• ByteJunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Companies already issue digital boarding passes. I have a government issued digital ID in a phone app. These are convenient.

    But facial recognition? Hell no, f that.

  • thejml@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    1 day ago

    passengers will also be able to upload their passports to their phone and travel through airports using their face for verification. Instead of manually checking in, which would let airlines know who intends to board their flights, airlines will instead be alerted when passengers arrive at the airport and their face is scanned

    They can’t even reliably scan a QR code, how can they pull that off with 100% accuracy?

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Y’all know the: “Please remove item from the bagging area” “Please wait for an attendent”

      But instead of self-check-outs, its airport security.

      “Face not recognized, please wait for an agent”

      You’ll wait 5 hours, you get strip-searched by border agents, and your plane already left, and no refunds.

      🫠

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        To be fair the bagging area issue is usually caused by a bad configuration, and usually weight based, not camera recognition.

        Different stores setup those systems with varying parameters, some are so strict that just regular product variances go outside their limits.

        • NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I think the lesson to be learned is that everything works in the demo (except when it doesn’t), but when it’s deployed to thousands of sites by the cheapest contractors, operated by untrained and unmotivated personnel, and not calibrated or maintained over its lifetime… the reliability goes down a bit.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 day ago

      This also means people wouldn’t be able to travel with cheap burner phones, which is extremely problematic for people who need to travel to and from increasingly authoritarian states.

      • Zier@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        24 hours ago

        It also means you are required to travel with a phone. Some people don’t own a cell phone because they don’t want one, need one, or can’t afford one.

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Is there a lot of overlap between people who can’t afford a cellphone and are taking flights?

          • nyan@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Not a lot, maybe, but in cases where someone else is paying for the flight, there may be some. And there are a fair number of older people who may be able to afford the plane ticket, but carry a dumb flip phone because that’s what they understand and can operate.

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Pshaw! Who wouldn’t want an expensive personal tracking and monitoring device?!

    • LeroyJenkins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      TSA in the States has already pulled it off. they use sources they already have like your current and past passport and ID photos for verification and do not store the pic they take when crossing TSA. that’s what the signs say at least. I guess it’s good enough for them already…

      • Rob1992@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Yeaaah iirc they will forever keep the fingerprints of anyone that wants to enter the USA

  • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    using their face for verification

    And here is where they underestimate how belligerent people can be.

    • WanderingThoughts
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      Then twins walk into the airport and the system crashes.

      And facial recognition has been known to fail with very dark skin so that’ll turn into a racial issue real quick.

      • cubism_pitta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        Uncle Tony on you tube likened air travel to jail… and I can’t shake it… I feel like a prisoner everytime I fly and HATE IT

  • OverTheFiniteSun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I do not like this. At all. Facial recognition and forced digitization? I’m disabled, and when I request assistance, I literally cannot use a digital boarding pass. And the favial recognition just seems like such a breach.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I gotta travel with my twin more often. I can 50-50 unlock his stuff. Let’s fuck this up.

  • crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Valérie Viale, the director of product management at Amadeus, a travel technology company, told the Times that the changes were “the biggest in 50 years”. She said: “The last upgrade of great scale was the adoption of e-ticketing in the early 2000s. The industry has now decided it’s time to upgrade to modern systems that are more like what Amazon would use.”

    Lmaooooo yes let’s that famously consumer-first megalith as our baseline

    • WanderingThoughts
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      Amazon of the “just walk out” shops powered by AI, that turned out to be s lot of Indian workers in the background.

  • itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    Every bit of this sounds like it’s own horrible idea and they just threw it all into one big horrendous pile of nonsense.

  • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    How delays and connecting flights are handled could also change. Under the technology being developed, passengers who miss connecting flights due to delays out of their control could automatically be sent a notification on their phones with details of their new onward flight. Their journey pass would automatically update and they would be allowed to board the new flight.

    This is the only part of that whole thing that sounds any good.

    • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      This isn’t new though, I landed after a long flight last year and had a notification asking me to confirm rebooking to another flight because mine was delayed.

      Turns out that no the flight wasn’t delayed and luckily I mentioned it when dropping my bag because a person had to sort it out for me and rebooked me back on my original flight that was on time. So now I don’t trust the technology at all.

    • Tanoh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      It says “could” not “will”, so they will just never implement that part.