• catalyst@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Big aeropress, glass aeropress, now metal aeropress! What’s next? Gotta diversify that product line for maximum profits!

    (Disclaimer: long time plastic aeropress user here. 😊)

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    As much as I would like to set it on the floor and step on it for “ghettospresso,” that price is ridiculous.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Aeropress was never anything like expresso. it just makes a fast cup easily, and the best part is the way the puck pops out into the trash and there is minimal clean up and no pod waste.

  • UnPassive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Where’s my V60 gang? We take the aeropress camping, but I like the simplicity of the V60 at home

    • jabberwock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I’ve been thinking of switching from my usual French press method to a V60, seems simpler for one cup.

      Have you looked into reusable filters at all or do you use the good ole paper cone?

  • gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I exclusively use the plastic aeropress (3 years or so) and although upgrading to something stainless seems like a nice upgrade I’d want to revisit best brewing methods and make that decision again before spending $150+. I don’t drink coffee every week let alone every month, typically doing week long streaks before taking a break, so this is cool to see but nothing that makes me rush out and upgrade.

    There seems to be some haters in the comments for the aeropress, I guess I’d like to know better alternatives for quickly brewing black coffee for one person.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I guess I’d like to know better alternatives for quickly brewing black coffee for one person.

      Pour over a paper filter. Cheap and fast.

    • HereIAm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      French press? Or a freestanding thingy that you put a coffee filter in with a cup underneath for a one cup drip coffee.

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I have had an original aeropress for over a decade, and I love it. The fact it’s plastic is my only complaint. I would sooner switch to French press or a pour-over cone than spend $150. Not a chance.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Oh, everyone is now scared of micro plastics that have been around for 70 years and no lab has yet to find a mechanism for toxicity. Meanwhile, we have been implanting plastic prosthetics, shunts, pacers, etc. for 70 years and there were no issues.

      Americans love to be scared. BPA doesn’t give you tits either.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          but there have been eye-opening studies if you have been paying attention.

          You picked the wrong guy for this. Junk science in a second rate journal is not eye opening. Correlation is not causation.

          "Compared to adjacent non-cancerous tissues, tumor tissues exhibited a greater variety and distribution of microplastics. "

          Because cancerous tissue does not have the intact structure of normal tissues. They see all kinds of stuff in tumors that the lymphatic system clears out of healthy tissues. That paper does not show HOW plastic polymers could cause tumors, because no one can show this in 50 years of research.

          Again, we have been implanting plastic stents and meshes and prosthetics for 60+ years. The experiment has been done.

          Since this thread is looking for something to be afraid of, look at coffee brewing with and without paper filtration. Filtered brews yield caffeine and compounds healthy for liver functions. Unfiltered coffees contain diterpenes, cafestol and kahweol, which signficantly raise total and LDL cholesterol, which is bad. Actual science, not media driven hype fear.

    • vext01@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Did someone test the aeropress and find lots of microplastics?

      A few people mentioned it here.

      If its a concern, aren’t (e.g.) tupperware and coffee flasks too?

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Did someone test the aeropress and find lots of microplastics?

        of course not. People read it on Reddit.

      • snoons@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Yes, all plastic food service items are of concern.

        *Though the studies on harder plastics have been focused on plasticizers leeching into the food or liquid.

  • fritobugger2017@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    20 hours ago

    This makes so much more sense than that ridiculous glass version.

    I’m guessing that Aeropress has lost a ton of market share to the Oxo Rapid Brewer (which appears to be superior to the Aeropress in everyway). Aeropress is now scrambling with any and all ideas to try to recall market share.

    • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The aeropress never made coffee well because it used pressure. It excelled at being a faster cafetière/french press with a paper filter and easier clean up. Outside of large metal lever brewers steams they only way to get pressure that will impact a brew significantly. The oxo rapid brew is more mechanically complex, harder to clean and can only brew a limited set of ways the aeropress can. I don’t think it will out compete the aeropress.

  • snoons@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Maybe I could just find two bits of steel pipe and weld some bits on it. 🤔

  • zabadoh@ani.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    “Pre-order ships in May”

    An eye watering $169, but hey it’s finally here.

    Slightly cheaper than the $199 stupidly breakable glass Premium.

    Slightly larger 12oz capacity vs 10oz Aeropress original, but smaller than the 20oz XL

    • vext01@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thats silly money.

      The charm of the AP is that it’s cheap and you can just lob it in your camping bag.

      • zabadoh@ani.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Speaking of packing for camping, the website doesn’t say how much this new stainless steel version weighs, although I can’t imagine it’s too much heavier than the original plastic.

        • Etnaphele@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          I think it will be substantially heavier!

          No thermal insulation also a big minus in my eyes. Missed the vacuum insulation part…

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            They need to vacuum insulate because heat conductive metal would be a stupid choice of material, as opposed to glass or plastic.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The whole 👉 was a cheap easy coffee maker.

      They are cashing in on the microplastics fad. Simps are so easy to sell to.

    • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve never used one, is the breakable nature of the glass version a result of heat cycles or just because it’ll crack if you knock it by accident?

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        it’s breakable compared to the $20 plastic original, which is basically nuke proof.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 hours ago

          But it somehow makes microplastics no one can see but everyone believes in. Christianity is envious of microplastics.

            • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              what the fuck? the original aeropress is famously not BPA-free.

              oh right the other junk science scare from the early 2000s, based on ONE mouse study where they injected insane amounts of BPA in muscle tissue, then follow ups with more junk science.

              Let’s learn something today: Bisphenol A was actually created by a german pharmacuetical lab trying to make a synthetic hormone. In 1891, and it was revisited many times until the 1930s and considered a failure. It never showed estrogenic properties. Eventually, it ended up as an additive to plastics. The amount shown to be estrogenic in a mouse muscle, after injection, would be impossible for a human to consume in 10 lifetimes. This plagues most of the estrogenic research published.

              But selling fear sells media. So no, BPA will not give you tits.

              Now Aeropresses contain “microplastics”, despite no evidence they actually do.

              Another example of people believing bad science was the banning of DDT. One ecologists faked data about bird populations and linked it the use of DDT, so everyone banned it. Millions died of malaria as a result.

      • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Just the glass

        When I was more likely to have hangovers, my French presses had the habit of choosing that time to leap off the counter and shatter. The plastic Aeropress could survive a drop in just about any kitchen scenario and well beyond.

      • zabadoh@ani.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        One of the big selling features of the original AP was its portability, i.e. you could throw it in your luggage, and durability.

        The glass Premium cancelled those features and was panned for it.

        I can imagine people using the inversion method, which would put the glass part teetering on top while full of hot water while brewing. That would easily tip over, shatter, and cause unhappy customers.

        • Etnaphele@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          The inverted method is a bad idea with any version of the AP, the risk of shattering the fancy glass one could be a good deterrent to stop doing it ;D

    • vext01@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      They address this in the FAQ:

      The number markings are a recognizable part of the AeroPress design and, by including them on Steel, we’re protecting our trademark. To help with fill guidance, the inside of the chamber includes a laser-etched mark at the 5 level that can be seen from above.

      “Protecting trademark”

    • zabadoh@ani.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I don’t use the numbers at all. I do inverted, and pull the plunger until it’s barely in the cylinder, and fill it from there.

      That makes just enough coffee for a standard 10oz mug.

    • zabadoh@ani.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I was thinking about that too, but I have a stainless steel vacuum insulated french press, and I never preheat it.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          No. That doesn’t change the fact that the metal has a higher specific heat capacity than plastic. The vacuum only makes it so that, once it’s hot, it stays hot longer. That’s not really useful here as it shouldn’t be staying in the aeropress for that long, where it matters. It may actually make it worse, because you’ll need thicker walls, and two of them, increasing the mass that you have to heat.

          However, I think the “perfect” heat to brew with is slightly below boiling, so if you just use boiling water then the heat loss is probably fine. Still though, you’re paying a premium for what is functionally a downgrade.

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            you’re paying a premium for what is functionally a downgrade.

            This is business. Cash in on simps who believe in myths.

        • zabadoh@ani.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          The APSS says it’s vacuum insulated too, but we’ll have to see how well it works.

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            it has to be, otherwise the metal will cool the water down and coffee will taste like shit.

            You guys still using water to make coffee? Water can drown at high amounts!

          • snoons@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Ohhh that would make sence for the price. I was thinking of finding some steel pipe to cut down to size.

  • FreeBeard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Do people think that the Aeropress is the ultimate coffee maker? Because if not, why pay the premium? I have one as well and I love it for the 20€ it costs me. For 170€ you could get a decent filter machine. Do people not Google for alternatives?

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      24 hours ago

      It’s all just personal preference, but yes, many people do think it’s the best way to brew coffee. Some people think it gives you microplastics, but it can’t be substantial. If it were substantial you’d see your aeropress wearing away. Washing after your done should keep the amount low, if it were measurable at all.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        If it were substantial you’d see your aeropress wearing away.

        Exactly. People want to be afraid. That’s what the internet is good at.

      • snoons@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        You don’t need to see wear marks. Microwaving food in plastic containers is enough to cause contamination. Likely the same when filling with hot water; although, haven’t seen studies specifically focused on that, I don’t think the thicker walls will do much to limit contamination. This is also not considering the plunger.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Yeah, I’m aware. It’s just not going to be a substantial source. Microwaving in cheap plastic containers is much higher heat for a longer time, and it’s usually flimsy plastic designed to be thrown away. Those containers always warp as they’re degrading. I’ve never seen an aeropress warp. The condition of the plastic does not seem to be effected in any noticeable way. I’m sure you do get a non-zero amount of microplastics, but our water has a non-zero amount of microplastics. We’re well beyond the point of worrying about tiny amounts.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        If aero press gave anyone microplastics, which no one even knows what that is, then they would wear out. I’ve had one in daily use for 15 years.

        Microplastics are Reddit fear.

      • FreeBeard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Now I wonder in what kind of packaging these people buy their coffee. And how they filter their water…

      • FreeBeard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Yes, it looks like I underestimated how much people want to avoid having their food touch plastics. I would get a really nice ceramic poor over for half that price though.

        • beeng@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          True, I’ve got a nice ceramic hario but I do have to say aeropress is a bit different and more versatile.

      • FreeBeard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Isn’t the rubber lid under the highest mechanical stress? What material did they choose there to avoid plastics?

        • leriotdelac@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Not a specialist, but I guess that friction would rub off microplastics both from the lid and the main part, and of the main part is metal, it eliminates that part at least.

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 hours ago

            And, the mystery plastic would some how get past the paper filter (micro cellulose!).

            Aero presses don’t wear out.

            This thread is giving me microplastics.

      • FreeBeard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        But the water filter and kettle aren’t. I get that it is a niche thing but someone who affords a 170 stainless tube probably doesn’t have an issue like this.