• Redjard@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    30 days ago

    I see the stylisric reason to only apply the effect around the object, but it isn’t realistic.
    That radiation isn’t affected by optics, it’ll go right through the lenses that flip and focus the image and the aperture that might be engaged, and will hit the entire sensor equally. The entire image should be that noisy.

      • Redjard@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        30 days ago

        The beta emission of ⁶⁰Co can probably get through over 6mm of glass. This should be plenty for phones.

        But also

        ⁶⁰Co undergoes beta decay to an excited state of the stable isotope nickel-60 (⁶⁰Ni), which then emits two gamma rays […]

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          Even if it got blocked, there’s a fair bit of metal in a phone which will produce Bremsstrahlung under beta radiation. Obviously that’s only going to hit your face, not the sensor.

    • trolololol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      29 days ago

      Oh cool

      So if you had a camera with mirror would it still go a bit through the enclosure and hit the sensor?

      What if the sensor is flipped so it has to go through the silicon substrate before hitting the sensitive bits, would it be equally noisy but less noisy overall?

      • Redjard@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        Yes. Silicon substrate is too thin to matter. Redirecting with mirrors is probably gonna make it worse. Your housing would need over a cm of solid plastic to block beta radiation. On a dedicated camera you might have a sizeable lens with many lenses totalling a cm of shielding, but redirect the light and place the sensor not behind the lens and you only have that camera housing.

        Realistically though you have a smartphone, and that β-radiation will probably make it most of the way through the entire thing.

        And the gamma radiation really won’t care, even if you have a 50cm long zoom lens right between the sensor and source.
        This is where you might want a lead brick wall, 10cm thick should make it short-term safe for ⁶⁰Co.

        Edit: forgot this was in general, not about the β

        • BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          29 days ago

          I was going to include a tangent on how difficult it is to shield a spacecraft from cosmic radiation, but I’ll wait for a more appropriate post. Thanks for the refresher.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      With or without the camera degradation? I’ll bet that cost extra.

        • Gladaed@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          30 days ago

          Shouldn’t be allowed to exist. This removes the terror and fear of seeing an actual Co-60 rod and may kill someone.

          Never abuse warning labels for comedic effect. This is deadly.

          • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            30 days ago

            Yeah, wasn’t a source lost on the side of the road in Australia a year or two ago where anyone could have picked it up if they didn’t know better

            • Gladaed@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              30 days ago

              Yes, 3 years ago.

              These things are no joke. Proper labeling is no joke. They found it at some point. Just went where they had been and used a Geiger counter.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            30 days ago

            Yep. The only reason it should exist is for a demonstration piece, to say if you see it to drop it and run, and inform the proper authorities.

            • trolololol@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              29 days ago

              In this case it should also have engraved something like " not actually cobalt just a security training mock"

          • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            28 days ago

            Never abuse warning labels for comedic effect. This is deadly.

            A few years ago, there was a news story about a guy driving with radiation warning labels on his car for fun. He got fined HARD because he wasn’t certified for that or had the permits .

            Doesn’t matter if you don’t have actual radioactive material. That shit is illegal for a good reason.

  • glizzyguzzler@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 month ago

    I highly recommend holding it within 3 feet of your body for 5 to 10 minutes; absolutely nothing can go wrong from holding a Cobalt-60 source with 3540 Curies in 1963 within 3 feet of your body for 5 to 10 minutes!

  • CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    Y’all looking at the radio-active isotope, while I can’t see past the mutated hotdog fingers

  • Brem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 month ago

    Replaced phone after the screen started bubbling for some reason.

    Hand fell off.

    Using other hand on a new phone, but I’m having trouble seeing anything at all now

    thnx