A society is always about 3 days of hunger away from a violent revolution. Start your clocks.

  • Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Good, it is completely unnecessary. It’s a bad solution to an old problem that already has much better solutions out there that are much more accessible too. They only made it so people will rely on them for everything and stop trusting others, but thankfully it failed. Canonical should be ashamed of themselves for ever trying this snap thing.

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    SNAP has traditionally been entirely federally funded, but is administered by states. That means the shutdown’s impact on SNAP and when benefits will start to dry up will vary state by state.

    So about those government contracts for immigration, you would think some of those states that raked in a lot of money, could perhaps use that ill-gotten money to at least benefit the residents of their states.

    Funny that Florida got more than half a billion dollars from the government the day before the shutdown, but they just can’t find it within their hearts or their budget to use any of that money to feed families relying on food stamps in their state. Wonder where it’s going instead?

  • madjo@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    This will destroy the US economy. I hope you like standing in bread lines…

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    this is a disaster for the people affected (and also every society is 3 days without food before violent revolutions and all that) but also IMO these programs should ideally be paid for by the states anyways, not the federal government. i also think that taxes should go to the states instead of the federal government, and the states then forward whatever amount is appropriate to the federal government. that would make the states more resilient against these kinds of federal fraud.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      On the one hand, maybe. On the other, many states (mostly red ones) are also cruel and incompetent.

      Also, the federal government has vastly more funding power than the state government.

      • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Shame millions of leftists had advanced warning of Project 2025, chose to ignore it and boycott the only viable other candidate anyway, and now are living with the concenquences of that inaction.

        But they’re still only blaming Kamala and the Dem party, rather than taking a moment for self reflection as to how they willingly surrendered the country to fascism and damned marginalized groups to hell on Earth.

        Kamala was a shitty candidate, but the left who boycotted the vote owns their own inaction. It’s not Kamala’s fault everyone had a year advance warning on Project 2025 and chose to do nothing anyway.

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          A friend of mine was sincerely advancing the idea that it’s better that trump wins, because less-bad candidates like Harris just let people coast by without doing much as the world gets worse. He thinks something like Trump will be really bad, and people will demand more radical change. I think you can call that acellerationism. Pretty easy position to hold as a wealthy professional who owns property, I guess.

          Personally, I’d rather people organize and try to make the world better without the worst people in the world having most of the power. Seems easier that way to me.

          • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I find this to be the most common occurrence of accelerationists.

            The most willing to send millions to their graves to achieve what they believe is socialism, while they themselves will never pick up a rifle and fight for it.

            They’re identical to every fat cat chicken-hawk piece of shit that sends young Americans to die in wars for the profit of political donors.

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Nothing we could have done would have made genocide, the MoSt lEtHaL miLiTary electable. The only thing we could have done was riot to get a candidate and policies capable of winning.

          • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            You’re missing the point entirely.

            Everyone agrees Kamala was shit. That’s not the point.

            The point is millions of leftists, the people who are supposed to be advocates for marginalized peoples, absolutely refused to be advocates for said marginalized peoples when the easiest possible way to do it was to show up and vote for Kamala.

            Was Kamala shit? Yes.

            Would all these marginalized people be sent to concentration camps whole the government abandons the rule of law entirely and ends democracy under Kamala?

            Obviously no.

            Yet so many millions of leftists, especially those in swing states, decided to surrender these marginalized people to the fourth Reich instead.

            • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              The only lesson here is not to get to the point where the only alternative to fascism are libs who would prefer fascism to socialism. We lost when we allowed the dems to run on unelectable policy.

              • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                My dude, that decision was made almost 250 years ago.

                We were getting to that point by primary neo-libs out of office and putting in more and more progressives. Progressives willing to end the Electoral College.

                That is entirely up in flames now. US democracy is gone. Its not “at risk”, its already fucking dead. Straight up gone and never to come back.

                Boycotting Kamala didn’t make us rise above the 2 party system, it placed us firmly in a permenant 1 party system under fascism.

                • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Nothing we could have done would have changed the outcome then. You can’t make sending the cops to kick the shit out of the activated college students who make up your ground game popular.

    • MochiGoesMeow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      I hated that she sounded like a politician dodging questions with nonsense answers. She should have been direct and stopped worrying about being a different direction than Biden.

      But yes with all those flaws she would have been better than Trump by miles.

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        fun fact: i think it has nothing to do with it. it’s just that trump is a reality tv star and tv stars and entertainers tend to get elected in democracies (see england, italy, USA) because they know how to present themselves to the people in an “entertaining” way and also because harris refused to focus on the real buying power of people.

    • LuigiMaoFrance@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Maybe she shouldn’t have committed genocide in Gaza if having a chance of getting elected was important to her

      • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Hey dipshit,

        Trump supported the genocide in Gaza too.

        The difference is Kamala wouldn’t be committing a genocide against minorities in the US too, while sending the military and her own Gestapo to US cities to crush dissent.

        Trump IS doing that, we knew over a year in advance to the election that he would do that, yet y’all refused to support the one thing that would’ve prevented that, which was Kamala, like her or not.

        Hope your hollow virtue signal of sticking it to the Dems is worth the pro-genocide option of letting Trump win and commit even more genocide, including inside the US.

        • Dagrothus@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          These people dont actually care about Gaza. They just hate America. Makes a lot more sense when you realize that.

  • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    3 days ago

    This administration needs to be concerned about what happens when you have millions of people with nothing to lose anymore.

        • GladiusB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          Totally. But they have been begging for “Civil War”. Like it’s some Hero’s Journey and people won’t die. It’s so short sided and dumb I can’t believe they actually believe it’s for the better.

          • ameancow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            You can only get your civil war if there are two clear sides, divisible by geography and cultural lines.

            When you just have a widespread, starving population, you get mobs and mass riots and government leadership dragged out of their homes and offices.

            I am not sure at all what their game is. I know they want the chaos but surely they can’t be so dumb that they think this will… oh yeah, lol caught myself there. They’re that dumb.

            • phx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 days ago

              DT is probably just thinking back fondly of his last visit to North Korea.

              “Hey, what if I did that?!”

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I can’t imagine the people in the US fighting against the government because to have a will to fight, you have to have something worth protecting in your life, and i’m pretty sure that social cohesion has been eroded so much in the USA that people simply won’t care about their neighbours enough to actually fight and risk their lifes for them, but what do i know.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    258
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    But it’s OK: Kristi Noem gets two $170,000,000 private jets, Trump gets a golden ballroom, a luxury airliner and billions of dollars in bribes, Argentina gets $40,000,000,000, and ICE get all the weaponry they desire plus big fat bonuses for hitting their kidnapping targets. So as you sit hungry through the holiday season, know that your tax dollars are at least giving someone a good time.

    • imposedsensation@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      118
      ·
      4 days ago

      Don’t forget the $250 million that he feels he is owed by the DOJ for being prosecuted, which he intends to instruct the DOJ to settle and pay.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Let’s instead phrase it that ICE gets more budget for militarization than the entire Israeli military.

      Just let that sink in for a bit. ICE and resources allocated than the Israeli military.

      It’s the 16th most funded militarized force in the world.

      Essentially equal to Canada’s military budget.

      Shits fucked

  • daannii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s mostly going to be the elderly who suffer. People just forget about old people. They can’t get out and go stand in line at food pantries.

    Sometimes they don’t have anyone checking on them very often.

    Most don’t know how to get online and find services and such.

    If you have an elderly neighbor or family member. Try to check with them and see if they need help.

    • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      if there isn’t a government, why pay taxes to it?

      actually, stupid question. but what percentage of people could do a tax strike, resulting in the government having no funds or means to go after all of them. and collapsing?

        • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          There is the idea of taxing them 2%, chosen bellow inflation, so their wealth would still grow, it is a tax that they wont even feel. And it is ridiculously bellow what everyone else pays.

          Yet, even that, painfully compromised idea is considered ridiculous by the rich and powerful.

          Their greed knows no bounds

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Vast majority of working people have federal taxes automatically deducted from their checks before they even see a dime. Most people get refunds at the end of the year instead of having to pay, so it would be up to the self-employed and basically anyone who doesn’t file a simple form to start withholding their taxes.

        I guess we could talk about getting everyone to adjust their paycheck withholdings but most people live under the assumption that “everything will blow over by next year” whatever the circumstances.

      • DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Well they print money so not really any amount of people, but at this point you are probably better off just paying taxes to your state, because the federal government is mostly just a Mafia middleman anyways, which has become very apparent under trump. Taking people’s own tax money away from them because they don’t like him or his terrible policies.

        The reality is almost all of this money, well the part that is leftover to give back to the people, is given back to the states anyways, just with a bunch of strings and hands in it. The federal government likes this so that they can manipulate what is taught in schools and road laws and everything else. The states rely on getting their citizens money back from the federal government and so they get this defacto management by executive agencies and stuff.

      • daannii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        The issue is they will just write IOUs. It’s not like they can’t. They can also literally print money. So.

        • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          yeah the federal government can essentially print arbitrary amounts of money through the federal reserve bank if it has control of it, yes.

          the only way out (to prevent the federal government from having infinite, literally unlimited economic buying power) is to devalue the dollar in such a way that the dollar becomes completely worthless, i.e. its value goes to zero. but this will only happen if people stop accepting the dollar as a valuable currency, i.e. if people switch to using alternative currencies instead, like the euro (€) or something else entirely.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    169
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Just a reminder that no one steals food in America. If you thought you saw someone shoplifting food, no you didn’t! That never happened, you imagined it, turn around and walk away, nothing to report here.

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      3 days ago

      Not American, but I totally didn’t see someone shoplifting a couple of weeks ago and I just carried on with my business, but on the way out I heard another customer grassing them out. What is the world coming to?

      You know what you hardly ever see - billionaires telling on each other for their crimes for no reason. Solidarity, people!

    • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      Duh, the U.S. government stopped SNAP payments and Trump will soon say nobody is poor or hungry here. Thus shoplifting is impossible, if you see it or ghosts, you’re literally hallucinating.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Republicans don’t give a fuck if they kill people by withholding healthcare, obviously they don’t give a fuck if people starve.

      Maybe that’s why they love Israel so much?

  • foodandart@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    126
    ·
    4 days ago

    Thing is, it’s gonna hit the rural MAGA folks the hardest.

    There’s a part of me that wants to go “I told you so…” which is expected…

    But the more cunning part of me wants to leverage their hunger, dismay and rage and work to aim it squarely against Trump and the entire MAGA movement.

        • hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          50
          ·
          4 days ago

          Who isn’t? It’s the “Schumer shutdown” and what did they say on Fox News? Something like “open the government and then discuss”. They eat that shit up.

          Who do you imagine is going to blame the republicans? Trump is untouchable because they’ll just invent some story to justify their blind faith.

          Hell, I had a family member tell me “you got to read between the lines. Don’t take anything he says literally”

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yup. Chomsky talked about the Angry White Man syndrome and how they were right to be angry, but they were angry at the wrong people.

        Faux and other wingnut welfare outfits didn’t run in the red for years on end (maybe some indefinitely) for no reason. All that infrastructure - Faux, Washington Times, hate radio, Regnery publishing, etc…is all there to properly indoctrinate a certain percentage of the population into believing all their problems are a result of anything else BUT Republican and conservative ideology.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’d like to have empathy, and publicly I won’t call out these hypocrites, but I honestly can’t care less if these fuckers starve. I feel bad for the children and helpless that are affected, but the others that voted for this are reaping what they sow.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, but “he’s not hurting the people he needs to be hurting”.

        I try to have compassion for people that have made bad choices in their lives, but fucking hell, it is really hard to sustain that for people that voted to hurt other people. Actively wanting that to happen. Not to really improve their own lot in life, but to hurt others.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 days ago

          Exactly. I don’t enjoy or actively seek the hurting of these individuals, but I can’t keep caring about people that repeatedly shoot themselves in the foot. I can empathize with people that make a mistake. I will go so far as to say that people that voted for Trump in 2016 fucked up, but that they made a forgivable mistake. I can’t do that for anyone that voted for him in 2024. There are no excuses. He was a known commodity that detailed exactly how he was going to rule if elected again. Nothing that he had done since January is a surprise at all. There are plenty of rural residents that are grouped with the majority that voted for Trump that unfortunately are being punished for the actions of their neighbors. I have the most sympathy for those families as they aren’t just most heavily affected, but they are grouped up with those other terrorist supporters. The rest, other than the innocent children, can sleep in the bed they made with empty stomach and crippling debt.

    • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      They’ll whisper “owned the libs” with their keto breath and die of starvation before they admit their orange god is a fraud.

    • Aneb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m currently getting funding from my mother who is also about to get furloughed for working for the military. So she is losing double what she sowed in the election. You fuck around and your family loses, and your family’s friends lose. I’m currently in the trickle down era!

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s hitting visible minorities the hardest. That’s clear. God forbid you speak Spanish and look “Mexican”… MAGA will come in at second-worst, perhaps, and some of them will be happy about that.

      • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I’m a moderately intimidating-looking white guy and the fear in the eyes of all the little latina moms in the supermarket when they look at me… It’s so tragic. I’m just trying to be as polite and accommodating as possible whenever I can to quell their fears. Feels like the social fabric is just melting around us.

      • regedit@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        then they’ll only resent you

        Yeah, then. They already do resent us because some propagandists told them to. We are their enemy because we try to improve the lives of all, even those they hate. I hope that hate can satiate their hunger next month, because that’s all they’ll be left with.

    • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Playing these people experience the consequences of their voting decisions instead of bailing them out is necessary. They get to vote for the nasty racist things they want and they don’t feel the consequences and nothing will change until that changes

  • sampao@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    4 days ago

    Not an American but if the government shutsdown and they are cancelling programs, shouldn’t you not have to pay taxes for that time period?

    • Demonmariner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      4 days ago

      Most working people have their estimated taxes deducted from their pay before they receive it. They don’t have an option to not pay.

      • Sunflier@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        4 days ago

        Well, that one congressional district that has their congress person being kept out should definitely not have to pay because that would be a taxation when they have no representation.

        • fodor@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          47
          ·
          4 days ago

          Also, several congresspeople have said that they “don’t represent the Democrats” in their districts. I think that, too, should immediately exempt those residents from taxes.

      • homura1650@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        You can fill out a form and send it to your HR/payroll department to adjust your withholdings at anytime, and they are supposed to do so no questions asked.

        The employee not paying their income tax does not actually have an adverse impact on the employer, so they don’t care. Of course, the employee still has the legal obligation to pay; but breaking tax law is pretty inherent with tax protest.

      • Sunflier@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        They don’t have an option to not pay.

        Sort of. When you start employment, you fill out a whole bunch of paperwork related to taxes and pay. Most people opt to have standard tax withholdings, but you can opt to get the full paycheck with no withholdings. It just requires you to pay a huge bill at the end of every year out of your bank account.

        If you’re smart and time it right, you can take what would be deducted and put it into a 12-month certificate. Then, when the year ends, you take that principle and pay the taxes. You just get to keep the interest.

        Most people don’t because taxes and the deductions from the paycheck change so much every year. It can be hard to figure out and a pain to have to refile the paperwork to change the deductions to see what this paycheck’s deduction should be.

        • Hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          4 days ago

          If your income does not have withholdings you are required to make payments quarterly. If you owe above a certain amount when filing your tax returns you have to pay a penalty.

          You can write exempt on the withholding form to stop your employer from withholding, but the forms are very clear that it is only to be done if you owe no tax. Unless you earn less than $16k or whatever the standard deduction is for you, it would be unwise to not make advanced tax payments.

          You can file your forms differently to avoid paying the feds, or delaying those payments, but you do so at personal risk.

        • relativestranger@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          i used to do that, claim exempt and just pay at the end of the year. if what you end up paying is over a certain amount, they will get you for penalties and interest.

          • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            $1,000 is that number, or at least it was a few years ago. The IRS requires quarterly estimated payments. Although from what I could tell (not a tax expert), it would’ve been fine for me to just pay the whole sum on Dec 31.

    • Guy Ingonito@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      It would be like withholding rent from your landlord until they repaired your heating. You’d have to still place the money in escrow to prove to a judge you had the money intended to pay.