The European Central Bank (ECB) has unveiled proposed motifs for the next generation of Euro banknotes, centered on European nature and culture — including rivers, birds, and abstract landscapes — replacing the current architectural themes.

Public submissions during the consultation phase have included proposals such as Miguel de Cervantes, Marie Curie, and Leonardo da Vinci, reflecting citizen interest in honoring cultural icons. The ECB has not endorsed any individual portraits, emphasizing pan-European symbolism and inclusivity.

  • Humanius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    4 个月前

    I’m not sure if I like the idea of putting the faces of specific people on the banknotes. Wasn’t the whole reason of the fake architectural styles and bridges on the notes, to not give preferential treatment to any one country?

    Now they are proposing specific people from specific countries:

    • €5: Greek opera singer Maria Callas
    • €10: German composer Ludwig van Beethoven
    • €20: Polish-French scientist Marie Curie
    • €50: Spanish author Miguel de Cervantes
    • €100: Italian polymath Leonardo da Vinci
    • €200: Austrian peace activist Bertha von Suttner

    So what about representation for the other countries?

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 个月前

      As a dual Polish-Spanish citizen I’m getting double representation: Cervantes and Maria Skłodowska-Curie. All I can say to all the French, Dutch, Czech and other nationals without any representation is: you should have produced more culturally significant people :P

      • Humanius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        4 个月前

        With 27 member states and only 6 bank notes, you cannot represent every country no matter how many culturally significant people each country has. It forces you to pick at most six, and the rest is simply not represented. That is why the original notes represented the general idea of architectural styles and not specific real-world examples of those architectural styles.

        The proposal for landscapes, rivers and birds seems like a much better one, in my opinion.

          • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 个月前

            Exactly. Why can’t we have this? It would be so much fun to have different country bills.

            • HM King Charles III DG FD@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 个月前

              The UK actually does this- Northern Ireland and Scotland have their own banknotes. (Some Northern Ireland ones are even vertical!) and you can maybe count the Isle of Man, Jersey, and Guernsey, however they do officially use a different currency although it’s still a “pound” and pegged to British pounds.

        • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 个月前

          To be fair, I think rivers and landscapes are equally flawed. Rivers are an extremely boring topic and landscapes tend to be inside a single country.

          Birds are the best in my opinion.

        • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 个月前

          I’m just joshing. Of course it’s a stupid idea. They should use neutral images or let each country design their own version of the bill.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 个月前

        As a dual Polish-Spanish citizen

        That’s a peculiar combination. There’s dozens of us!

    • Microw@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 个月前

      It has been 25 years, countries are much more integrated now than they were back then when the first notes were designed. So it should not be as problematic as it would have been back then. Plus the coins continue to have the national symbols.

      But yes, it still is controversial nonetheless.

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 个月前

        With the extreme right on the rise, I think the timing isn’t ideal to feed into nationalist pride.