• leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    1 day ago

    Journalists need to bring back the good old art of monstering.

    Do you have bite scars on your penis, Mr. President!?

    Show us your penis, Mr. President!

    • azuth@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      He would probably whip it out,hi very beautiful penis, most beautiful penis in the world you know, never been scarred, beautiful, everybody asks to see it.

    • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      The only time someone asks to see his penis is for court proceedings.

      Times certainly have changed, he used to get asked to see his penis after promising to pay someone but now they all know you need to get the cash from him first.

  • captcha_incorrect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    Page 10: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 12/EFTA02858481.pdf

    EPSTEIN talked about blackmailing people in front of [redacted]. [redacted] was confident TRUMP knew EPSTEIN blackmailed people because she heard EPSTEIN and TRUMP talking about it. [redacted] stated she knew TRUMP had illegal building permits. She heard him (TRUMP) talking about washing money through casinos.

    I wonder if this is true, about Trump washing money.

    • Etterra@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Some time after the Orange Jackass is in the ground because nobody in power has the fucking balls to so much as slow him down.

  • D_C@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 day ago

    Question:
    How can a person who has these type of documents and accusations about them ever be allowed to run for any type of political position? Let alone become the president of a country (twice)?

    • nao@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Wasn’t it something like:

      • 1/3 voted in favor of him
      • 1/3 voted against him
      • 1/3 couldn’t be bothered
      • D_C@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I prefer a third voted against. A third voted for. And a third enabled it to happen, either by protest or ignorance.

        • Heikki2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          My FIL is a Die Hard Conservative. He refused to vote for Trump… and Harris. He didn’t vote for either to “send” a message. I told him a bigger message would be to vote Democratic but he “could not” bc they are forcing kids to be transgender. I told him to prove that and he could not but he saw it on Faux New or News Min and it had to be true.

          I asked him if he knew Faux News was settled on a 750 million dollar defamation case for the lies spread about Dominion voting sustems. He did not and said the 2020 election was a fraud… you can’t get through to these people

    • Vespair@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Because he told the worst people in the country that he would hurt the people they don’t like.

      Honestly that’s it, that the whole thing. There’s nothing deeper than that.

      Trump told racists, bigots, evil people that he was going to hurt their enemies, so they voted for him.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      But you don’t understand, the only other choice we had was a lady

            • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              19 hours ago

              She never gave birth how could she know what its like to be a mother and love children? Vote for the rapist male.

              • Aeao@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 hours ago

                Exactly if you’re ever voting and on won hand yoy have let’s say a know rapist felon who wants word war 3 and simps yo anyone who hand him something shiny like some sort of braindamaged crow… and the other hand you have a women. Yuk, gross, they have more bodily fluids than I do and I flat out don’t trust it.

                Who knows what a woman would do with power!

      • MJKee9@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Come on. That lady didn’t believe exactly everything I believed. How could I vote for someone who is not only a female, but someone who didn’t believe exactly what I believed!?!?

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          24 hours ago

          She supported everything you support, especially genocide. Which is why you’re belittling anyone who had a problem with genocide like this.

          • MJKee9@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            18 hours ago

            I will belittle anyone that put Donald Trump in office. And if you didn’t vote for Kamala Harris, you helped put Donald Trump in office. I and a lot of people on this platform knew exactly what we were in for with Donald Trump 2.0. But millions of people let perfect be the enemy of the good.

            It’s a choice of survival. I’m never going to say the DNC is perfect. Frankly, I think the DNC is worse than the RNC. I’m a Bernie bro from 2016. But when you see a fuckin train coming down the tracks, step off the rails.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              17 hours ago

              But millions of people let perfect be the enemy of the good.

              Genocide. Is. NOT. The. Good.

              No matter how much you love it.

    • Xatolos@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s because legally, having a criminal record doesn’t disqualify you from running. There isnt anything preventing this. Most likely its to help prevent a minor mishap from long ago condemning your future abilities (otherwise, you’d have all sorts of small charges against every politician to destroy their career. It would make the worst blackmail material).

      Now, morally why did enough people vote for him anyway is a whole different issue that I don’t have an answer for.

      • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s also so that someone can’t weaponize law enforcement on their political opponents. So let’s say you’re president. You come after me on a bogus charge. I’ve now got a record. I can no longer run against you.

        Morally, I agree entirely.

        • Hathaway@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Crazy to me, that, this is all true, I can become the president, can’t vote for it. Assuming it’s a felony.

          Edit: I have educated myself, and this is not the case. I am not a felon, do not have any experience lol I’ve just, incorrectly, heard, that you can’t vote if you’re a felon.

          • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah, felonies are more complicated and on a per state basis. A lot of media has flattened it into this binary thing.

      • Stormy@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        I know loads of adults with no “minor mishaps.” It’s not just normal to have a criminal record, they had no reason to do that. They just assumed no one was dumb enough to vote for criminals

        • SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          I know plenty of people with records. Few of them are white. Fewer still are white, cis, straight, and ablebodied.

          If you look a certain way or dress a certain way, law enforcement tends to look for opportunities to harass or arrest you. So no, I don’t think it should be illegal to hold office as a felon. (I’m also against felons having their voting rights taken from them.)

      • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sure but that is easily fixed by making certain crimes bar you from running for example, being a pedo

    • Reygle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      A considerable amount of the American general public is criminally ignorant, willfully terrible, or both.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Good portion of people don’t give a shit.

      I’ve spend the past three years trying to get people to investigate the sexual and physical abuse of children in Oklahoma, including some child trafficking. No one cares or wants to do anything about it. More people than we want to admit are okay with children being raped and abused as long as they are a certain type of child (foster kids usually.)

      • zip@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        You’re absolutely correct. From one of the kids in Oklahoma who you were talking about, who was failed hardcore by law enforcement, the courts, the Church, supposed family, fuckin’ everyone… Thank you for recognizing it, believing it, and trying to get shit done about it. I genuinely mean it with all my heart. I’m sending a big internet hug your way. <3

    • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Look… it’s a ballroom. It’s definitely not a burial site for documents used to mix the concrete.

      • Thorry@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It’s a very transparent corruption tool. When Trump was elected, he and his ghouls went around with the hat to get “donations” from all of the large companies. Especially the ones in big tech donated huge amounts for what turned out to be a very sad inauguration ceremony. After Trump gifted all of them huge tax benefits and removing restrictions and regulations, the time had come for the hat to go around again. But you can’t just donate directly to the president, then even the dumbest of the dumb would cry foul. So like the shitty landlord Trump has always been he destroyed part of the White House and announced plans for a huge new construction project. This allowed all of the assholes to once again “donate” to this project. A project that has caused a lot of damage to a monument in order to “own the libs” and has raked in millions in donations, but has done little else. All of this money is being pocketed by Trump and his goons.

        As with many terrible things, it’s all out in the open and yet America does nothing. Checks and balances indeed.

        • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s called “Money Laundering” and the Real Estate Developer version of it is one of the few things that Trump is actually an expert at. Because at his core, he’s a criminal.

          • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            And what’s crazy is that he has crypto schemes that are even easier to use, but his Alzheimer’s addled brain can’t remember a time when he wasn’t swindling with real estate. So that’s what he’s fixating on.

  • brownsugga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    what about him watching as the newborn child of a 13 year old r*** victim was thrown into the water from a boat

    • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      AFAIK that’s an unsubstantiated claim by one person unrelated to the victim or anyone, and it doesn’t make sense logistically. You’re not going to let a 12-13 year old walk around pregnant for 9 months just so you can throw their child in a lake. You just have it aborted.

      The child rapes and abuses he is confirmed to have done are bad enough. No point in muddying the waters by instead focusing on more spectacular unsubstantiated claims. Unless you care more about spectacle than bringing child rapists to justice.

  • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    2 days ago

    Literal victims being victimized doing more to punish Epstein associates than the US Govt.

    I was relieved to see she was interviewed as an adult in 2019. Brave as a girl, brave as a woman.