• kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “If we didn’t create the evil misinformation bot, someone else would have. You should be happy it was a massive corporation that controls this patent, not some soulest unethical entity whose motives are profit over everything. That was a close one. Phew.”

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I hate the patent system so much. There’s already software that does this, all they did was add the word “live” in front. So now they own every live broadcast translation even though the techs been out to do it for a solid 2 years.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Patents aren’t given for what they do. They are given for how they do it. Two patents can exist for the same thing they do. But you cannot have two patents for the same mechanism by which they do it.

      That being said, if the patent is “make AI do it”… I’m not sure that is patent-worthy.

    • TeddE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Sadly, the way the system works is they can patent it. Maybe it won’t stand up to challenge, but the patent office is deliberately understaffed and underfunded to do a proper up-front review.

  • TrackenDaKracken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If it can be done, they will do it. Power is unconstrained by ethics, empathy, or morality. Never assume that anyone in power shares these traits with the rest of us, they do not.

    The only thing that constrains power is enforced laws with teeth.

    • Sabata@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      In America, we don’t enforce the law on those rich enough to pay congress.

  • Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    wow, way to go Microsoft. I am sure you market it with some bullshit like it helps you prevent live broadcast slips but we all know your wet dream is that fascist goverments line up in your doorstep to buy this tech. It will also remove any sort of accountability from news reporting. Someone can now say “Heil Hitler” on live tv and then say it was an AI fault. Not that they are fazed by such an expression in the US nowadays but you get the idea.

    • einlander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Or make anyone say ‘heil hitler’ to normalize the viewpoint and she everyone is ok with it.

  • Zarobi@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The patent also posits that such a tool could be used to remove filler words like “um” or “ah” from live speech, or to erase stutters or speech impediments.

    That’s kind of fucked up. Let people speak for themselves; don’t “”“improve”“” their speech without permission

    • reksas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 hours ago

      and it also makes it more difficult for people with speech impediments to speak. Imagine seeing absolutely no one have any speech quirks or anything and have some of your own, would you feel secure about opening your mouth? Then there is this handydandy tool, now you are mentally chained to it to even speak.

      LLM are just new chain on our necks that make us less free and able.

  • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Surely the researchers noticed the skulls on their caps and asked themselves if they were the baddies?

  • brsrklf@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Even when the goal isn’t misinformation…

    Removing filler words, personal and colloquial terms, replacing words for more appropriate ones according to an “internet search”.

    Who would be subjected to that willingly? Why even use a real human in the process at this point?

  • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I don’t see this being any good for anyone.

    But I am really pissed off that this can be patented. Even looking at the patent itself doesn’t look like anything new, its a series of flow charts.

    I see nothing novel or patent worthy here at all.

    • lischni_tschelowek@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I … see this being … good for anyone.

      … I am really [happy] that this can be patended. … Lookting at the patent itself it looks like [something] new, its a series of flow charts!

      I see [something] novel or patent worthy here … !

      [corrected by [Ad Usum Delphini [tm]]]

    • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Oh, it could be good if used responsibly. But that is not what is going to happen, isn’t it?

      (real time translation and giving people a way of dodging the social stigma attached to speech impediments are fine. Making sure someone with a stuffed nose sounds normal on Video is fine too. It could also be used to modify in-game videos to reference actions made by players, reducing the need to store multiple variants of a scene!)

  • oinari@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    11 hours ago

    A whole new level of fake news to come. Boomers won’t even know what hit 'em.

    • Buckshot@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Not even just boomers anymore. I get AI slop shared with me by all ages. I just tell people now assume nothing online is real.