What a monster! Making the lives of people better, like a maniac!
That’s some poor propaganda, comrade fox news. You should’ve rendered it in Arabic or Chinese to scare them out
This is the future that those who are controlling the conservative platform are trying to prevent.
Make no mistake this is and always will be a class war about stealing the value of workers for their own personal gain.
Democrat leadership is also not happy with Mamdani. He isn’t following the rules, like David Hogg, or AOC.
Fuck the establishment Democratic Party reps, run them all out of office because they will never get it. We need a new deal not conservative appeasement.
100%
Democrat leadership is tepid dogwater
Americans will just go “this guy wants to instate free healthcare, cleanse police corruption, and to stop bombing the middle east!” and expect you to reel back in disgust.
Because their MAGAt base will in fact reel back in disgust if any of those things are proposed. If “the libs” want it, then MAGA is programmed to hate it.
See how the fox piece looks? It has the politicians face, then they let MAGA know the guy is a “lib”, likely with the set up talking points. That is all MAGAts need, a face and to know the person is on the other side … from there anything else mentioned about the person is automatically bad.
In 3 years Fox news will just show a picture of the political opponent’s face with the caption “this guy is a lib” which will send every MAGAt into a murderous rage
I remember seeing video of a MAGAt rally. Trump vs. Biden election. They had a picture of Hillary up on the screen while the MAGATs chanted “lock her up”. I didn’t get it. She wasn’t running … it made no sense.
Like Emmanuel Goldstein in 1984
I’m just envisioning it like a John Wick style contract being issued when Fox News does the bit and every magat’s phone starts going off with the notification… I don’t want this timeline…
In this case all they needed to know he’s bad is to hear his name unfortunately.
Groupthink is a real thing
and its evolved over the last few decades.
Fox News saw the two minutes of hate and thought “why only two minutes?”
I’m seriously shocked the Fox media team didn’t bother photoshopping horns on his head, distorting his pleasant, lovely smile into a menacing grimace, or altering his skin color into the brimstone-red spectrum.
Here’s how I think they see this:
Landlords will go out of business. For-profit grocery stores will go out of business. People I don’t know won’t suffer (there’s even more letters at the end and I don’t know what they mean; that scares me). Businesses will have to pay more to operate, therefore prices will rise for me to protect profits. Brown people will still be where I have to see and interact with them.
Conservatives are fearful. They think when someone gets something good, it’s by taking from them. Fuck 'em.
Brown people will still be where I have to see and interact with them.
They don’t even try to hide their racism anymore.
Look at this monster.
You know they’re mad
Yes but many of these would require taxing the rich, which I’m against because I might somehow become rich one day through virtually no effort or understanding of how one becomes rich to begin with
/s
That’s it right there. Just mentioning the phrase tax the rich has become enough of a catalyst for the punching down to intensify. Keep the pressure on.
Access to food, transportation, housing, it’s almost like he thinks the job of government is providing decent infrastructure.
Or “insur[ing] domestic Tranquility,…promot[ing] the general welfare.” The Founding Fathers are spinning in their graves.
General Welfare, sir! o7
Its crazy that NYC still can’t afford free public transportation. City literally has more expensive apartments than yearly cost of operating busses.
The point is you need pretext to remove people who use the system as a living room instead of transit.
Sure but why would a fee do that? If anything that would encourage this behavior because if I pay 2$ I feel entitled to spend there as much time as I want.
This is pretty well established theory now in behavior economy:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motivation_crowding_theory
We already invented the most effective and humane fix for this - social workers. I don’t think anything can work better then another person trained in handling social situations correcting the issue themselves.
Free buses aren’t something you really need to “afford” because even in smaller cities the economic value returned through that way of operating is given back and then some. Like, they’ve been throwing free money on the ground for decades upon decades and it’s about time shit catches up to reality.
Bus fares make up only like 2% of the income for my cities public transit system. They can afford to go free.
Right but I think you’ve missed my entire point somehow. Literally it is cheaper to not charge anything for transit. You don’t need to afford it, you just have to do it. It is free money, understand?
Hi I’m a socialist transit worker and I thought free bus fare was a no brainer until I worked in transit, it’s an awful idea. Transit cannot function effectively as transit when it is being forced to operate as a mobile shelter and bottle and wagon transit system. Fund shelters and ease the burden shouldered by transit.
(By all means make transit incredibly inexpensively accessible to anyone who needs it)
I apparently wasn’t clear enough here, I’m sure there are places where free transit works great because people are so well cared for and general safety is so high that it’s not an issue. That sounds wonderful, I want that here. However, I have learned the hard way that transit needs to continue being accessible to the majority even when there are people who have slipped fully into the margins who present hazards to transit customers. (Customers meaning people who need transit to travel)
Point blank, that is not an issue caused by free transit. This is the logical equivalent of saying the school system is broken because people keep showing up to them with guns.
Point blank, the inability to deny people entry to transit and to use transit as a mobile shelter is having catastrophic impacts on overall transit use. This is the equivalent of saying the school system is broken because people keep showing up at schools and screaming at people, assaulting people, soiling themselves and the facilities and the staff have no ability to separate them or remove them from the school, so the rest of the students get home schooled or private schooled and effectively don’t have access to public school. (Oh yeah, and tons of teachers and staff quit)
They need HELP and a transit system as a shelter and drug safe use space is just about the least efficient way I can imagine to help them and makes it less safe and accessible to everyone else.
You can care and advocate for more than one thing, just so you know. Housing someone is less tax money on you personally than keeping them on the street costs and there are more empty living spaces than there are folks without a home.
But, go ahead and villainize the people with nowhere to go and no other option, they’re definitely the problem, aren’t they?
Edit: You’re literally just removed about your job and asking for this to not affect you personally. That’s a shitty as fuck take on the situation.
I feel like you didn’t actually read what I wrote. I ABSOLUTELY WANT THEM TO BE HOUSED AND CARED FOR. I am in no way villainizing them, this situation is not their fault. The reason we have a giant crisis of homelessness and drug use is not because we “let them”. The system needs to be fixed so that population can be helped and the numbers falling into that are cut. In the meantime though, we are doing nothing and it doesn’t work!
This is specifically a post about doing something. Notice that first box of words in the picture?
Yes… I was in favor of a lot of it… I was trying to educate people that there is more to the issue of free bus fare. Because I’m a transit worker who used to think free bus fare was a no brainer, but now believe it is unworkable without FIRST significantly improving other issues.
deleted by creator
Luxemburg has a great free transit system, what you guys need it to deal with homeless people and drug addicts. I mean this in a humanly way, where these people get the help they need.
Couldn’t agree more, a system where the number of homeless drug addicts and marginalized people is so low that we literally don’t need to worry about it sounds much better. But in the meantime the people who aren’t using the bus as a shelter have a civil right to access to safe and effective transit as well that they are currently not getting and transit is dying because of it. I have no illusions on the ways in which society has failed these people, they are largely foster kids who aged out of the system and people who were only a little on the margins but functional until rent went up AGAIN and they literally couldn’t afford to have a place to live anymore and spiraled from there. Free transit won’t fix that though, the interim period where free transit doesn’t function is very real and valid.
Also, seriously though, Luxembourg conservatively has less than a twentieth the poverty rate as the US.
well duh. that’s not a transit issue, that’s a shelter issue.
Agreed, the problem comes when the issue gets pushed from the shelter system onto the transit system.
Staten Island (the forgotten borough) has a free subway. It works pretty well.
Never been let alone worked in Staten Island, couldn’t tell you if there’s more to the story there or not. Sounds great though, hope it stays great. (I do think islands have a decent ability to be insulated from some amount of societal problems that tend to accumulate in city centers, I know the staten island ferry is free but it still may provide some barrier)
People act like $30/hr is high. Note this would be the mayor of NYC, so it would be raised for NYC only if he got his way. The cheapest place you can get to live on your own there I am finding is 2600 a month. So say you made 30/hr. That’s $62,400 working 40 hours a week. Take out Federal/state/city taxes ends up being around $46,112 take home. The place costed $31,200. Making the lowest rent findable in Manhattan 2/3 of $30/hr.
They wouldn’t be able to get approved to even live there if they tried. They would have to rent a room from someone else with a 4 bedroom place renting to 4 people for around $1200/ month. And share bathrooms/kitchen/living space with people. And they would still struggle to get by if they paid for health insurance, travel costs to and from work, food, and the whole living crap.
$30 isn’t radical for NYC, it’s like base needed salary… And hope you have a good stable relationship with someone else making the same, then maybe you can get your own place together, just don’t do something stupid like get pregnant because you can’t afford to not go to work, and can’t afford to put them in daycare so you would both have to uproot and move real quick finding jobs elsewhere.
Wait, we are gonna vote for a guy who is going to make renting a room more affordable?! COMMUNISM!! I WONT STAND FOR SUCH LUXURY LIVING CONDITIONS! /s
It says $30 by 2030. What is the term for Mayor? Is he promising something that literally cannot be done by him?
Minimum wage is current around $16 there. Standardly you put a plan in place with a set date and partial increases up to that day to allow companies time to plan and get ready. For instance the last time federal minimum wage increased, it rolled out as such
"The 2007 amendments increased the minimum wage to $5.85 per hour effective July 24, 2007; $6.55 per hour effective July 24, 2008; and $7.25 per hour effective July 24, 2009. "
7.25 was what they said they were going to go to, but rolled it out slowly to prepare everyone.
16-30 in a 4 year roll out makes sense
Wow, insane that it’s that low right now. Minimum wage in Seattle is $20.76 and grows based on inflation every year. It’s grown from $15 in 2017.
City owned grocery shops? I…wut. This breaks my mind. Not in WTF is this way, just how would this work. Curious how it will come out and hoping for the best.
It’s a pilot program for a few stores.
The city currently has a program where they’re paying private grocery stores to try and mitigate food deserts, but there’s so few strings attached it’s just free money to the shops.
He’s proposing ending that, and using the money to directly open grocery stores in food deserts run as city owned coops.
It’s not infringing on private business because they’re not operating in these areas anyway.
The city owns and runs the grocery stores. They’re not required to make huge profits and can therefore offer reasonable prices. They can buy directly from local suppliers, thus creating or securing local jobs. Basically, if you cut out all the bloodsuckers, things become much better.
Public grocery stores are a useful solution to food deserts without forcing high wages or ideologically preferred suppliers. It is a zero cost option in that the stores can sustain themselves. It is a big benefit to neighbourhoods and property owners in those neighbourhoods.
The thing is, actual capitalist theory suggests it wouldn’t “cut out” bloodsuckers at all. It would force them to compete but they would survive, presumably just fine.
A public option is definitely a socialist platform, but unless the government stores are allowed to operate at a loss indefinitely, supplemented by tax dollars, they pose NO real threat to those businesses, only to greedy gouging.
If there was a functioning market economy, none of this shit would be necessary in the first place.
There are already gov. owned stores in some states (liquor stores, but that’s close enough).
Jesus would NEVER Approve of ANY of these! AFFORDABLE housing? Jesus would BURN it to The Ground! PROTECTING your Neighbor? LAUGHABLE! This is the MOST Anti Jesus Platform EVER! Where’s the ELIMINATING Healthcare? Where’s the ELIMINATING Homes? Where’s the HURTING your Neighbors? Where’s the JESUS!
