• AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    If there were two candidates I could vote for, one of them saying they would establish universal healthcare but allow private insurance to continue; and one who would establish universal healthcare and promise to abolish private insurance - I would emphatically vote for the latter.

  • tamal3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Fuck the NYT. I unsubscribed the moment they started shit talking Bernie back in the day.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Freedom for all would abolish private slave ownership and trade. There’s no precedent in Roman history.

    This is how dumb arguments like this one sound. Only a genocidal maniac could unironically spew nonsense like this.

  • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Most people are missing the subtext on this: they’re saying you’d wipe out an entire industry overnight and literally millions of people would be unemployed overnight. Given the pisspoor state of the welfare system in America this is actually a fairly serious issue that must be accounted for whenever a transition actually occurs. It also means a huge block of potential voters, anyone who works for Cigna, Aetna, Kaiser permanente, bcbs, etc, is going to be far more likely to oppose any such changes. Plus other related industries like medical billing and families that are dependent on these incomes

    This doesn’t mean we shouldn’t transition asap of course, it just means there’s a complex set of issues to navigate that honestly are never touched upon by people who propose healthcare reform. That’s how you know they aren’t serious. Either they’re proposing a system that props up these companies (ala Harris) which means the costs of medical care will not appreciably improve (America pays an insane amount of admin costs especially relative to other countries, like 5-7x as much). Or they are mentioning it with no intention to make it happen

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Also, even with countries that have a public option private insurance is usually still allowed. There are zero good arguments against it and a lot of superfluous nonsense meant to muddy the waters.

  • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    “Quitting predatory business practices would abolish all predatory businesses!”

    Oh no. Anyway…

    • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yeah but you see, for that there is precedent in American history.

      Abolish NYT? There is probably precedent for that too.

  • Amberskin
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s peak ignorance. Plenty of countries with universal heathcare have a thriving private medical insurance industry. The thing is they cannot force the scam level prices they do in the US, because private insurance is a ‘nice to have’ instead of a ‘must have’ thing.

  • ZMoney@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    There is a precedent and it’s called the VA. The military is the largest socialist organization in the US.

  • Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Someone needs to think of the shareholders who would need to sell their mega yachts because of this madness.

    • Uranus_Hz@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I am 100% in favor of universal health care. But as a realist I also recognize there are millions of people who work in the health insurance industry who would become unemployed. So that is an issue that would need to be addressed as well. Because a massive increase in unemployment depresses wages for everyone.

      • Avicenna@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Replacing private insurance with medicare would likely need lot of office work and infrastructure so it could absorb some of it. They might also be allowed to transform into smaller scale companies that outsurce their services to the government for these purposes (though they would likely need to downsize). After working in such a hell hole though, some of them might need some workshops in empathy.

        In any case agreed they should look out for folks affected by such a fallout but CEOs and upper management can go lip up Trump’s diarrhea for all I care.