• NotLemming@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    18 hours ago

    At what point will Tesla be ripe for a hostile takeover? We could rename it ‘woke’

  • blady_blah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    The would need to crash another order of magnitude for anything to happen. Tesla’s stock is crazy overvalued even now and the only justification for the over-valuation is the track record and insane over-promises of Musk. That’s the reality as investors see it. They will still bet on him until they’re thoroughly convinced that he’s not the golden child anymore.

      • Little8Lost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        With overvaluation its meant that they are the most valuable car manufacturer while having made the fewest cars (at least among the large ones and this is before tesla stock tanked)

        Most of the stockvalue tessla has is made from musk generated hype, not from the company making cars.

        I am not arguing about the car quality

  • johncandy1812@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    He’ll still own *the largest share of Tesla so it won’t change anything.

    *Corrected my post but the point remains: he controls the company and their image to such a degree he has to be asked to step away, all in an effort to improve his fortunes primarily.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Musk gets his money from Tesla, and somehow manages to control the company with his minority stake.
        The stock holder confirmation of the insane bonus to Musk is evidence of that.
        The other investors may be collateral damage. But that’s OK IMO, they support Elon Musk, otherwise they should have gotten out long ago.

        The wealth from Tesla is what gives Musk power.

        • bstix@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          somehow manages to control the company with his minority stake.

          … maybe his job as CEO at Tesla has something to do with that?

            • bstix@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Yes. They all bought into the same bubble. Even if they want to fire him as CEO, they’re afraid of the loss in case Musk sells off his stock. The next board meeting will be interesting.

        • Letsdothisok@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          … I don’t think Musk is relying on tesla alone. He has money coming in from everywhere. Hence, all of his inspired businesses.

          • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            19 hours ago

            The problem is that he also has debt, a large part of which is secured by Tesla stock. If that stock took a nosedive to 10% of its previous value, the owners of said debt might come calling.

            • Letsdothisok@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Lol yall love saying this about rich people you don’t like.

              " BuT but aLl oF HiS DeBt!"

              Yeah… it takes money to make money.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It’s a “publicly traded company”, not a “public company” - so a company where anybody who has the money to do so can buy shares in it, not a company owned by the state (which can be States, Regions, Municipalities, the Central Government and so on).

        Since a “public company” is one oned by the state, in a Democracy that means every citizen owns part of it and all have an equal share of ownership (via their electoral vote they chose directly or indirectly who manages the companies owned by the state), whilst a “publicly traded company” is only owned by some amongst the public (those who bought shares in it, which can only happen if they had the money to do so) and the sizes of each owner’s stakes are highly uneven with a few owning far, far, FAR larger fractions of the company than the vast majority (so, not at all a democratic system).

  • BossDj@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    My prediction is that musk will eventually step down blaming the terrorist left. He’ll use it for Twitter fodder for a while, then he will completely defeat the purpose by admitting on Rogan that he’s still getting all the money via a pass through person.

    • Aux@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why would he need a “pass through person”? Man, the ignorance of lemmings is incredible…

    • warm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      His real value is in SpaceX, unfortunately Tesla falling doesn’t hurt him much, he only owns 13% of Tesla, but has 42% in SpaceX with much greater voting power. He could take a golden parachute from Tesla, forget about it and use corruption to funnel US funds into SpaceX.

      But one thing it does hurt severely… his ego.

      • klep@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I think that Tesla stock was very heavily tied into the purchase of Twitter. I’m having trouble finding a source right now after Lutnik just encouraged Americans to buy Tesla stock.

        So Tesla stock plummeting could have a huge influence on his ownership of Shitter.

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          24 hours ago

          All the bullshit he’s causing makes me really want to move to the middle of nowhere and become Sasquatch, but then I would have to subscribe to Starlink to receive memes :(

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      If he resigned, kept his stock, and it was led by someone who actually increased the share prices, he’d make a lot of money.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Would people stop actions against Tesla in that case though? I am hoping we can destroy his wealth, so while him being CEO is a relevant factor, it’s far from the only one.

  • wirebeads@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    No. Don’t step down you Nazi pig. Ride this wage right down to bankruptcy. I do not want you to resign, keep your shares and earn more from it. You deserve nothing.

    Please stay on as CEO. I suggest everyone sell their Tesla shares. Not financial advice, but fuck f’elon, sell your stock.

  • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It’s a meme coin. Whether or not they sell cars is irrelevant (don’t invest in Tesla).

    Edit: The share price was 407 5th of November 2021.

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Tesla stock underwent a total of 2 stock splits.

      The most recent stock split occurred on August 25th, 2022.

      One TSLA share bought prior to August 31st, 2020 would equal to 15 TSLA shares today.