• Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    3 days ago

    This isn’t a meme, do it.

    M - Mandatory

    I - Indefinite

    T - Term

    C - Coverage

    H - (for) Hospitalization

    The MITCH act is a guarantee for your employment, salary and relief from any required government service/appearance, for the duration of time required for you to fully heal and recover from injury/illness, in home or medical facility, while under the active care of a licensed physician.

    P.s. And since we are requiring that doctor as well, we’re going to need to just offer universal healthcare for all as an add on, m’kay.

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Don’t stop there.

      My grandfather was at one point a regional manager for a coffee distributor. He got cancer. The company was self insured in such a way that they had to foot his medical bills. They did.

      Post recovery, my grandfather describes his remaining time with the company as miserable. For example, they reassigned him to a notoriously bad region while not providing any relocation assistance. Expectation likely being that he would underperform as a remote manager for their worst region. He didn’t.

      Following about six months of a toxic work experience, they took him out to dinner to let him know in public that his role was being discontinued. He wasn’t being fired, but he’d be required to accept a demotion into a sales position if he wanted to stay. He did not stay.

      Decades later, one of the C-suite members retire. My gramps was close with this guy, who could not speak “off the record” until now. The guy said that C-suite had it out for gramps, viciously so. They wanted him to quit, because they knew that cancer often comes back. They did not want to pay another set of medical bills, so they made gramps life miserable to try avoiding the potential expense.

      So, how do you protect people like my gramps in this situation?

      Your solution is still better than nothing, but it should go further.

        • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Even without, employers if unregulated may see any longterm treatment that takes you out of work as a liability purely for the costs to keep them on payroll.

          Unionization or worker-owned corporations could overcome this. Ideally both, at the same time.

          I want to create a system where the unregulated state of affairs naturally tends toward ethical behavior. That would be nice. But I also want regulation.

      • Bilb!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yet another reason to be dissatisfied with employer provided health insurance. They want to be the provider of health insurance coverage so that its availability can be used as leverage against workers, and if you need to actually use in any significant way you’ll be punished.

      • psivchaz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        That sucks. Yet somehow it seems like one of the better outcomes in America. I feel like now they’d just find some reason to fire the person or lay them off and thus not cover the medical bills to begin with. Hell, my wife was fired during the maternity leave the company offered because she actually took it rather than I guess just being so grateful that she worked through it.

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yes.

    Unfortunately, conservatives believe in hierarchy. There are different rules for different people and, to them, that’s good, right, and natural.

    They don’t see it as a contradiction because to them it is not. Mitch gets time off because he’s special and deserves it.

    Without cracking that world view, progress will be very limited.

    • Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is what people don’t get.

      Republicans love being stepped on because those doing the stepping are rich and therefore smarter and therefore in a higher social bracket and therefore allowed to do whatever they want. They only care when they specifically are the ones in the crosshairs. No amount of empathy politics or fairness matter, because they “earned” their right to be an asshole (by cheating and exploiting labor, but they arent ready for that conversation)

      • jtrek@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        I remember a video from (I think) the alt right playbook series, where he remarked on how this kind of hierarchy is self similar at different levels. They get stepped on but they also get to step on the people below them. That’s part of why they don’t like things that help people they see as lesser. They need to stay down so they can be stepped on!

    • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Unfortunately, conservatives believe in hierarchy.

      indeed, same everywhere, eg wages, some C suite being paid $50Mil is not a problem, they deserve it after all, a raise in the minimum wage ? heresy!

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      You crack that worldview by making them the losers in it. So if you work with a conservative, you make sure they don’t get their days off. You make sure that every single bad thing they do they need to count for or they get fired. This is really easy. The problem is is that people on our side have all this empathy for assholes.

      • jtrek@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        That might work, but having just read “Dying of Whiteness” I worry it wouldn’t. There are people who would literally rather die than upset the hierarchy. They know their place in it. They will do their duty.

  • balderdash@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 days ago

    Democrats will call this a fringe idea even though European countries already do it. The overton window has shifted; we consider far-right policy (like building a wall across the border) but we can’t afford universal healthcare and parental leave.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      The overton window has shifted

      Hardly on it’s own.

      A ton of money goes into telling Americans that they can’t afford vacation or sick leave. Even as a ton more goes into telling us that AI will be replacing our jobs momentarily.

      • TheSambassador@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Which is inself so fucking absurd. Can you imagine spending money to convince other people to work harder? Like, as a concept to itself it’s so absurd.

      • balderdash@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yeah the billionaires are working overtime. Probably easy to do when you have more money than some countries.

        edit: I don’t mean they literally are working hard. I mean they stand against worker’s rights.

        • qarbone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          They work “overtime” because they log every meal as working and having an idea at 2am, while trying to ignore the ghosts of hell screaming at them, demanding they repent, as overtime.

  • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Also, if you’re missing from work for months as an elected official it should automatically trigger a special election to replace you. If I get fired for not showing up, they should too.

      • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        Lmao, as if they’d wait a day. I’ve seen multiple people get fired for “No call, no show” that same dag when management forgot they gave them the day off

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’ve seen the opposite. Hiring is such a nightmare that some managers will turn a blind eye for days - even weeks - if the employee isn’t critical and the hiring process is sufficiently bureaucratic.

          I remember hearing an employer begging people to come in, because he’d been saddled with flakey teenagers who weren’t paid enough to give a shit one way or another.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      If I get fired for not showing up

      Technically, FMLA is supposed to prevent this from happening. You’d go on disability if you were out for months. But your employer couldn’t fire you without opening themselves up to Wrongful Termination.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 days ago

    Hey. It’s the kid that survived a school shooting and has worked to make our nation better ever since, even after knuckledragger Marjorie “Neanderthal” Greene stalked and harassed him in public.

  • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    A really good idea to build upon this is to set the amount of paid time off to same amount of time to who over has the most absentism in Congress.

    Your local representative hasn’t shown up to vote in four months. Now, everyone in America gets four months of paid time.