• billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m not sure I want an ATC throwing a controller at the radar screen trying to land the plane I’m on.

  • k0e3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    I was under the impression that the FAA fired air controllers. Can’t they just rehire them?

    • ProbablyBaysean@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      That would be giving into unions or similar. They have to break the idea of rights so that every plane will remind you what they do to collective bargaining.

      That is the story the last time they broke the air traffic controller union, and it set the tone for unions for all the subsequent decades. I’m not sure what they are doing here.

  • Ænima@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    There’s already an online community of amateur ATC that have to learn, mentor, and prove they can do ATC for online flight sims. It’s not a bad take. Some of those folks get really good at the ATC speak and are usually trained by retired or current ATC. It’s amateur but those peeps are legit and take the tasks very seriously most of the time.

    Source: I once looked into doing this but quickly got overwhelmed.

  • AeronMelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    3 days ago

    ATC: “N3407 Heavy, proceed left to enter a holding pattern.”

    Pilot: “The runway is directly beneath me to my right, why don’t I just go right?”

    ATC: “That’s a great idea, N3407 Heavy. Proceed right to collide with FedEx 005 Heavy.”

    Pilot: “…N3407 Heavy, proceeding left to enter holding pattern, over.”

    ATC: “You’re a genius.”

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 days ago

      as hilarious as this sounds, I can totally see communication cutting and the pilot only getting the first part and missing everything after the callsign

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          3 days ago

          As opposed to what? It’s wireless communication; you don’t get a choice about whether it can fail or not.

          • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            well not without some sort of AI-powered tech inside, that’s all it’s missing. obviously

          • Rolder@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            From what I’ve heard if two people talk at the same time they cancel each other out. Plus, neither side can confirm if the other side heard them. I’d think some sort of text based system where you can acknowledge that you received the direction would be better.

              • Rolder@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                I’ve watched enough airplane accident videos to know that they don’t say over. Also it can result in one side literally not hearing the other side at all

                • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  How does saying over result in not hearing the other?

                  Also, you say “roger” to confirm you heard something. If the other side doesn’t say roger, you repeat the transmission or say “sayback” to have them confirm what they heard.

                  And if you missed a transmission or it wasn’t clear, you say “say again your last.”

            • minfapper@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              3 days ago

              orrrr, we use a voice based confirmation system. Like having the person repeat the important information back to them using the same radio.

              gosh, darn! That won’t work. Not enough AI or Blockchain. Silly me. Back to the drawing board…

  • reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 days ago

    That doesn’t seem like an awful idea, but what about targeting the folks who are like “ah yeah that’s the 4532 from boston” when a plane goes past overhead

    • EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The same reason foamers often don’t make it on the railroad. They cause safety issues getting distracted by the cool trains, and they become disillusioned seeing the reality of their obsession.

    • eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      There are like 15x the number of people who would want to do the logistics for train systems and would kick ass at it than there are jobs for that career.

      Solution: narrow gauge rails -everywhere-.

      • reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        I truly wish all large vehicles were on rails. I saw two pedestrians almost get hit in two separate crosswalks today.

        I’m honestly fine with traveling across an entire country taking a week or whatever (aka even without high speed rails).

        Wish we could all slow down.

  • JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    To ensure they’re at peak performance, they’re gonna need provisions to WFH in their underwear. Job needs to provide endless supply of hot pockets, Doritos, mountain dew, and Taco Bell gift certificates. And three daily 15-minute gooning breaks.