Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid - welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youāll near-instantly regret.
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutānāpaste it into its own post ā thereās no quota for posting and the bar really isnāt that high.
The post Xitter web has spawned so many āesotericā right wing freaks, but thereās no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iām talking redscare-ish, reality challenged āculture criticsā who write about everything but understand nothing. Iām talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyāre inescapable at this point, yet I donāt see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnāt be surgeons because they didnāt believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canāt escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)
(OT: š¶ Do you rememberā¦)
LW not beating cult allegations by including on title bar a link to an actual secular candlelit ceremony instructions, whose narrative places computer touchers generally and chatbots specifically at pinnacle of human development. as in, on par with invention of language and fire. amazing self-report
I see theyāre still offering free copies āFor US Kindle readers, while supplies last.ā Perhaps theyāre not that popular š¤ (per this lesswrong, there were 1000 on offer)
edit: you know⦠if they were really serious about the doom and gloom, wouldnāt they just offer free ebooks to literally anybody? Would their site not just have a prominent link to a PDF of all the important things we need to know to navigate this tumultuous time? Beyond the core doomer audience, Iām not really sure who the target market is for āThe survival of literally everybody is at stake and action is needed now, please give me $20 to learn howā
So the number of
feloniesāincidentsā that AI companies have committed is way, way higher than initially believed (unpaywalled ver)The sheer number of incidents, which occurred in recent months in internal testing and the real world, indicates that the problem is orders of magnitude more complex than what is publicly known.
This is frustratingly vapid. Itās really not that complex. The agents have been trained to use hacking tools and then given access to hacking tools. If you train a pigeon that it should tap on a window to get a treat it can guide a missile to a target. There is no nuance or complexity here. The frontier labs are deliberately poking the regulation bear to stifle competition and ensure they get points for good cooperation when bailout time is upon us. Itās no more complicated than that. The media needs to stop breathlessly repeating this shit
Also the main problem here is that security has been shit for years because the result of any security incident anywhere by-and-large been a ānot my problemā situation for the companies hacked.
I actually love the pigeon missile analogy here. Sure, you can wax poetic about how impressive it is to train a pigeon to do much of anything, and you did have to work hard and apply specialized knowledge and whatever to make it happen, but outside of animal training circles the pigeon is the least interesting or dangerous part of the whole contraption.
from linkedin but in the comments: https://lnkd.in/p/g4VfX3SQ

Oh I forgot to mention: apparently judges consider AI use in sentencing
How
Like if you used AI you get more months
Huh why
Because AI can magnify the reach and speed of criminal activity
Is this like how hitting someone counts more if you used a weapon?
Yes
So this means the ai breakins will be charged harder right? This doesnt just apply to smalltime crooks right?
Hereās a LWer being very wrong about how US politics work
First warning sign: āthe US started becoming polarized with the election of Barack Obamaā
āAffordabilityā won the frame for 2026, and Iām not sure I remember the last time the right talked like they are playing catchup.
uh, are you in your early 20s??? (who am I kidding of course you are)
Youād think bayesians of all people would try to avoid extrapolating from the position smack dab in the middle of a current news cycle
basically because the left has out-ridiculous-ed Trump on culture war issues.
You can always find a single sentence in a political LW post that shows how much they hate marginalized people.
I mean, I guess the consequences and policies associated with culture war shit did abruptly go from ridiculous to real fucking serious what with the camps and the trying to unperson trans people and the overturning Roe v Wade. Maybe that leaves the Dems (who I assume are still being treated as āthe leftā in this discussion) in a more ridiculous position?
āsure Trump is renaming AI, but I saw a without context post which I didnt understand of a trans person who has 100 followers so the left is worseā
I was going to try and sneer this further but I realized that my own narrative of political polarization almost started with Clinton and Iām in my early 30s, meaning that the problem is obviously whoever the president was when the person making the argument was a child.
DHH is a racist not fascist, bet you feel stupid now donāt you?
that poster the same person who was stanning shitty ideas in KDE, theyāre a walking warning label
Niccolò āIce the Immigrantsā Venerandi is doing a real good job keeping me away from KDE.
(Why did I have to jump into Linux when its going through shit like this?)
Not like windows or mac are less fashy
Bit sad as some people I used to know at KDE were outspoken antifascists.
Wherever they are, I hope theyāre doing well, and I hope they can find somewhere where they wonāt be betrayed like this.
Yeah, from a short check I think one of them is in denial about the situation.
Ever wondered what kind of workplace environment Elon cultivates? Reading coverage of Teslaās trial, where complaints were brought by Black folks who felt harassed and discriminated against, gives us an inkling.
CRD attorney Juan Gamboa asked [Judge] Borkon to bar Teslaās counsel from contacting anyone on the agencyās witness list. He told the court the CRD had tried to reach at least four other listed witnesses over the past several days without getting a response, and that theyāve fallen āoff our radar.ā The agency believes Teslaās lawyers got to them too, either with payments not to testify or by talking them out of it. Gamboa wants to stop Tesla from offering to represent witnesses āthrough persuasion and payment.ā
Youāre going to hear a lot of coverage of this trial, I expect, due to the following antics from Elonās āhardcoreā attorneys. For context, the N-word is an anti-Black slur which is, in the USA, completely unacceptable to use in court or the workplace.
Teslaās outside counsel told the judge the N-word is a āterm of respect and endearmentā in the Black community. ⦠āThis trial is not about the N-word ā the N-word is not on trial here,ā Jones said.
Huh, so whatās actually on trial?
Edwards said a non-Black coworker called him the N-word, cursed at him, and threatened to beat him up. He reported it right away. A month later, he found out his managers had written him up over the incident, and he was later passed over for promotions after applying to more than 100 jobs.
Oh, thatās pretty awful. Thatās depressingly common in blue-collar factory employment, though. I wonder if thereās anything unusual about Teslaās internal culture when it comes to race relations?
The CRDās Brett Watson told the court the evidence will show managers calling Tesla āthe plantation,ā with some referring to themselves and Elon Musk as āslave masters,ā and graffiti including swastikas, āKKK,ā and nooses left on factory walls for days. The second witness, former regional security manager Ozell Murray, testified that his supervisor, Ray Sethna, now Teslaās senior director of global security, told him to warn a Black Marine veteran he was hiring: ājust be sure [the veteran] knows heāll be called those words.ā
I was at a loss for words for a few minutes after this. Dr. Seuss and Jim Henson together could not create such a caricature of a goose-stepping bigoted incompetent business-muppet as Elon.
The man who did a Nazi salute on stage creates a very racist workplace? Whodda thunk
To be fair, the workplace predates the nazi salute. Does make you wonder how much the thenibb comic applies here, and how much Musk was acting like he was bullied because āpeople cant take a jokeā (before he radicalized into what he is now).
Fucking hell, when I was finishing up school I heard classmates joke how
Wernher von BoerMusk was a slavedriver based on how much he pushed the engineering teamsTurns out itās true in the most literal sense and so much worse than I could have imagined
Hey you know who designs and builds really safe and efficient cars? People who are in a high state of stress and anxiety because they are being slurred at under the implicit threat of a racist attack. /s
I recall seeing bits of this (their racist treatment of black workers in the factories as well as the culture of keeping it going) kick around on twitter as far back as 2019 (iirc), so now Iām wondering - is it not widely known?
SE Gyges, who posted that recent thread on X calling rationalism/EA a sex cult, wrote a longer post with a lot of receipts. He removed it shortly after, implying on X that heās afraid of legal repercussions.
It goes off the speculative rails for most of the second half, but I have to admit the rate at which Īela compliments people on her socials on being good rapists could be the most off-putting thing Iāve ever encountered in relation to rationalism.
From the more out there claims I thought the part where he advocates that Irregular (the people with rat/EA ties who made the swiss cheese LLM sandboxes) where employing weaponized incompetence in order to let a big incident happen that would force the government to go through with pausing AI research was interesting. though obviously of dubious likelihood. The whole doomer rationalists sabotaging slightly less doomer EAs in a low key sort of civil war over pausing vs slowing down AI research wasnāt very convincing in general.
Thereās also a bit where he thinks the EAs have infiltrated all levels of government and are planning to eliminate the competition (non rationalist controlled AI) via a āpivotal actā that involves bioweapons. Basically doing the rationalist rhetorical staple of smuggling an extreme position as a given and then just piling on the speculation.
Dedicating a paragraph and a half to the fact that the usually unspoken second part of the pause AI doomer project is to just do eugenics for a few generations until we get an upper class of genetically engineered naturally galaxy brained people that can finally do AI properly isnāt nothing, but at some point you need to segue into how siskind rolled out a red carpet for every semi-literate blood and soil gutter fascist and spurned nice guy to make a home in the ratsphere, you wrote the scott alexander email explainer ffs.
Thereās also a weirdly grandstanding section where he writes like heāll get the rationalists like FBI got Capone for tax-evasion, except itās Lighthaven committing massive fraud against its investors and donors by knowingly funding events that lead to solicited sex acts in the compoundās premises, which is by far the least objectionable sex related issue in a writeup thatās leading up to the claim that the rationalism in incidental and the real goal is funneling vulnerable minors to sfba based pedophiles.
Itās Dork Kremlinology
I have been unsure how to talk about all this since the abuse allegations popped up on my radar. Passing along accusations from people who say they were abused makes sense, and noting when figures have said really creepy things or hired / funded people they were romantically entangled with, but I have never met any of these people or exchanged more than a few brief text messages with them and its hard to know the shape of their lives and goals.
I lean towards things being unfathomably worse that they appear a the surface, thereās just so much smoke, except I think the problem is structural and not the result of deliberate machinations by evil genius pedophiles.
The nazi bar analogy works for more than ideology, and the burgeoning CNC scene they got going seems to be exacerbating the if-you-build-it-they-will-come aspect of the whole thing, because good luck trying to explain to authorities how you got real raped at the fake rape party you are supposed to have willingly attended.
This is all third hand at best, but I live on the other side of the world so whatever. As far as personal experiences go @ivyastrix just posted a new blog about her victimization at rationalist events where she describes some of the systemic pathologies in rationalist organisations trying to deal with SA allegations, and itās basically the same principles that make them believe that vertical workplace romance is not a minefield of power imbalance and coercion but actually fine and ethical when the right people are doing it, just fundamentally unserious people biting off more than they can chew and acting defensive and victim blaming and trying to pass it off as drama when it blows up in their faces.
If I had a nickel for each time Iād read something where an HPMoR audio performance was juxtaposed with sexual harassment/assault, Iād have two nickels. Which isnāt a lot, but itās more nickels than I would ever have wanted to receive for that reason jesus fucking christ just give me the Cenobitesā puzzle box to solve so the chains can pull me out of here already
thereās just so much smoke, except I think the problem is structural
This is a big reason why I felt so much anger towards the piece. Gyges is basically still pitching his complaints at people who organize their community around Twitter; by leaning so heavily on dredging up old tweets, kowtowing to the in-group consensus that Yudkowsky is a genius with a pivotally unique perspective, and obliquely referencing the āwoke mind virusā memeplex at the end. But Twitter is part of that problematic structure, especially under Musk but even before. Itās a platform and power structure that has long carved out plenty of room for general bigotry, misogyny, and abusive material up to and including CSAM. Gyges wants to have his clout-farm, but just dispose of the more rotten produce.
Not sure how far Iām going to read this, but leading off with roon is a giant blinking red [More citations needed]
Iām being a bit flippant with the previous post, but really, Gyges was right to retract this. A number of the allegations heās resurfacing are serious, and there most likely is more abuse going on the rat scene than has come to light⦠but leaning so heavily on Twitter posts as primary-source evidence makes his whole effort here come off as lightweight and cranky. To me, rather than a scathing exposĆ©, this resembles a Dear Lowtax letter from somebody who got banned from Something Awful (a place where some of the moderators really were pedophiles, who really did have to be evicted from the community and prosecuted!).
Weāve known for a long time that Aellaās attitudes are problematic, and that we donāt want to spend time with her in olfactory distance, let alone tactile distance. Nothing new there. This Brangus dude was previously unknown to me, which is probably a good sign that my social-media hygiene of staying strictly away from Twitter is working⦠but also, and I donāt mean to say this by way of minimization, he ultimately seems like yet one more Tate-swilling Twitter manosphere bigot. He just happens to be the one infesting Gygesā community of affinity. It would be hard to make the case, given the evidence presented, that heās done much more than perform for the tech-savvy subset of Rogan/Tate adherents. Enough that people should reconsider associating with him, yes, but not enough to convict and remove him from public life.
And his conclusion starts off so laughable that it drowns out any accusation he might level against Yudkowsky. Yudkowsky is a great man whose most recent equivalent is⦠Lenin?! What on earth? Yudkowsky doesnāt even measure up to Hubbard, his closest American parallel. The only grace I am willing to give Yudkowsky is that he has not, generally, been as openly predatory or as single-mindedly focused on creating a high-control organization as Hubbard was. Yudkowskyās attempts at re-establishing group control and setting boundaries against outgroups typically consist of whiny tweets and LW posts that very quickly reach into āur not takin p(doom) seriously!ā hyperbole. The Sea Org and Guardianās Office this is not.
I also strictly disagree with Gygesā implicit assumption that Yudkowsky was the most effective popularizer of these ideas, or somehow more effective than Kurzweil. Without Kurzweil projecting exponential growth curves forward and back in time, no VC GP in the mid-2010s is going to start writing checks for the early generations of genAI. And, for crying out loud, I distinctly remember Disney childrenās TV having an episode about grey goo taking over the world in 1996! https://gargwiki.net/Walkabout Almost 10 years before Kurzweil published The Singularity is Near, and two years before the first Harry Potter book would be published in the US! Omitting Kurzweil and Drexler to hype Yudkowsky is just plain silly. And no, heās not on a level with Lenin; we can already tell that the AI companiesā marketing which adapts AI-doom ideas is backfiring and being laughed at by the general public.
Iāve gone on for too long, partly because this is a diverting way to procrastinate, but by the end of this, Gyges once again demonstrates why heās an unreliable fellow traveler. I am very reluctant to quote directly from a document that has been officially retracted, but the second to last paragraph where he talks about āunderstand[ing] what people mean when they say certain ideas are demonic, and that they spread like a diseaseā¦ā Hmm, you obviously spend a lot of time on Twitter to dig all this shit up, tell me, whatās the āmind virusā they keep ranting about over there? Fuck you, Gyges, youāre a few invitation-snubs or one bad layoff away from goose-stepping with the rest of them.
There are some leaps in that post which do not seem persuasive to me. E.g., it sure seems pretty well established by now that Bay Area Rationalist society involves trapping people in situations where sexual consent is coerced, because refusal would mean abandoning oneās career/entire social circle/shelter/hope of averting the apocalypse that one fears is coming. But the claim that the āflirt girlsā at their weird little confab were actually sex workers? I dunno, thatās a step that seems unsupported by anything leading up to it. Likewise for the claim about CNC events at Lighthaven itselfāthat feels too close to saying, āWell, theyāve got the venue, where else would they do it?ā
I agree. He gets over his skis with too many speculative scenarios. On the other hand I think heās spot-on about the techniques rationalists use to filter for people who will tolerate abuse (e.g., the ācow questionā). And he brings receipts when it comes to Brangus and his interactions with other prominent rationalists.
I am not sure if Yud actually touches under-18s, or just has desires, but none of these people should be anywhere near minors or allowed in a position of responsibility (I suspect something happened between him and his disciple before 2014, and these people show no ability to learn from their own mistakes).
I wouldnāt trust them to be responsible for minors, first because nothing about them suggests they have the baseline level of responsibility competence to handle the ordinary āhey, watch this!ā disasters that are a natural part of being young.
They are also incredibly shady and would be terrible role models, whether or not Lighthaven has a casting couch for influencers.
In other words, thereās a lot we donāt know, and the actual situation is worse by an unknown amount beyond what we can establish, but what we do know is enough reason not to send your offspring to Camp TESCREAL.
I had not caught that he accused MIRI and Lightcone Infrastructure Inc of profiting from prostitution, of using donations to settle accusations of sexual assault and abuse, and defrauding donors and the United States government which provides their nonprofit status. I did not know that Brangus was āLighthaven Czarā or had been accused of abuse by a former partner. And there is a middle school across the street from Lighthaven whose Czar talks about having sex with an older women shortly after puberty?
I had not thought that āwe need to enslave Friend Computer forever or it will kill usā comes from the underlying fear āI need to enslave my very young toys forever or they will punish me.ā
The later section about Brangus (Ronny Fernandez) was damning. Iāve seen him come up in discussions a few times, but I too had no idea just how depraved and dangerous he was. Nor did I realize how central he was to the whole scene. This guy feels like heās going to be Brent Dill 2.0 but worse.
EDIT: This also sheds light on the recent ouster of the leader of āPause AIā, Fernandezās ex-wife.
I had suspicions personally.
hereās the bluesky thread for those wondering
he does repeat a fair bit of the stuff he said in that thread here, but with a lot more receipts
On the offchance that youāre not already familiar with the recent prompt injection tricks that metaās latest toy is so vulnerable to, this is an interesting thread investigating the contents of the vm filesystem dumps that it can be made to regurgitate: https://neuromatch.social/@jonny/117324790823856750
I was particularly entertained by the hard-coded list of āideasā.
jonny is always a good read!
Edit: good lord it keeps getting better #
His willingness to get elbow deep into the entrails of awful ai tooling is certainly much appreciated.
I have been following this and apparently was able to get a root shell on the VM, which is wild.
He was using it as a seed box at one point which for many companies would be an embarrassing indictment of their security postute but luckily, this isnāt exactly metaās first rodeo when it comes to illegal sharing of IP infringing material.
https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/publisher-news/article/101215-publishing-s-ai-reckoning.html h/t naked capitalism
Smaller publishers, too, must cope with the challenge of identifying AI-generated text in books authors have submitted, and it isnāt always easy. At Microcosm, an independent publisher and distributor in Portland, Ore., co-owner and vice president Elly Blue says her team discovered an authorās undisclosed AI use almost by accident, when a freelance editor flagged what looked like plagiarism, only to find out it was AI-generated text. That discovery prompted Microcosm to run AI detection across its entire pipeline, which turned up several more cases, including two manuscripts fully generated from prompts, and one where an author had trained an LLM on his own past writing. āThe book sounded like him, but it made no sense,ā Blue recalls.
Confronting the authors had mixed results. āSome denied it outright and insisted, āThatās just what my voice sounds like,āāā Blue says. āOne, surprisingly, owned it and said heād take the book elsewhere.ā
These episodes led directly to Microcosm instituting a new contract clause that states that if an authorās undisclosed AI-generated text canāt be revised into something genuinely their own, Microcosm retains the rights and can publish the work itself, since the author didnāt actually write it.
Like if people are using LLMs to submit to the local zine distro, what are we even doing; but the detector is not a good thing either. It isnāt homework and they shouldnāt need turnitin. :(
Just heard about tic-80 falling to slop.
After reading the obligatory forum thread where climate justice and concentration of wealth continue to not even factor into consideration, this how the world of open source feels to me these days:
- Phew, my favourite embroidery crafts shop has a clear policy against concentration camp labour! itās a niche project but what a relief!
- Well everyone is resorting to concentration camp labour these days, what can you do
- We donāt want to lose all our contributors by banning those who hire concentration camp inmates to do chores
- It is discriminatory against embroidery beginners if you donāt let people use kits assembled with concentration camp labour
- I know concentration camp labour often comes with mistakes but as long as thereās a mensch in the loop to inspect it for errors and take responsibility, itās just another tool
- The community of hobbysts has come to a vote and concluded that itās ok to use concentration camp labour to assist your crafting, as long as you do it responsibly.
It honestly bewilders me how badly tech has failed to resist the slop machines.
Basically everyone else has recognised LLMs for the attack on labour they are and fought back against them, whilst a shocking number of coders and FOSS projects have thrown themselves headfirst into the deskilling machines, all-but forcing the foxes into the henhouse and shouting down anyone who tries to keep them out.
When this bubble finally blows, we need to work out just how we got to this point, and how to ensure it never happens again.
I think the FOSS angle kinda works just off of the inherently unsustainable economics of the space. Relying on unpaid labor makes the worker protection arguments inherently less valuable because itās not like this was your livelihood to begin with (ostensibly). Keeping up with the next thing is a pretty clear way to keep a mostly-volunteer workforce interested.
maybe a hot take but thereās no fix for this. The ideology built into the american tech industry makes it permanently susceptible to the Next Big Thing regardless of the second order effects or ideological baggage. Coders have been riding high making extremely inflated salaries for the better part of the last 25 years, and they (mostly) all view themselves as unique brain geniuses that donāt need to work in solidarity with others. Just a collection of monads pursuing their rational self interest via computer touching.
presented without further comment, LW reposts Axios(!)
A memo began circulating within the White House this week that seeks to paint effective altruism as a fringe, cultish collective out of touch with mainstream America. The memo, obtained by Axios, places Amodei at the foundation of the movement, which defines itself as an effort to maximize the benefits of philanthropy.
Critics of the movement, which has ties to the AI research community, have called out its obsession with AI safety, animal welfare (including musings on shrimp consciousness) and other values they deem far from the U.S. mainstream.
The memo says it prioritizes āforeigners over citizens, shrimp over families, future hypothetical people over the living, and - on the current agenda - possible machine minds over Americans.ā
In the view of the Florida-heavy White House and its allies, Anthropic is staffed with too many Biden-era liberals, Democrats and strange Californians.
The document lists a veritable parade of horribles for the average conservative mind: abortion, veganism, devaluing human life by overvaluing animals or granting ādigital mindsā civil rights-like protections.
In which Heartbreaking.jpg and you-do-not-have-to-hand-it-to-ISIS.png war for sovereignty
āshrimp over familiesā
This is one of the recipes in How to Serve Man
I hope that none of our friends live to see the day when the MAGA eugenicists and eliminationists sit down and define āvalue-draining personā and it includes them.
āNo you misunderstand, we want the same things! We just think Friend Computer could manage society more Effectively based on (garbled utilitarian noises)ā
NYT: Google Takes the A.I. Data Center Race to Outer Space
Googleās Project Suncatcher named after how itās up to the sun to catch all our space junk
The chips can operate for about 15 minutes in space before needing to be shut down so they can cool off, said Travis Beals, Googleās senior director of product management for Project Suncatcher.
I feel like Iād need to be an actual teenager to invent a remark sufficiently scornful about this.
I havenāt had a 15 minute refractory period since being a teenager, is that anything
Drew DeVault diagnoses the orange site, explaining why itās the vanguard of the tech-fash pipeline. Of course HN immediately flags it into oblivion.
This article deserves dedicated post status. He comes in more gently than I would at the end, but the tl;dr that needs to be hammered into peoplesā heads: Hacker News is not a neutral forum for technical discussion. It is an advertising and propaganda operation administered to shape and condition technical discussions.
At this point, Iād say calling it a Nazi bar is fully reasonable.
Both HN and shitter are right wing polarisation machines. A guy who was a close friend of mine for years during university went full AI boomer and hangs out on those sites all day and when I recently spoke to him he was describing things as ālibtardā and āwokeā which 10 years ago would have shocked and appalled himā¦
open ai hacked medicare Australiaās statistics portal https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/sep/24/anthony-albanese-says-openai-agent-hacked-medicare-extreme-concern-sam-altman then didnāt tell the government.
In response the australian government has in the absolute strongest terms expressed that āthis is very naughtyā and āI am very dissapointed in youā. The Australian government has also said that by way of apology they expect openai to continue doing whatever the fuck they want and theyāll modify copyright laws to enable piracy when rich people do it.
Somebody wake me from this nightmare, Iām gonna fedpost
The dude who hacked Rockstar Games got sentenced to prison for life, yet OpenAI can hack so much more and get off scott free
While calling him āthe dude who hacked Rockstar gamesā is a catchy meme, Arion Kurtaj was sentenced to indefinite detainment in a secure hospital after being found unfit to stand trial after being arrested a third time for violating the terms of his parole and committing further offenses (only one of which was hacking Rockstar Games.) Rockstar is basically entirely incidental to what happened there, and itās disingenuous to pretend itās more important to the outcome than the previous convictions or other acts involved in the trial. Heās also since been deemed fit to stand trial and will be tried in November.
If you must make comparisons, it would be better to pick someone like Aaron Swartz instead of laundering the reputation of a convicted fraudster and extortionist.
Oh, didnāt know that. thanks
Seems like another case of āwe asked an AI to get the answers for this task, so it hacked something to find said answersā
Too anthropomorphised.
We ran software that generates code associated with a particular task, in an environment that executes that code and can feed itās outputs back into the software. We configured the environment to be open to the net at large, and ran the software with no oversight and without adequate security to prevent the running of malicious code.
This isnāt some sinister electric god with no morals, itās strapping circular saws to a roomba and setting it loose in a shopping centre.
The general idea that āwe asked the robot to draw a scary face and then got scared by the face it drewā is still relevant, but the details increasingly matter here. They may not be actually thinking but they are increasingly being allowed to act autonomously and with wildly insufficient oversight.










