• Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I know how machine learning “AI” works, and there, the training is the costly part, using it is close to free.

    Could someone knowledgeable explain what’s the difference with those more recent large language models used by ghatgpt etc. ?

  • ignirtoq@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The first statement is not even wholly true. While training does take more, executing the model (called “inference”) takes much, much more power than non-AI search algorithms, or really any traditional computational algorithm besides bogosort.

    Big Tech weren’t doing the best they possibly could transitioning to green energy, but they were making substantial progress before LLMs exploded on the scene because the value proposition was there: traditional algorithms were efficient enough that the PR gain from doing the green energy transition offset the cost.

    Now Big Tech have for some reason decided that LLMs represent the biggest game of gambling ever. The first to find the breakthrough to AGI will win it all and completely take over all IT markets, so they need to consume as much as they can get away with to maximize the probability that that breakthrough happens by their engineers.

    • ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yeah, I ran some image generators on my RTX2070, and it took a solid minute at full power to do it. Sure, it’s not a crazy amount, but it’s not like it’s running on your iPhone.

      • Match!!@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        you can get a very small generator running on a modern phone if you want a grainy 400x400 piece of anime trash

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          there aren’t many games that tax your gpu like inference, where it’s pegged for the entire time. i have a power usage tracker on my desktop because my gpu is stupidly powerhungry, and it uses way more power doing inference than playing a modern graphics-intensive game.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    At the moment AI is consuming about 3x as much total power as gaming (60 terawatt hrs/yr vs 20), so presumably 3x more environmental impact. So my question is, if one thing is 3x worse does it make the other thing okay? I mean, it seems fair that the power consumption should make us roughly 1/3 as outraged by gaming as we are by AI.

    B-b-but…

    • Decq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      The outrage is no comparable because games aren’t forced down your throat. I’ve never once asked for an AI summary of something, yet I see them constantly if I don’t actively avoid them, so I’m indirectly incurring those costs.

      • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Outrage for other people’s environmental effects because they’re “forcing it down your throat” but not your own because you’re doing it willingly? Yeah, that sounds super morally impeccable!

        • Decq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          I never said i was outraged or not. But at least when i game and being morally deplorable, I’ve actively chosen to do so with intent. That’s still way better than them deciding for me to waste the energy when i don’t even use the result. If you don’t see the difference there isn’t much to talk about here.

          • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 minutes ago

            Youi’re right that there isn’t much point in this conversation, but completely wrong about the reason. I’m saying if people are upset about the amount of power AI is using they should be at least 1/3 as upset about the power gaming uses. You’re saying the bigger issue is AI doing something on your behalf without asking. I don’t even know how to address an issue-dodging mentality like that. Oh well.

        • Decq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Hence why I said if I don’t actively avoid them. I used those services before AI was a thing. So it was not my decision.

    • snf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hmmm, is this true? The fact that AI corpos are talking about standing up brand new power plants just to keep their GPU farms running makes me a little dubious of this claim. I don’t remember Ubisoft ever being that desperate for wattage

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        If you do the math, which I’ve posted here, you can see it’s true. This is a situation where hundreds of SUV drivers are sitting in traffic, see a large bus bellow out a large puff of diesel smoke, and think, “Wow buses are bad for the environment.”

        People are bad at math. They don’t see their individual contributions add up to really bad things.

        • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Damn, I didn’t realize video games were so bad. I guess we should ban both, then. Whether for AI or Gran Turismo, people just shouldn’t have a graphics card newer than 2008.

      • jsomae@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Seems more like “putting things in scale” than “whataboutism.” I’m not sure I agree with the premise, but I don’t think it’s whataboutism at all. Whataboutism would be “it’s fine, because something else is worse,” whereas I think the commenter is trying to say “it’s not much, since it’s less than something else that isn’t much either.”

        • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          They give analogies elsewhere about buses blowing big fat gas loads in front of SUV drivers, so if this is what they’re doing at all, it’s only because they’re floating between opinions, happily landing on whichever one happens to be more useful.

          I believe they would say both are insignificant—but also!—video games are worse, so… you know, if you think electricity waste is bad, really you’re the problem, hippie.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Is it wrong to point out hypocrisy? Is also it wrong to mock SUV owners who complain that buses burn gasoline/diesel?

        • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Arguments from hypocrisy are lazy jabs made by people too cowardly to take a strong stance on anything. Be affirmative: Do you think buses burn too much gasoline?

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        Gpt 4 had a training cost of $78 million. Gta5 cost $300 million. 4000 developers each with the latest GPU burning hundreds of watts per employee to create the assets. A rough estimate of 750watt pc, 4,000 developers, 8 hour a day, 300 days a year, 5 years = 36 giga watt-hours.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-4

        https://gamerant.com/rockstar-games-with-longest-development-cycles-ranked/ https://www.tweaktown.com/news/88292/over-6-000-people-worked-on-grand-theft-auto/index.html https://www.sportskeeda.com/gta/how-long-take-make-gta-5-a-brief-history-game-s-developmental-cycle

        Off topic: while trying to find my post where I did the math I discovered that Blue Morpho is the name of an AI company. God damn it. AI ruined my Venture Bros reference.

        • SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          2 days ago

          Except their GPUs wouldn’t be at 100% power all the time. Most of that time will be with programming, texture artistry, planning mechanics etc. I have a feeling that “back of the napkin” calculation is incredibly inaccurate.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            2 days ago

            100% power all the time

            A gaming PC uses more than 750 watts. Plus there’s AC cooling for that which doubles the total power usage. So 750 watts includes not using the CPU all the time. Then there’s the testers on the development team which greatly outnumber the coders. Testers are using the GPU the entire time they’re working.

            Lastly the cost comparison of the Rockstar developing GTA5 vs OpenAI training ChatGPT includes all the energy costs because they had to pay for everything. OpenAI is 2k developers compared to Rockstar 4k so it’s not just salaries that make up the difference.

        • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          Ignoring the shitty quick maths. Those are energy costs of employing people. Those programmers and artists won’t stop needing AC and a computer if you get rid of the videogame industry, they’ll move to another industry with AC and computers.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah, but Game development does use more energy than a typical office worker. However even treating it as a regular office worker, the training costs are equivalent to 3k office workers but the results of the training are used by far more than 3k. So the energy use of the training is divided by millions of users.

            • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 days ago

              So you’re saying that GTA VI is only going to be used by the developers?

              And how does tech companies putting AI results on every interaction of mine count as a user? I never read their bullshit, yet it’s all over my screen, wasting both insane amounts of energy and valuable screen space.

        • jsomae@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m skeptical that those 4k developers are using their entire GPU for 8 hours a day. I would be surprised if even 10% of the brain GPU was being used. Though there are CI servers running ontop of that, but typically much fewer than there are developers. I would estimate 5 GWh as a liberal upper bound.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            If you scroll further down, I did the math assuming that it wasn’t even a gaming company and got 18 GWh.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        People do bad things for the environment all the time. It’s hypocritical to drive around in a big SUV (4080 gaming GPU) and mock people driving a minivan because cars are bad for the environment.

            • _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              You just copy and pasted the same crap you gave to everyone who replied without even reading what I said, there was no hypocrisy in what I said, therefor you missed the point and I have no reason to explain myself to you.

              • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                Stop lying. Using the same car analogy isn’t a copy and paste.

                Doing something that sucks more while complaining about those that do things that sucks less is hypocrisy.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      sure, while we’re splitting hairs let’s ban all computers worldwide because they are the cause of the huge increase of energy needs.

    • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      At least human beings get paid to do that and presumably at least some of the people playing the games enjoy the experience.

      The concept of a video game also isn’t fundamentally built on consumer deception, either.