LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 6 days agoI dunnoimagemessage-square335linkfedilinkarrow-up1796arrow-down178
arrow-up1718arrow-down1imageI dunnoLadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square335linkfedilink
minus-squareTheRedSpade@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·6 days agoHow can you be sure it’s not defined when we only see one line?
minus-squareVoroxpete@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·edit-25 days agoThey didn’t say it’s not defined, they said it’s not a valid name. Most languages don’t allow function names to start with a number, so 5 literally cannot be a function if that’s the case. But that’s assuming this isn’t some really obscure language.
How can you be sure it’s not defined when we only see one line?
They didn’t say it’s not defined, they said it’s not a valid name. Most languages don’t allow function names to start with a number, so 5 literally cannot be a function if that’s the case.
But that’s assuming this isn’t some really obscure language.