• lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I can’t believe it. I honestly believe that the SC is fully corrupt and morally compromised. What is their angle?

    • Jay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      92
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Maybe it’s just my distrust of the whole thing, but I wouldn’t put it past them to do this just for plausible deniability, while the post office still rejects everything they can in accordance to trump’s wishes… That way people will trust mail in voting, and end up with their votes rejected anyway. They get exactly what they want while still giving some illusion of fairness.

      Then, after the elections they’ll just say whoops! USPS shouldn’t have done that, and nothing will happen.

      Edit: on another article about this…

      Alito wrote in his dissent that the Postal Service “has broad authority to regulate the mail” and likely does have the power to enforce Trump’s restrictions.

      So ya. It’s a trap.

    • bthest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      They want to give us the impression of a “big victory” so that we’ll forget about the Voting Rights Act overturning and all the last minute redistricting that is still in play.

      i.e. they want this to be last big election ruling we remember so that we’ll all look back and say “wuh wuh I guess they won fair and square because we won that case so muh muh”

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Roberts, Barrett, and Gorsuch appear to actually stand up for federalism. They might actually think the postal rule is illegal because it usurps power reserved to the states.

      Kavanaugh thinks the rule is probably legal, but it’s too close to the election to implement.

      Alito and Thomas dissented. They think the rule should go into effect now.

        • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          Alito flew this flag at his vacation home

          The Appeal to Heaven Flag has been used by Christian nationalists in the United States since 2013. The origins of the Appeal to Heaven flag as an emblem of the Christian nationalist movement in the United States trace to 2013, when Pentecostal cleric Dutch Sheets received the flag as a gift and prophesied that it would be the “symbol of a campaign to restore America to the Christian nation God intended.” The flag was given to governor of Alaska Sarah Palin, who advocated for the Appeal to Heaven Flag to be flown “over courthouses and statehouses.” In the 2020s, the flag was flown at events attended by various Christian right and far-right groups including a Christian nationalist strand of Donald Trump’s “Stop the Steal” movement. In particular, the flag was carried by several of the US Capitol rioters on January 6, 2021.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pine_Tree_Flag

          https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/31/us/appeal-to-heaven-flag-meaning-cec

        • mkwt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          Are you aware that the Alito and Thomas dissent is full of false claims about the yuge amount of election fraud in the country?

          On this case they’re voting with the president against our democracy.

          • TheMadCodger@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yeah, I’m just making a round about way of saying I’m not surprised; they dissent on everything that should be a no brainier

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        i think thats the only reason, too close to election. it will hurt Maga counties as much as dem ones if they allowed it now.

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Plausible deniability.

      Remember, trump only knows a ridiculous bully bulldozer negotiation style - “I’m suing you for 11 trillion dollars!!!”

      That’s ridiculous, so it all goes on circular fighting for months/years, eventually they settle for $17 million in a “big loss” for trump when he shouldn’t have even had a penny in the first place.

      In this case, the damage is already done at USPS and beyond.

      • The predominate ballot machine company was just recently purchased by trump loyalists
      • Biden was blocked on procedure but didn’t take extreme measures to remove dejoy from USPS or to halt or reverse the damage he did.
      • Musk manipulated votes in multiple ways, he now has more money and more criminal liability this time around… So he’ll probably just sit this one out?
      • flock cameras are watching you vote this time, scanning your face/plates, linked to a profile with your “estimated threat level” and deploying the limited number of brown shirts they have to most “efficient” areas where “they” are gathering based on flock cross referenced with exit polls and historical turnout for registered voters at a given polling place.
      • ice agents may or may not disrupt polls directly, though the threat alone will keep many voters away. Though they may avoid direct voter intimidation beyond a couple early performative shows, they may just cause strategic disruptions NEAR real time targeted key polling places (see above point) and disrupt common car/bus travel routes
      • all the above in coordination with news/media and social media companies owned and run by complicit oligarchs with incentive to tell the story the other fascists need told.
      • and a now mature cult, pardoned from consequences of a prior failed coup, likely impatiently waiting for another story of national violence to help them unite as perceived victims or bask in the glow of a “victorious” violent act for “their team”.

      So scotus does this with nothing to lose. Grandmas in Ohio then trust and defend the validity of voting and believe that checks and balances still in place to supervise an “overzealous” trump. They then refer back to this after the manipulated election to come - “Look! These liberals are never happy? The supreme court denied changes that we still should have had but didn’t need, and they still lost, while cheating, and they can’t accept it” and then broken scotus says your right actually and they rule the other way leading up to '28.

      If we are still a country then.

      • lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The state of US democracy is dire.

        Don’t despair yet, though. Orban was just as criminal as Trump and he was still voted out. People opposed showed up in such numbers that even his cheating couldn’t overcome the will of the voters.

        Americans just need to understand the stakes (as you clearly do). Losing your job because you skipped work to vote is terrible, but still better than a liferime under Trump and his ilk.

    • wjrii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      They save him from the most blatantly, stupidly obvious unconstitutional things he tries to do so there’s a faint gossamer of legitimacy left on the 90% of his bullshit that they find some weak-ass excuse to let through. This makes it more likely that they can lock in and perpetuate the more systemic aspects of his grasping for power.

    • aramis87@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Cynically? After the elections are held, Trump and the Republicans are going to challenge every single Democrat headed for office, and SCROTUS will uphold enough of those challenges for the Republicans to keep control (like they did in Bush v Gore). They’ll point back to these rulings as evidence of their impartiality.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      Ehhh they’re only 90% corrupt. On most issues it’s hard to tell because the line is so far from normal liberal politics but it is there. They want the right-wing oligarchy but not a full on dictatorship. They have been pretty consistent and not letting him go full Mussolini even though they’ll allow most kinds of fuckery.

      Except Thomas and Alito. Those two are full on fascists.

    • CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Did you want them to support disallowimg mail in ballots? I see this as a good ruling for democracy.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 days ago

        At this point, considering what they’ve enabled, my reaction is “there must be a gotcha in there somewhere”. That, or it’s as simple as them realizing they were moving the needle too far and too fast, and are pumping the brakes a bit, if only for appearances.

        I’m kind of irretrievably jaded on the integrity of pretty much any branch of our government at this point.

          • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’m honestly unsure if there will even be elections in 2028. And even if there is, we all fucking saw what they tried to do on J6, and I clock it at a roughly 100% chance they’ll try the same shit again.

            At any rate, the manner in which the midterms pan out (and I mean “whether the fascists find some idiotic legal fig leaf to use as a basis for excluding anyone but their own party from the national legislature” and “whether the electoral numbers going to be systematically fucked with”, in addition to “what the voting outcome is”) is going to be extremely telling.

      • Jay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        The problem is the USPS “will not deliver ballots for states if there are any discrepancies between the voter information in the USPS system and what’s picked up by agency scanners on the envelopes of the ballots.”

        So the USPS, run by a trump appointee, gets to screen your ballot according to the info the trump admin gives them. That does not sound good at all imo. https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/01/politics/usps-whistleblower-mail-ballot-rules-trump

        • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          They make good rulings all the time. It’s just usually when doing the right thing also happens to align with the court’s own interests. I can count on John Roberts to support his own interests, if nothing else. And it is not in the best interest of SCOTUS judges for the presidency to become a full dictatorship. If that happens, they lose all their power as well. They support a powerful presidency because a powerful presidency is the only way to push through unpopular social conservative policies. But they don’t want a full dictatorship either.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Why would someone saying they can’t believe it make you ask if they think it’s a bad decision?

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        its the classict tactic of the gop, have enough of the support(of your parties goals) so you can pretend to vote the opposite. except this is slightly reversed, they can feign they were fighting “fraud”

    • Zephorah@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Their whole thing does have the common theme of decentralizing and throwing as much as possible back to the states. Which includes funding.

      Long game it does set it up for oligarchs (even more so) while projecting an impression of leaving the republic or whatever intact.

      In addition to what you all are saying about not being so blatant about creating your own voter fraud.

      That said, I can’t imagine there not being individual bad players peppered throughout the postal service. Use your drop boxes and not the mail box for returns.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      They can get their powers removed if they sway the voting population too far against them.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        probably would hurt maga areas too? unless they plan on preferentially ignoring “discripencies, in red counties” then it would just cause another mess.