• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    One of his few good points, and it may be accidental is that it’s hard to sell a tax increase.

    My health insurance premium is way higher than my Medicare tax, so I can recognize that tripling the Medicare tax in my income bracket in order to support Medicare for all will actually save me money.

    But there are a lot of people who would stop at tripling the Medicare tax is bad. It would be a hard sell to get past that.

    The only real problem with tripling the Medicare tax is that it’s a fixed percentage and is capped, but really ought to be progressive with no cap

    • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s ONE of the MOST Difficult things to Tell people their Monthly costs will LOWER! Be LESS! SAVE Money! I cant’ even do it!

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Selling a good thing like Medicare for all is a skills issue at this point. And if we keep hiring Democrats who lack that level of communication skills, then don’t blame the voters for failing to know what is at stake.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s one of those things that boggles me. People will happily hundreds of dollars a month for a ‘service’ they barely use and is notorious for finding ways to not honor providing the service for any number of reasons.

      But the second you rephrase it as a tax, even a tax that would cost them less and provide them better services, they just don’t want any part of it and cling to the broken model like any kind of tax is an impediment of their rights.

    • droans@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      This is why the idea of “Medicare for those who want it” seems appealing to me. Until you reach a certain threshold (say, 70%), make both the tax and benefits optional.

      It’s not optimal by any stretch but it’s easier to sell it as an optional tax and benefit.

  • eurodyne@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    You dumb Cunt

    And to think, I helped get this guy elected to the Senate for his first term. I campaigned for this asshole. I canvassed. I had a lanyard. I had a clipboard. I knocked on doors. I convinced others to vote for him.

    I met him and shook his hand. and this motherfucker lied right to my goddamn face.

    I feel fucking dirty, and I feel disgusting for spreading that filth to others

    Edit: the Hakeem Jeffries wasn’t in front of the Javiz Center at the BLM protest… But I was and I can bring that fight to the next election… And the next. Didn’t bet on that did you, Hakeem? Well, fuck you. And fuck that horse of entitlement you rode in on.

    You know what else survived the NYPD crackdown at the Javits center? This watch (cracks courtesy of the NYPD):

    And this watch says your time has run out.

    • hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      I can only hope a lot of MAGA voters feel betrayed the same way. That pretty optimistic though, trump has his stupid cult of personality around him. Plus he’s actually following through on a lot of his campaign promises, unlike the lying dem mfs.

      • eurodyne@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        I saw a recent video of an interview with the Trump voter that said they regretted voting for Donald Trump because “ICE wasn’t hurting the right people“

        These people who voted for Trump are fucking sociopaths, just like Trump. they have nothing but hate in their hearts, and they voted for Trump because they wanted to hurt others. they voted for Trump because they believed he would be the agent of pain and destruction for fellow Americans that they did not like. people like you and me.

        It’s like that video of the old man crying on the news weeping because his Haitian wife got dragged off to the concentration camps, with him crying “but I’m a business owner! I voted for Trump three times! Why did he come after my wife?“ Why did you think you were special, asshole?

        THAT’S HOW FASCISM WORKS!!!

      • eurodyne@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        What I know is that the NYPD are fascist motherfuckers, and next time I’ll be better prepared to dodge a baton

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      8 days ago

      Calm down, guy, the Primary for NY district 8 ended already. Like it or not we want Jeffries to win in November, because even if you don’t believe his words you definitely shouldn’t believe the child rape and human cattle party that is the GOP.

      • eurodyne@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Calm down, guy,

        Reign it in, Cuntalicious— this story was from 2011-2012. Were you ever born then? Lmao.

        And just because Jeffries isn’t currently being challenged for his district, doesn’t mean he isn’t a Titanic piece of shit. It also doesn’t mean that you aren’t a Titanic piece of shit for trying to stick up for him. Really, what is he done that you are willing to defend? Fuck you.

        I bet you don’t even live in this district, ya poser.

        • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          8 days ago

          Him not being a Republican is still enough to defend with everything we have in November. He wants to reform the scotus and undo cuts to medicare and social security. We need him to win in Novemver so go get your fucking canvassing clipboard out.

        • fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          8 days ago

          You know, if you have a strong argument you don’t need to resort to aggression and name calling.

          • raze2012@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            8 days ago

            I don’t think this is an argument. OP has a personal vendetta with a high pfofile figure and telling him to “calm down we need him” doesn’t remove that betrayal. He wasn’t even disagreeing with the reply. Just asserting what we all already know in that Jeffries does not have the people’s priorities in mind.

            Him not being as bad as a literal nazi isn’t a high bar to meet.

          • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 days ago

            When I have a weak argument, I like to go with the “God told me I’m right in a vision, unbeliever” option. Works every time.

          • Lemmy World@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Research into rhetoric disagrees if the person is using themselves as part of the argument. If they bring in their credibility then an ad hominem is rhetorically the correct response.

            With that fun fact of the way, in this instance I think you are right.

    • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      The Overton window has shifted so far that this dude would be hard right anywhere else in the civilized world.

      We are the moderates. Current Dem leadership are regressive.

    • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      You gotta do both at the same time or you won’t get rid of either of them. If they act as a unified bloc we should treat them as such.

      • Major_Tsiom@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        In one fell swoop? We don’t have that choice, and even if we did, the numbers aren’t there. If it is a decision between a Republican and a centrist Democrat, I’ll take the centrist no contest. You have to vote for social democrats in the primaries first. In general elections, I just vote against Republicans.

        • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          The strategy you describe is concurrent, or as concurrent as it can be. If you’re a stickler for details it’s actually the reverse of the order of operations you laid out, since the primary comes before the general.

  • BillCheddar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    8 days ago

    Yeah man i fucking hate making sure americans can afford to live their goddamn lives and maybe spend some of that time with their families?

    No? Just work and missiles for war criminals? Fuck off.

    I hope you guys on the left understand the assignment is to retake the party from the dumb fucks in my older generation (Gen X specifically, but also the Boomers who haven’t croaked yet.) We think we know but we don’t. We/they are wrong. The center can win you a battle but it will never ever win the fucking war. Go win the war.

    • Malyca@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      They try to pull right because they are right, their only job is to make sure actual left never rises.

    • hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      All these people only care about their immediate families, rich buddies and hoarding as much property and wealth as possible.

      We need to stop having faith in them and rise up in action to establish true democracy.

        • hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          You’re right. Most of the people in this country probably need to pushed to the point of starvation to violently revolt. The problem is, who will be the first person to start? Trying to do it as one person is pointless.

  • TriplePlaid@wetshav.ing
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Instead, Jeffries argued Democrats should focus on making healthcare more affordable by reversing Republican-enacted Medicaid cuts and extending Affordable Care Act tax credits that he said have helped millions of Americans manage insurance costs.

    So basically he’s saying that now that Republicans hamstringed our healthcare, we should change our goals and just go back to how things were??? I feel like this is the most obvious it has ever been that establishment dems are NOT on our (the people’s) side.

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      TBF Jeffries cosponsored single payer bills for a decade. It’s probably a better indication of his specific decline rather than the party itself.

      Jeffries needs to win in November, though.

      • PepperoniNipple@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        You are so weird.

        • @FiniteBanjo - Almost 8k comments, 2 accounts, joined 8 months ago~
        • @UnderpantsWeevil - 24k comments, 1 account, joined 3 years ago~
        • @SatansMaggotyCumFart - Almost 15k comments, 9 accounts, joined 3 years ago~

        You three motherfuckers sound almost the exact same, with a few different quirks. American Exceptionalists who constantly try to convince people of supporting this system and this democratic party as is.

        I just saw UnderpantsWeevil commenting in this post about the USS Lincoln (https://lemmy.world/post/50817587) pretty much implying that Gavin Newsom is going to be the next president. What the fuck? The difference between him and you and Satan is that he seems to be a little pro-China. Satan hates China. I don’t know about you, but, you all overlap hard with the American Exceptionalism, you being some of the oldest active accounts I have seen in Lemmy ever since I joined it after the Reddit API fiasco, and the insane amount of activity all of you have in this platform.

        Do you even have a job or how the fuck do you three have so many comments here? And why the hell are you always trying to sway people to be pro-America no matter what? You still want America to be the “world police,” to meddle in other countries and whatnot. You are right now telling people that this Hakeem Jeffrey POS “needs to win in November” even after all the evil shit he says and does. Someone just posted a photo of him looking at Netanyahu like a wife, that’s the kind of evil corpo bootlicker monster he is.

        Why? Why can’t you instead tell people that they deserve better than this loser?

        I get your angle about not letting any republican in power, but what the fuck is this, man? Are you feds or something??

        • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          This mf over here writing novellas in the comment section while complaining about number of comments.

          • hraegsvelmir@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Probably because you publish a sheer volume of comments that rivals a coked up Stephen King’s output trying to browbeat people into not believing their eyes and ears when establishment Democratic figures are being as blatant as they can be in demonstrating they are not on the side of the people and will not be coming to help us, but fighting against us when it comes to down to it.

            It’s fucking exhausting to have every thread be full of you guys going “But see, he said he’d only break one of your arms and legs if he wins, not both of them!” as if that’s supposed to make people suddenly say, “You know what, that’s great, he’s got my vote.” when folks simply point out he’s said these things and wish that he would commit to not breaking any of our limbs if elected instead. “Ah, but harm reduction! The republicans will break both your arms and legs if they win.” Yeah, and assholes like Hakeem Jeffries will be holding you down while they do it to make sure they don’t miss while you squirm, thanks a lot.

              • hraegsvelmir@ani.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                Wow, you lack the attention span to read two small paragraphs, so that means anyone functionally literate is must be going and dipping into that AI well, too? Projection skills like that could probably land you a fine job at Imax, buddy.

      • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        He’s going to lose and people like you will blame the voters, but it’ll be his own fault.

        • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I would have liked for his opponents to run a proper primary against him and win, but now that he’s going to the general I support him 100% and I say any abstainers are morons for allowing the mere possibility of a GOP congressman.

  • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Hakeem Jeffries can fuck off. It’s been clear since day 1 of trump 2.0 that he’s a fucking hack, and here we are.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      He knows he will…

      He’s just trying to depress his own party’s turnout because he’ll say if we ran neoliberal candidates and had a neoliberal DNC we’d have done better.

      He won’t have a leadership position in February if Martin still has the DNC, and Jefferies would rather hand the government to trump for another two years than see progressives elect progressive congressional leadership.

  • Malyca@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    8 days ago

    Every corner of rot needs to be dealt with in this country, including controlled opposition.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    The first job of the new Dem Congress after the Midterm, is to immediately replace the MAGA comedy act of Schmuck & Jeffries. If they don’t work for the other side, they might as well be. Get rid of them.