Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

  • swlabr@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    Ā·
    54 minutes ago

    Musk objects to the ā€œstochastic parrotā€ labelling of LLMs. Mostly just the stochastic part.

  • maol@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    Ā·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I have become aware that there is a very right wing Catholic podcaster who has a Catholicism AI chatbot app. It’s called Truthly.

    Your Trusted Catholic AI Conversation Companion Deepen your understanding, explore ideas, and engage in meaningful dialogue—anytime, anywhere.

    If someone could call up Pope Leo and get him to excommunicate the guys who invented this, that would be great.

  • swlabr@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    Ā·
    7 hours ago

    Can’t find the angle to spin this out into a grown-up buttcoin post, but if I did, the title would be ā€œHorse_ebuttsā€.

    Anyway: recently I’ve been burdened with the knowledge that there’s a bunch of horse racing related crypto companies. They’re all obviously terrible.

    • Zed Run: a play to earn (P2E) virtual horse NFT racing game. Defunct as of February, probably due to rug pulling, they are pivoting to ā€œZed Championsā€, which is… pretty much the exact same thing, with likely the same fate.
    • EquineChain: a blockchain platform for tracking horse care history, because apparently people don’t trust horse caregivers and need GPUs to remember how much ivermectin and ketamine their show-ponies have mainlined.
    • BTX Racing: a blockchain platform for buying stake in horses. Not sure if you get to choose which cut of the horse you own. Also, not sure if when you liquidate your equine tranche you get cash or a bucket of glue.

    Also, insert obligatory stablecoin reference here.

    • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      Ā·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Zed Run: a play to earn (P2E) virtual horse NFT racing game. Defunct as of February, probably due to rug pulling, they are pivoting to ā€œZed Championsā€, which is… pretty much the exact same thing, with likely the same fate.

      They’re also (indirectly) competing with Umamusume: Pretty Derby, which offers zero P2E elements, but does offer horse waifus and actual entertainment value. Needless to say, we both know who’s winning this particular fight for people’s cash.

      EquineChain: a blockchain platform for tracking horse care history, because apparently people don’t trust horse caregivers and need GPUs to remember how much ivermectin and ketamine their show-ponies have mainlined.

      It’d arguably be helpful if the caregivers are helping themselves to the stash, but I doubt there’s anything stopping then from BSing the blockchain, too.

      • swlabr@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        They’re also (indirectly) competing with Umamusume: Pretty Derby, which offers zero P2E elements, but does offer horse waifus and actual entertainment value. Needless to say, we both know who’s winning this particular fight for people’s cash.

        It’s almost as if people don’t want to spend money on bland low-poly 3D models of horses and would instead prefer waifu art with surprisingly intricate character design that I definitely do not know anything about*

        *I actually do not, but for the bit, pretend that I do and am being defensive

        • Sailor Sega Saturn@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          5 minutes ago

          I can honestly say that I have never played Umamusume Pretty Derby because on my PC the sound keeps cutting out and the cutscenes don’t play which greatly disappointed me.

  • blakestacey@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    Ā·
    13 hours ago

    https://metr.org/blog/2025-07-10-early-2025-ai-experienced-os-dev-study/

    When developers are allowed to use AI tools, they take 19% longer to complete issues—a significant slowdown that goes against developer beliefs and expert forecasts. This gap between perception and reality is striking: developers expected AI to speed them up by 24%, and even after experiencing the slowdown, they still believed AI had sped them up by 20%.

    womp, hold on let me finish, womp

    • froztbyte@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      had a quick scan over the blogposts earlier, keen to read the paper

      would be nice to see some more studies with more numbers under study, but with the cohort they picked the self-reported vs actual numbers are already quite spicy

    • V0ldek@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      Ā·
      14 hours ago

      What’s the standard advice to give them?

      It’s unfortunately illegal for me to answer this question earnestly

    • lagrangeinterpolator@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      Ā·
      16 hours ago

      Username called ā€œThe Dao of Bayesā€. Bayes’s theorem is when you pull the probabilities out of your posterior.

      ēŸ„č€…äøčØ€ļ¼ŒčØ€č€…äøēŸ„ć€‚ He who knows (the Dao) does not (care to) speak (about it); he who is (ever ready to) speak about it does not know it.

  • gerikson@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    Ā·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    LessWrong’s descent into right-wing tradwife territory continues

    https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/tdQuoXsbW6LnxYqHx/annapurna-s-shortform?commentId=ueRbTvnB2DJ5fJcdH

    Annapurna (member for 5 years, 946 karma):

    Why is there so little discussion about the loss of status of stay at home parenting?

    First comment is from user Shankar Sivarajan, member for 6 years, 1227 karma

    https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/tdQuoXsbW6LnxYqHx/annapurna-s-shortform?commentId=opzGgbqGxHrr8gvxT

    Well, you could make it so the only plausible path to career advancement for women beyond, say, receptionist, is the provision of sexual favors. I expect that will lower the status of women in high-level positions sufficiently to elevate stay-at-home motherhood.

    […]

    EDIT: From the downvotes, I gather people want magical thinking instead of actual implementable solutions.

    Granted, this got a strong disagree from the others and a tut-tut from Habryka, but it’s still there as of now and not yeeted into the sun. And rats wonder why people don’t want to date them.

    • blakestacey@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      Ā·
      19 hours ago

      Dorkus malorkus alert:

      When my grandmother quit being a nurse to become a stay at home mother, it was seen like a great thing. She gained status over her sisters, who stayed single and in their careers.

      Fitting into your societal pigeonhole is not the same as gaining status, ya doofus.

    • blakestacey@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      19 hours ago

      Another comment that has been getting downvotes and tut-tuts begins,

      The only thing that will raise fertility rates is to make it more affordable to have a child.

      (Robot Santa voice) Wanting all women to be barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen? Evil! Not providing footnotes in your reply to a blog post? EXACTLY AS EVIL

      • gerikson@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        Ā·
        19 hours ago

        LOL the mod gets snippy here too

        This comment too is not fit for this site. What is going on with y’all? Why is fertility such a weirdly mindkilling issue?

        ā€œWhy are there so many Nazis in my Nazi bar???ā€

  • Architeuthis@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    Ā·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It’s possible we may be catching sight of the first shy movements towards a pivot to robotics:

    https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/autonomous-machines/embedded-systems/jetson-orin/nano-super-developer-kit/

    https://techcrunch.com/2025/07/09/hugging-face-opens-up-orders-for-its-reachy-mini-desktop-robots/

    Both developer kits, because it’s always a maybe the clients will figure something out type of business model these days.

    • istewart@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      Ā·
      19 hours ago

      But how are they going to awkwardly cram robots in everywhere, to follow up the overwhelming success of AI? Self-crashing cars are a gimme, but maybe a ā€œsealed for your protectionā€ Amazon locker with a robot arm that handles the package for you?

      I was in LA this time a couple years ago, and some robot delivery startup had already left their little motorized shopping carts littering the sidewalks around Hollywood. I never saw them moving, they just sat there almost like they were abandoned.

      • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        Ā·
        9 hours ago

        But how are they going to awkwardly cram robots in everywhere, to follow up the overwhelming success of AI?

        Good question - AFAICT, they’re gonna struggle to find places to cram their bubble-bots into. Plus, nothing’s gonna stop Joe Public from wrecking them in the streets - and given we’ve already seen Waymos getting torched and Lime scooters getting wrecked these AI-linked 'bots are likely next on the chopping block.

  • bitofhope@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    Ā·
    2 days ago

    Today’s bullshit that annoys me: Wikiwand. From what I can tell their grift is that it’s just a shitty UI wrapper for Wikipedia that sells your data to who the fuck knows to make money for some Israeli shop. Also they SEO the fuck out of their stupid site so that every time I search for something that has a Finnish wikipedia page, the search results also contain a pointless shittier duplicate result from wikiwand dot com. Has anyone done a deeper investigation into what their deal is or at least some kind of rant I could indulge in for catharsis?

    • istewart@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      Ā·
      2 days ago

      I’ve seen conspiracy theories that a lot of the ad buys for stuff like this are a new avenue of money laundering, focusing on stuff like pirate sports streaming sites, sketchy torrent sites, etc. But a full scraped, SEOd Wikipedia clone also fits.

  • Seminar2250@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    Ā·
    2 days ago

    trying to explain why a philosophy background is especially useful for computer scientists now, so i googled ā€œphysiognomy aiā€ and now i hate myself

    https://www.physiognomy.ai/

    Discover Yourself with Physiognomy.ai

    Explore personal insights and self-awareness through the art of face reading, powered by cutting-edge AI technology.

    At Physiognomy.ai, we bring together the ancient wisdom of face reading with the power of artificial intelligence to offer personalized insights into your character, strengths, and areas for growth. Our mission is to help you explore the deeper aspects of yourself through a modern lens, combining tradition with cutting-edge technology.

    Whether you’re seeking personal reflection, self-awareness, or simply curious about the art of physiognomy, our AI-driven analysis provides a unique, objective perspective that helps you better understand your personality and life journey.

    • mountainriver@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      Ā·
      2 days ago

      Prices ranging from 18 to 168 USD (why not 19 to 199? Number magic?) But then you get integrated approach of both Western and Chinese physiognomy. Two for one!

      Thanks, I hate it!

      • Seminar2250@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        Ā·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Number magic?

        they use numerology.ai as a backend

        ā€œwe encode shit as numbers in an arbitrary way and then copy-paste it into chatgptā€

    • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      2 days ago

      trying to explain why a philosophy background is especially useful for computer scientists now, so i googled ā€œphysiognomy aiā€ and now i hate myself

      Well, I guess there’s your answer - ā€œphilosophy teaches you how to avoid falling for huckstersā€

  • blakestacey@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    Ā·
    3 days ago

    In the morning: we are thrilled to announce this new opportunity for AI in the classroom

    In the afternoon:

    Someone finally flipped a switch. As of a few minutes ago, Grok is now posting far less often on Hitler, and condemning the Nazis when it does, while claiming that the screenshots people show it of what it’s been saying all afternoon are fakes.

    • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      3 days ago

      Someone finally flipped a switch. As of a few minutes ago, Grok is now posting far less often on Hitler, and condemning the Nazis when it does, while claiming that the screenshots people show it of what it’s been saying all afternoon are fakes.

      LLMs are automatic gaslighting machines, so this makes sense

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      3 days ago

      *musk voice* if machine god didn’t want me to fuck with the racism dial, he wouldn’t make it

  • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    Ā·
    2 days ago

    A company that makes learning material to help people learn to code made a test of programming basics for devs to find out if their basic skills have atrophied after use of AI. They posted it on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44507369

    Not a lot of engagement yet, but so far there is one comment about the actual test content, one shitposty joke, and six comments whining about how the concept of the test itself is totally invalid how dare you.

    • FredFig@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      Ā·
      2 days ago

      Looks like it’s been downranked into hell for being too mean to the AI guys, which is weird when its literally an AI guy promoting his AI generated trash.

    • V0ldek@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      Ā·
      2 days ago

      It seems that the test itself is generated by autoplag? At least that’s how I understand the PS and one of the comments about ā€œvibe regressionā€ in response to an error

      • V0ldek@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        Ā·
        2 days ago

        Anyway, they say it covers Node and to any question regarding Node the answer is ā€œnoā€, I don’t need an AI to know webdev fundamentals

      • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        Ā·
        2 days ago

        Its also completely accurate - AI bros are not only utterly lacking in any sort of skill, but actively refuse to develop their skills in favour of using the planet-killing plagiarism-fueled gaslighting engine that is AI and actively look down on anyone who is more skilled than them, or willing to develop their skills.

  • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    Ā·
    3 days ago

    Another day, another jailbreak method - a new method called InfoFlood has just been revealed, which involves taking a regular prompt and making it thesaurus-exhaustingly verbose.

    In simpler terms, it jailbreaks LLMs by speaking in Business Bro.

    • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      Ā·
      3 days ago

      I mean, decontextualizing and obscuring the meanings of statements in order to permit conduct that would in ordinary circumstances breach basic ethical principles is arguably the primary purpose of deploying the specific forms and features that comprise ā€œBusiness Englishā€ - if anything, the fact that LLM models are similarly prone to ignore their ā€œconscienceā€ and follow orders when deciding and understanding them requires enough mental resources to exhaust them is an argument in favor of the anthropomorphic view.

      Or:

      Shit, isn’t the whole point of Business Bro language to make evil shit sound less evil?

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      Ā·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      maybe there’s just enough text written in that psychopatic techbro style with similar disregard for normal ethics that llms latched onto that. this is like what i guess happened with that ā€œexplain step by stepā€ trick - instead of grafting from pairs of answers and questions like on quora, lying box grafts from sets of question -> steps -> answer like on chegg or stack or somewhere else where you can expect answers will be more correct

      it’d be more of case of getting awful output from awful input