cm0002@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 3 months agoSeems like the most reasonable explanationimagemessage-square77linkfedilinkarrow-up11.49Karrow-down13cross-posted to: funny@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.48Karrow-down1imageSeems like the most reasonable explanationcm0002@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 3 months agomessage-square77linkfedilinkcross-posted to: funny@lemmy.ml
minus-squareMicrow@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down53·3 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squarearrow74@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up39·3 months ago They were insinuating something false That’s the premise for a lot of comedy
minus-squareRizzRustbolt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down9·3 months agoTell that to Hisan Minhaj.
minus-squareNotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 months agoYou’re having a bad day, huh? That sucks.
minus-squareOhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·3 months agoYou have a hard time spotting sarcasm, don’t you?
minus-squareSLVRDRGN@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·3 months agoYeah but it very clearly is a joke - and one meant to point out how absurd it is to say that no abuse happened at all. No?
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoMaybe conspiracy theorists need more bait
deleted by creator
That’s the premise for a lot of comedy
Tell that to Hisan Minhaj.
You’re having a bad day, huh? That sucks.
You have a hard time spotting sarcasm, don’t you?
What is false?
deleted by creator
Yeah but it very clearly is a joke - and one meant to point out how absurd it is to say that no abuse happened at all. No?
Maybe conspiracy theorists need more bait