• SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    3 days ago

    The initial investigation indicates that the pickup driver was following the bus too closely

    Did they not see the video? Bus was almost at a full stop and it still took the truck 5 seconds to hit it at Mach Fuck. Not even a nervous driving instructor would call a >5 second follow distance “too close.”

    • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised if the driver is a cop or at least knows the investigators. Sounds like a very fishy conclusion, the video makes it obvious he definitely had time enough to react.

      • relativelyrobin@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s the traffic offense. It’s the ticket you get when you rear-end someone. They aren’t trying to throw the book at the driver. It’s a routine citation.

        Whoever wrote it just called a traffic ticket an “investigation” to make it sound dramatic.

      • kungen@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yep, that’s exactly what I thought. Even if you say that you were “brake-checked” for example, the cops in NYS will still give you a ticket and tell you to take it with the courts.

        § 1129. Following too closely. (a) The driver of a motor vehicle shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicles and the traffic upon and the condition of the highway.

        Not to mention that NYS has stricter laws than most other states regarding stopped school busses; if they’re stopped, you can’t drive past them even if you’re in opposing traffic.

        This story stinks, but glad that no kids got seriously hurt.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      I suppose it wastechnically the truth… Embedded in the back of the bus is certainly following too closely…

    • relativelyrobin@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s the traffic offense. It’s the ticket you get when you rear-end someone. They aren’t trying to throw the book at the driver. It’s a routine citation.

      Whoever wrote it just called a traffic ticket an “investigation” to make it sound dramatic.

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    4 days ago

    The initial investigation indicates that the pickup driver was following the bus too closely, Jiron said.

    Just for curiousity…did the police think to check the fucking doorbell camera?

    “Too closely”? My man he’s a good 50-100m away from that bus at the start of the clip, and the bus didn’t just jack on its brakes, that was a slow and diliberate stop.

    Following to closely. Lol.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      The definition of “following too closely” is relatively circular. You have proper following distance if you stop in time to avoid a collision. If you don’t avoid a collision, you obviously didn’t have enough following distance.
      “The cars wouldn’t have run into each other if they had been further apart” is basically them saying "driver wasn’t dunk or impaired, no sign of mechanical failure, and no evidence they were distracted.
      Driving into the back of a school bus is evidence that you at the very least should have been further back, assuming you did everything else by the book.

      • Pyr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yes, technically he was following too closely to account for the fact he was looking at his phone.

        If you are looking at your phone you should probably be leaving much more space between you and the vehicle in front due to the fact that your reaction time will be significantly delayed. So technically too close. If he wasn’t on the phone it would have been proper following distance.

      • PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        In most drivers ed programs, they teach 4 second following distance. You pick a landmark, start counting when the car in front of you passes it, and you should count to at least 4 by the time your vehicle passes the same spot.

        Unfortunately I don’t think it’s actually a law in many places.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yup, they taught me that rule of thumb too. It’s not a specific law because the law says you must dive safely with appropriate following distance for road conditions, which can be longer than 4 seconds in bad weather.

          Like my state has:

          (1) The operator of a motor vehicle shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of the vehicles and the traffic upon and the condition of the highway.

          It’s both good and bad that there’s no objective measure, depending on if you’re the one getting a ticket for driving like an ass.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s not a full sized truck. That’s some wankers oversized support vehicle

  • Leviathan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    3 days ago

    The height of pickup trucks should be capped by law. No crash compatibility with normal vehicles, automatically hits pedestrians in their vital organs, can’t see anyone sitting or fallen in front of it. What an absolutely idiotic society to let this kind of thing be driven on public roads without a special licence.

  • Zombie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    247
    ·
    4 days ago

    The initial investigation indicates that the pickup driver was following the bus too closely,

    Nothing to do with too close, there’s plenty of distance. They just didn’t stop.

          • The Ramen Dutchman@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            I mean, you can drive a ridiculously oversized fragile ego compensation vehicle and also keep under the speed limit, watch out and brake on time

            • freebee@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              If you crash (and people tend to do that quite often in cars), the damage is bigger with a bigger vehicle. If you don’t need it to move big things ,a smaller vehicle is better for everyone.

          • egrets@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            31
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Speed limits can be useful to reduce accidents (though I do think they’re also often used to line the state’s pockets, especially on highways) but the fundamental responsibility is on the driver to drive at an appropriate speed for the context and conditions.

            If you can’t stop in time to avoid an accident such as a bus gently stopping, the speed limit is totally irrelevant – it’s on the driver to be alert and in control.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      There’s was an Olympics swimming pool worth of distance between them. The driver was clearly playing with their phone, not looking out the windscreen.

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Huh, I’ve never heard “Olympics swimming pool” used to measure something that isn’t liquid. Isn’t the proper freedom unit of length measured in “football fields”?

        • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          As an American who is bad at sportzball and has no interest in it, it only recently dawned on me that the reason so many people use yards to estimate distances is because of football, and possibly shooting ranges, which I also have no interest in.

        • bss03@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          How about a compromise? You use the metric system, km in specific; BUT, you get to call them “clicks” so you sound like you are in the military?

          (j/k I’m also American and I only use km for running distances, not driving distances.)

    • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      Why does every “initial investigation” made into literally anything always come to the most shockingly, obviously wrong conclusion. Did they not have this video?

      • Leviathan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        In a terminally car-centric society, the idea that drivers are inherently stupid and unsafe and that most people should be using public transport so they can look at their phones as much as they obviously want to is blasphemy. So they always come up with the story that leaves the driver with the least amount of fault and no real repercussions; was he using his phone and totally distracted? No! He was following too closely and the bus slammed on its brakes! Totally unavoidable accident where no one needs to be slapped on the wrist or have their licence taken away.

    • Hux@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 days ago

      When your intake valves are clogged with lunchables and protractors, yeah…you’re too close.

  • N-E-N@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    4 days ago

    Guys the bus just jumped outta no where, he had no time to react. Plus it wasn’t dressed in bright enough colors to be visible

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 days ago

    Holy crap, that truck driver only looked up in the last quarter-second. They most certainly were not “following too closely”, that’s bullshit.

    The driver of the 2007 Dodge Ram pickup was taken to Wynn Hospital in Utica for treatment of minor injuries…

    In the past, that accident would have been fatal to the driver. The only thing that saved him was government regulation requiring safety features, paid for by taxes–just to put a nice, fine point on it. Not everything our governments do is horrible, but I suspect the motivation in this case was insurance company lobbying, not empathy. It’s never empathy.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’d like to know what was on the driver’s phone that was so much more interesting than a stationary bus a hundred yards in front of them.

    • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      He was calling about his missed payment because he bought 5 times more truck than he can afford. “But I need a $70,000 truck.”

  • catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    Now imagine that it was a sedan doing a carpool. Fuck everyone who drives a truck to commute around town. Fuck everyone who thinks, I’ll buy a truck because I’ll be safer. I hope gasoline goes up to $15 per gallon and every truck driving piece of shit has to choose between eating or driving because of their moronic vehicle buying decision.

    • Mpatch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      Just for that ignorance, on my next finance, I’m going to trade in my toyota and get a 2500 ram with a cummins. Cause fuck you.

        • Mpatch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Look here bud, that’s not much of an insult. Seeing as how anyone can be a potential child murderer. Just as easily anyone can be a potential billionare, just as anyone could be a potential athlete or potential homeless person. Every one has potential to be what ever the fuck they want.

          • Riverside@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            anyone can be a potential child murderer

            You just decide to multiply your chances by 10 while spending double in your vehicle and in fuel for literally no reason

          • catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Wtf are you talking about? Lol. Buying a child killing machine is a conscious choice that also costs that person double or more on the purchase price, gasoline, tires, oil and other maintenance. You have to overlook all of that and still say, I don’t care that there’s no way I would see a child right in front of my truck. I’m still going to make a terrible financial decision because I’ll be more protected and more likely to kill someone else. I got mine!

            Look here bud, that’s not much of an insult.

            Jesus fucking Christ man. Take a look at yourself. You don’t think being called a child murderer is much of an insult. Fucking wow

            • Mpatch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Nah, all you priks and your shit attitudes regarding pickup trucks is pissing me off. So instead of huffin and puffin, I’ll just get me a new truck. Because I can. Yall act like every pick up driver is 100% guaranteed to kill your kids/dogs/grandma’s the moment they leave the lot. Yall act like pick ups are these thirsty fuel guzzlers. Funny my loaded 2011 3500 cummins gets better fuel economy than my 2023 highlander with a 4cylinder. And I don’t even have to pay premium in the cummins. What else. O my truck insurance is $250 dollars less than toyota. And guess what quotes for new trucks are 150$ less… tires? Tire cost less because I can put on a set of LT rated tires they will last longer and can get better deals on them. My trucks have needed so little maintenance over the years that when I took the new car i was Hella unprepared for that headache.

            • Mpatch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Do you actually own a veichle? Or do you just pretend to know what you are talking about?

        • jve@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          Lol you didn’t even ask a question.

          You told a bunch of people to fuck themselves.

          pretty telling

          Lmao

          • catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            Well you’re responding to a thread that did have a question in it and then pointing at the original comment instead of the one with a question.

            That being said, you’re still correct. If you drive a truck without a specific use that you use it for almost every day then go fuck yourself.

            Is that clear now?

            • Mpatch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              It will have a specific use every day. To drive my children around so they are safe.

            • jve@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              Well you’re responding to a thread that did have a question in it

              No I’m not. There is no question in this thread.

              Not unless you’ve edited one of your comments to add one after I made this comment.

              Is that clear now?

              Ok fine, now there’s one rhetorical question.

              Nothing was ever unclear.

              Trucks r bad grrr. I get ya brother.

              Best to tell people to fuck themselves and see if they react calmly and rationally. If they don’t, be sure to act like it’s pretty telling.

              • catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Was referring to the question further down. Thought you were responding to that one not the main comment. My bad!

                Yes, the people who are so rational and calm that they purchase vehicles specifically designed to kill toddlers and hurt other people when traffic accidents occur. Making a conscious decision to spend double or more on purchase price, gasoline, tires, oil and other maintenance just so they can say, fuck you I got mine. Rational and calm people who, when given the chance of a car crash only causing injuries to both parties, they’d prefer to kill the other people as long as they don’t get hurt. How dare I be mean to them!

                Next time you see someone going out of their way to hurt others make sure to ask them kindly to stop. You wouldn’t want to be too assertive and make them upset. I can’t imagine anything worse. Well, maybe running over a toddler with a vehicle that was intentionally made to have less visibility than an Abrams tank. But that’s just me. At least certain people don’t need to worry about driving safely because they’re more protected than everyone else. Pretty good trade off, right?

                • jve@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Anybody that writes whole paragraphs ranting against straw men should go fuck themselves.

    • Soulg@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      3 days ago

      If it was a sedan doing a car pool they’d probably all have been decapitated… So him having a truck saved his life

      Dunno what your argument is but it’s kinda insane

      • Dima@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        they’d probably all have been decapitated

        If that’s a risk, do you not have underrun bars?

        But also as someone else said they meant if it was a regular car instead of the bus, not the truck.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        If you drive up the arse of a goddamn school bus with that much stopping distance you deserve to hurt only yourself, not the kids in the back of that bus.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    4 days ago

    That dad coming out, seeing that, then giving his son a hug was probably the most relieved he’s ever been in his life.