Can someone remind me why we stopped using Firefox a while back? There was some piece of news that broke everyone’s trust, but I can’t remember what Mozilla did. Was it a change in their user agreement?

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “We” didn’t stop using Firefox. Open source boycotts are complicated because the software is separate from the developers. You can keep using the software even if you disagree with the development organisation.

    Mozilla organisation is getting problematic for a whole lot of reasons. My issue with them is that they seem to be in the “more money than they know what to do with it” phase. They’re flush with cash, but it’s not reflecting to the product. If they buy an ad company and plan AI stuff, maybe things aren’t going well.

    Problem is, there’s no viable competing organisation. Protest forks of software don’t really work that well unless you can actually guarantee the development support. Compare this to what happened when OpenOfficeOrg successfully moved to LibreOffice - developers saw the old organisation didn’t work, so they made a new one that did.

  • bluegreenwookie@bookwormstory.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I stopped using it and went to chrome bc my adblock stopped working and i waited for a fix but it didn’t come. It worked fine on chrome.

    I went back to firefox bc my adblock stopped working but it worked fine on firefox.

    these two events are several years apart if that wasn’t clear

  • Nyticus@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I stopped using Firefox for four core reasons:

    Their investment into AI How they submit and work with their Google overlords to some degree Their browser putting in more and more unnecessary and unasked features (like Firefox account for one) Their Terms of Service

  • bigDottee@geekroom.tech
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    I never stopped using it. There are privacy issues with all browsers. I like how Firefox works, but I regularly end up using Firefox, chrome, and edge all at the same time. I use them for some compartmentalization of my tasks and work lol

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 days ago

    When? There have been a few times people stopped using Firefox in large numbers.

    One of them was when Chrome first came out. Firefox (and every other browser) at the time ran every site in one process. As sites became more reliant on Javascript, which was usually poorly written, that meant any one tab having a problem made other sites and even the browser’s own UI unresponsive, or sometimes crashed the whole browser. Chrome’s multiprocess model was a revelation. Firefox didn’t get its own implementation until 2016.

    Recently, there’s been some movement away from Firefox due to Mozilla making decisions people don’t feel align with open source, the open web, and privacy. The one that has me looking at forks is the planned addition of terms of use to the browser. Terms of use are for an ongoing relationship between a service operator and a user; Firefox is local software I’m operating myself on a computer I own. Its fine for optional online services like Sync to have terms of use, but the browser should work without those.

    • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      1 day ago

      I asked ChatGPT is similar question earlier this week. This was the answer.

      While Mozilla has not been found to sell user tracking data in the conventional sense, the introduction of features like PPA (Privacy-Preserving Attribution) and changes in privacy policy language have understandably caused concern among users. These developments suggest a shift towards balancing user privacy with the need to support advertising models. Users prioritizing privacy should stay informed about these changes and adjust their browser settings accordingly.

  • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The thing is, I never have. Chrome is absolute hot garbage and spyware, all the Chromium forks are all flawed and bugged and still feed into Google’s dominance because of engine and stupid Manifest bullshit. Firefox, despite all the stupid things Mozilla did and still does just works the best and is not Chromium.

    • HKPiax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Honestly, as a “non-power” Firefox user, the only issues I’m experiencing is when Google purposely slows down or messes with me simply because I use Firefox (e.g., YouTube).

      • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Dunno, Youtube works fine for me, watching without account. I don’t use anything else from Google, so can’t say if anything else is shit.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 days ago

        New Chromium framework for browser extensions that severely limits their functionality. It neuters adlockers.

        • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          2 days ago

          It didn’t break adblockers “at the time”. It broke them intentionally. That was by design. Google is an advertising company dabbling in other areas. They don’t want a browser that can properly block their primary revenue.

        • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          It was intentional to block/break adblockers. Google is worlds largest advertiser…

        • Noerknhar@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Understood, that’s something to be expected by Google, but complete shit.

          However, adblockers still work these days - see Vivaldi, so they found a workaround?

          • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 days ago

            There is no workaround as most browsers download extensions from Google’s extension repository and they don’t allow extensions that don’t follow their bullshit manifest. Ironically, only Opera has its own extensions repository/store that can do that. Others rely on their own built in adblockers.

      • Sandbar_Trekker@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Google sells it as an updated extension framework to improve security, privacy, and performance of extensions… But it also nerfs adblockers ability to block all ads.

        There are some forks from chrome that haven’t implemented the new manifest thing. So if you really need to, look for those.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I never fully did, but I did end up using Chromium more than I wanted to:

    1. Some poorly written sites refuse to work with FF. My water company, for example. They eventually fixed it after I complained multiple times. Now they display a warning that it’s “Optimized for Chrome” but no longer flat out prevent FF from logging in (you know, to pay bills and such).
    2. FF Desktop still doesn’t support PWAs, and their recent update says they’re working on it, but they’re half-assing it (installed web apps will still have the menu bars, address, bar etc). I self-host a lot of web applications and want them to appear like native apps. Hence, Chromium.
    3. There was some recent ToS / Privacy Policy change, and everyone was knee-jerking “time to abandon Firefox” as if there’s anywhere better to go. (This is probably what you’re thinking of)
    4. A good while back, Chrom(ium) was just flat-out faster. That’s been a while, and I think when FF’s “Quantum” update (or whatever it was called) came out in like 2016 or 2017, it put it back on par.
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    I believe you’re thinking of a ToS change where the wording was incredibly vague, leading to some outlets to claim they were selling browsing data to 3rd parties and AI modelers. They changed it right after to specify that the data they were using wasn’t browsing data, and the data they did gather wouldn’t be used for AI. They are not as invasive as google, but you’re subject to Google on Firefox because of the ubiquity of their telemetry and search optimizations across websites. Firefox with an add-on such as noscript is much better than Chrome still, in my opinion. At the very least, it’s nice to have a browser that doesn’t work to undermine its own add-on functionalities.

    • VodkaSolution @feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      This. It has been everywhere here around, if someone denies it, is lying! It was nothing in the end but in the meantime I tried Zen (based on FF) and it’s aesthetically more pleasing to me