Yes, I’m aware I can curse on the internet - it’s not my first day here. I use the exact words I mean to use, and I’m more a fan of the precision F-strike than indiscriminately carpet-bombing the place with “fucks”. Stop word-policing me (and others).

Edited to add alt text.

Yeah, this went over about as well as expected. And the irony and hypocrisy of the free speech absolutists coming out of the woodwork to tell us all what we can and can’t say is not lost on me.

  • KarlHungus42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    People can obviously say whatever they want, but my opinion is that substituting curse words makes people sound juvenile and the intent is still the same as the original word. You are still making people do a curse conversion in their heads. So why even bother? Kind of like people who won’t say goddamnit, but they’ll say gawldamnit or something like that. Do you think you’re fucking tricking god? There are plenty of other words that can be used for emphasis.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      OK but holy forking shirtballs was contextually hilarious and I will always respect a good place reference.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      And the reason for that is that unalive only exists because of shit sites like YouTube that won’t allow basic language because oh my god won’t anyone think of the children!?

      • P1k1e@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Exactly, but it erks me that it has moved into irl interaction. Perhaps I’m just an old man, (I am) and I get that even speaking in public sometimes requires self censorship on the simple grounds that it’s polite, but using corporate approved verbage on every day conversation fills.me with rage and regret

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I don’t care if someone wants to say fork, that’s fine, and there aren’t many people that have a problem with that, and if they do, they can’t force you to say things differently anyway. At worst you get a post complaining

    The real problem is the other way around; that major internet sites are word policing the crap out of everyone else to the point where you cannot even say words like “death”. You have to say dumb shit like “unalive” and they do put real consequences to disobedience like being demonitized

  • Galactose@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Using the word Fork instead of Fuck IS a result if policing. We just want to undo that

  • bunnyBoy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’ve posted about this before and met the same results. People are very convinced that the danger of the internet becoming more ad friendly is more important that letting people say what they wanna say. In a way I do get it, but it’s annoying not being able to do what you wanna do.

  • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I don’t care if people censor their swears, my problem is the word substitutions making whatever they’re saying nigh unreadable like “Unalive”, “grape”, “PDF file”.

  • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    19 hours ago

    No, fuck that.

    Either stop self-censoring or don’t structure your comments and sentences to use the word. This half-assed censoring is the lazy coward’s way out

  • Cris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 hours ago

    To me fork makes way more sense, I feel like it conveys a totally different tone, and therefor has a different function in communicating

    I guess a sensored f—k does too, but not anywhere near as distinct.

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I feel like it conveys a totally different tone, and therefor has a different function in communicating

      You’re forking right it does.

    • TWeaK@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Censored f–k or f*ck or whatever doesn’t really convey a different tone, other than trying to say something without saying it. Which is annoying and frustrating, it puts work onto the listener that should have been done by the communicator.

      Fork does come out with a different tone, because it doesn’t sound as harsh. It’s like how saying shit is a bit less severe than saying fuck - fork would be less than both of these, maybe on par with crap.

  • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Ay yes lets let corporations rule all of us wven further by proxy. How dare we swear on a medium that could be reuploaded to their platform

  • JandroDelSol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I dunno, I think it’s a little childish to censor swear words instead of finding a replacement or just saying the swear, but it’s not that big a deal.

    what’s worse is people saying r*pe or rap3 instead of rape, or “sui” or “unalive” instead of suicide. people shouldn’t have to figure out how every Homestuck character would say a word if they wanna block content including these things.