• circuitfarmer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Friendly reminder that this is yet another reason people need to keep paying in cash. Eventually these groups will run out of online scapegoats and there will be a more generalized push to control what you can and can’t buy, on or offline.

    Sure, it’s convenient to pop that card down or use Apple pay, etc: but this is why we as a society should not be beholden to a handful of third-party payment processors.

    Pay in cash whenever possible. Even if you don’t believe there will be bigger (offline) issues later, taking money away from the snakes is not a bad thing, and it’s easy to do. They make money on every transaction. The convenience of not dealing with change is not free.

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Agreed. I am a cash man these days. Fuck having all my purchases being watched by big brother. Anything I can pay for with cash, I do. Plus, there is no screen rotated your way awkwardly asking for a tip before you have even been served.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Why aren’t payment processors required to be neutral like internet providers and telecoms? You just process a payment between two consenting parties for legal goods and services. Why should you get to restrict the types of goods and services that pass through you?

    • 0tan0d@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They own enough politicians to keep any possible change under committee review indefinitely. IF we did pass a law they also own enough judges that it would die in a shadow docket. I love oligarchy, basically anything broken is broken because some rich ass hole is paying for it to be kept that way.

    • BehavioralClam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Probably vastages from times where they just started and had to fight regular banking cartels trying to link them to crime, as they themselves do with crypto.

      • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        I doubt it. This weird prudishness seems to be new. I can see them being dodgy about processing payments for weed stores as it’s still illegal federally. But they’re not acting like this has anything to do with the law. Restricting games sales in Steam that includes adult material, and kickstarter contributions for Adult projects had nothing to do with crime. And it’s no coincidence that it’s happening at the same time that states and some countries are requiring invasive data collection for age verification for visiting adult websites. There is a concerted political right wing effort to push prudish restrictions on everyone by any means possible.

    • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Agree 100%. Payment providers should be classified as common carriers, prohibited from discriminating against any legal business or product.

  • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Why the actual fuck are these credit companies allowed so much unbridled power within our society? They can unilaterally exile whole sections of society. Why?

  • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Where is the source of liability that is making payment processors so adverse to adult content? You’re never going to convince me it’s a morality thing, they only care about the money. So where is the added risk/cost in processing adult content?

  • Dagnet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    Every time I use my country’s own payment processor (Pix), I do so with a smile knowing that VISA/Mastercard wont get a dime

    • Ironfist79@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I keep asking why the US doesn’t have a federally controlled payment processor. Well, I know why, but one can dream I guess.

      • ryper@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        If the US had a federally controlled payment processor they’d just end up with Republicans trying to limit what it could be used for. No porn, no abortions, etc.

  • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Damn, I just backed a project that doesn’t have adult content right now, but conceivably could in the future just because it’s a slice of life comic about adults (also sci fi but that’s irrelevant to the overall point). I wonder how this is going to affect funded but not yet disbursed projects.

    Especially since the restrictions are so severe… you can’t do a ton of legitimate art if you can’t show nip or butt.