• Zos_Kia@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    That’d be hilarious because they promised a bazillion data centers and barely delivered 3 and now 1 might get bombed.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    When Money is the controlling power of a nation (even when the political façade of that nation is Democracy) it makes sense for those the power controlling the nation attacks, to respond by going after Money.

    By the way, this doesn’t just apply to nations at war, but also to civil society groups within nations were the greatest power is Money.

  • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Oh no! Anyway…

    Escalation potential or a bluff?

    If I’m analysing this right, it’s neither.

    Iran is clearly trying to break the alliance network between USA, its vassal state Israel, and their allies, both other governments and corporations. And it’s doing so by showing that:

    1. Those alliances don’t benefit USA’s allies. For example, showing that USA won’t defend them when they’re attacked, and instead will run away with tail between legs.
    2. Those alliances cost too much to USA’s allies. For example, corporations put their investments at risk by simply being associated with the United-Statian government. (Remember corpos don’t give a fuck about human lives, but they do care about money.)

    The news is an example of #2. From Iran’s PoV the best outcome is OpenAI cutting ties with the rogue state; the second best is to get rid of its tendrils in the region. So the goal is not escalation, but the threat needs to have some bite so it can’t be a simple bluff. Also note Iran already attacked AWS data centres so…

    I also don’t think indiscriminate killing is part of Iran’s goals (unlike USA’s and Israel’s) so issuing a pre-emptively warning lets people to evacuate the region. This also helps to further disrupt operations so it’s a win-win.

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          cellular command structure, complete control of the straight with an army that has 1/100th the budget, less than a quarter of the naval fleet of the US, 1/30th the airpower, and has hardly any support in the region compared to pretty much all of europe and the Middle East actively providing support to the US. The U.S. has claimed multiple times it’s stopped Iran’ss ability to fight and that hasn’t been true a single time.

        • Zos_Kia@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          They’re bashing millions of dollars in equipment with tens of thousands of dollars in equipment. There is absolutely positively no way for them to win the war but they can make it so prohibitively expensive as to be untenable. That’s the only strategy that ever worked against imperial armies.

    • Mothra@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      So what you are trying to say is that the leadership in Iran is using their brain cells and the USA leadership isn’t

  • barnaclebutt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Oh no. Don’t. Not Open AI. Sam Altman is such a cool dude. Just don’t also blow up beloved Jared Kushner at a meeting with his bribe fund too. Or, finally release the Epstein files. All those things would be terrible. Just leave the AI alone. I need RAM prices to be absurdly high otherwise I’ll have fun.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The allies, in WWII had a similar choice. They decided not to kill Hitler. At that point he was making enough mistakes that his replacement would be sufficiently more competent to outweigh the benefits.

      Right now, Iran is a quite limited war. Going after trump would massively escalate it. Iran doesn’t want mushroom clouds over multiple cities.

    • rem26_art@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yeah same, I kinda just thought they were building it in Texas or something. But apparently, its being built in Abu Dhabi

      • setsubyou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        That’s because it was announced as a US AI infrastructure project that would generate jobs in the US etc. They started looking into other locations really quickly. But I guess a lot will still be in Texas.

  • BillyClark@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Interesting concept. Large countries are controlled by wealthy people and corporations, but even a small country has more resources than many larger businesses. So, a small country can threaten businesses that control a larger country in order to influence the larger country.

    So, there are two outcomes that I can see. Either the larger country is played by the smaller country, or the larger country pays even more to the business, causing further inequality and dissatisfaction among the masses. Or I guess the large country could abandon the business. So that’s three obvious possibilities.