• piege@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It’s amazing the amount of ressources that are spent on creating an environment/platform that locks users in.

      Like, shit, if we spent like 10% on that efforts into open source stuff we’d be living in a utopia right now or something.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Kind of a two-fer right there. Without “AI” sucking up so much power, we’d already be better off climate-wise.

        • biofaust@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I wrote Generative AI. Do you want to put the two on the same scale of complexity?

            • biofaust@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I agree. Still it is a set with way fewer elements than action against climate change. Also, the nature of operations in the latter case is way more diversified than in the development of the former.

              It is only my opinion though, you may find Generative AI a hydra compared to the other.

              By the way, the money would be well spent indeed but not even close to enough for a sustainable change.

              • lime!@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                idk about that last part actually. some of the stuff we can do for the climate we just aren’t doing.

                also we could just hire a few hitmen

  • tauren@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m not sure what technology I would choose, but surely it would be related to the climate change.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m sure you’ll get a bunch of respectable answers, but keep in mind that secretly, everyone is actually thinking sex robots.

  • Phineaz@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Cultured Meat. Without relying on any major breakthroughs, a price competitive with “traditional” meat is feasible with a few rather reasonable and conservative assumptions and developments. Dropping cows as meat source globally alone might be sufficient to slow down further climate change significantly.

      • Phineaz@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Why would I need an immune system in CM? This is food. It’s cells, generally on a scaffold, that look like either ground meat or a steak or whatever you want. If you mean vasculature: That is an issue if you want to print organs or large, intact tissue, less so for foodstuffs.

        • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Lack of immune system means everything has to be perfectly sterile, it has been the entire problem with scaling up. Entire batches regularly rot.

          there is currently no viable solution to this, that’s why investors are backing out.

          • Phineaz@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Everything has to be perfectly sterile anyway, this is cell culture. Open tops STRs are not exactly a thing. It doesn’t have to be pharma grade, sure, but food safety is a thing and you’re not going to get a process certified without it. Main issue remains to be the cost of medium, serum-free or not.

            I do wonder where you got that idea from, though. I don’t intend to be rude, but have you got any kind of experience in the field?

            • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Yeah that’s the problem… farms don’t have to be sterile. scaling that up has proven to be almost impossible. Cost of the medium is just one of the problems

              I am very interested in the topic and follow it closely, here’s a recent video on the topic summarizing the problem made by a food scientist

              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPCnVwwENaQ

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Fusion power or cures for diseases.

    Fusion power, should it work, would solve a lot of problems. Environmentally, in particular, but if we could get a decent distribution of reactors around the planet we’d alleviate food problems, water problems, and a whole bunch of suffering of one kind or another. Cheap power would help a lot.

    Otherwise, anything to help cure diseases. Genetic, auto-immune, cancers, misfortune, whatever. Alleviate more suffering, let people live and work again.

  • skarn@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Energy storage. We could already produce all the power we need and more using solar power, the problem is that we can’t store it in an efficient energy dense form. The word efficient there is doing some heavy lifting. It needs be comparable or better than our methods today in terms of cost, safety, energy density, climate impact. If we could solve energy storage, it’d change society and technology dramatically.