off whether the game succeeds or not. Why the fuck do I give the slightest shit about contributing to some Ubisoft exec’s yacht?

        • Artwork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          36
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          These are not your words. You should quote references properly.


          Update [2026-09-11_13-32-00+0]

          The OP chose to not refer to the known author of the words. So, I’ll do.

          So, from our point of view, what we saw more and more is that Piracy was a result of bad service on the part of game companies.

          ~ Gabe Newell Source: https://youtu.be/EQweFurRz4g?t=40

          Meanwhile, indeed, this Community, apparently, has so many hateful people… You do you, people. It’s your life of hatred you create.

          • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            Pass. You’re either a troll or very naive, either way I don’t respect your take.

            Edit: turns out I can edit comments too. Apparently saying I don’t respect the take makes me “hateful”. You do you.

              • funksoulkitchen@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 hours ago

                It’s sorrowful how you “pirates” admit that your sorrow over feeling sorrowful.

                It’s pretty cheap to buy Gabe quotes on steam instead of being sorry how sorrowful your sorrow makes you sorry. It’s like $0.99 during the steam sale. Do you know how much it costs to fuel up a super yacht?

      • Pyr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The artist still got paid for their work. They don’t get a bonus if more copies are sold. The only one not getting money is Ubisoft corporate executives and shareholders.

        • Katana314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I find he’s dramatizing the dichotomy, but I always found this arranged argument lacking.

          Imagine you have a budding farmhand, a hard-working local, in mind when you go to the local farmers’ market to “support local farms”. But that’s wrong, isn’t it? Because the farm owner pays that hand a static salary. Their exact success or revenue off one extra bag of apples isn’t going into that hand’s pocket.

          But it’s also related; that farmhand has better job stability, more chance of a bonus, less pressure to advertise well, if the farm is making a comfortable salary.

          Now, the one part I’ll admit is this logic doesn’t work as well in corporate atmospheres; where CEOs fire as many people as possible, reward no one for good performance, and would rather fudge numbers than sell a good product.

          But I’d also wager a lot of commenters shortcutting their logic to “company bad, pirate games” aren’t always taking a critical investigative eye to how companies treat their people. After all, “I get free game” is a strong motivator to believe a certain way.

          • Pyr@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            The videogame industry specifically is a bit unique I think I’m that most of the time the majority of the artists just get laid off after a large project gets released so there really isn’t any job stability, chance of bonuses, loyalty, etc.

            I would never pirate an Indy game but Ubisoft, EA, rockstar, fuck em.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Now, the one part I’ll admit is this logic doesn’t work as well in corporate atmospheres; where CEOs fire as many people as possible, reward no one for good performance, and would rather fudge numbers than sell a good product.

            So you agree with the person you’re replying to, and the two paragraphs before this one are irrelevant to what’s being talked about?

            • Katana314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Are you prepared to assert and prove that every single company over a certain revenue is exactly the same?

              I’ve come into conversations with preconceived “large company slop” feelings towards a large brand, only for a person there to remark “My brother works for that company. He says they get great benefits, and are generally treated very well.”

              Sometimes the bullshit is only on the consumer side, in which case it only makes sense to avoid them because you’re getting a bad product. If you insist the product is bad, and that you’re stealing the bad product that you somehow want, in order to support the mistreated employees, who are actually being treated okay, then maybe it turns out there’s not much logic behind the protest action of pirating?

              I’ve seen pirates use the same generic excuse for midsize indie publishers that have no such reason to be hated - so it’s disappointing to see people don’t actually think those things through.

              • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Are you prepared to assert and prove that every single company over a certain revenue is exactly the same?

                So in this conversation about a specific company, and how this specific company behaves, and someone commenting on pirating from this specific company, why am I being expected to extend that to every compy?

      • musubibreakfast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I’m so tired of your shit Mr Guillemot. There’s no need for you to come in here and talk down to us. You’re the CEO of Ubisoft, you can literally do anything you want. Go fly a kite, go hug your family, go do something that brings you joy and please leave us poors alone.

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I also ignored Ubisoft games. Not all games they publish had all this crap BTW, but you could count the interesting ones on one hand.

  • otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hoping to see this update come to Watch Dogs and Assassin’s Creed. Currently can’t get it to work in Linux and can’t be bothered to troubleshoot when I have other games to play.

    • yukichigai@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Doesn’t sound like they’re going to backport this unfortunately. Damn shame: I absolutely love The Division but having it on Steam means I have to run two launchers to play it. It usually works… usually.

  • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I wouldn’t mind additional launchers and accounts, if it was optional without hiding core game elements behind it. A game must launch and the base game be playable on Steam without additional online DRM, software launchers and account requirement. For single player games that are fine to play offline.

  • mohab@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m glad it’s highlighted on Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown in particular, because that was the first game I’d bought from Ubisoft in years, and the extra launcher deterred me from considering buying any of their other games for a long while still.

    This is like the only good game they put out in forever. Great combat, I had fun coming up with combos in it, but I dropped it eventually because it dragged on for too long, and the further I progressed, the fewer enemies I could juggle, so I was having less and less fun.

    That clone fight was peak though. Reminded me of an almost identical fight in F.I.S.T: Forged in Shadow Torch—yet another metroidvania with awesome combat and combo system.

  • Artwork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    With all of licenses acquired at Steam, for more than 10 years, I had never had a single issue with Ubisoft Launcher in all of adventured ineffably magnificent Miracles… of artists, developers, managers, people… at Ubisoft I heartfelt… soulful appreciate…