Pretty much the title. It get quite hot here in Europe.

  • BenLeMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I would make sure to secure the panels somehow so they don’t get blown away by wind, and maybe check that the reflection doesn’t cause a hazard, e.g. to passing traffic.

  • Beangut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Aluminium foil has a shiny side and a dull side too so make sure you use the shinier side for a bit more efficiency.

  • Krusty@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The foam itself is quite reflective. And would look more like curtains than a crack house.

    What is the hot glue gun for? That’ll melt the foam…

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    As long as it’s not across the whole ceiling of a bar.

    It’s a bit off topic, but damn. If you got a nickle for every time a double digit number of people were killed by that exact scenario, you’d have more than one nickle, which is ridiculous.

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Foil is electrically conductive, many cheap insulation installers in Australia were killed or shocked nailing foil insulation into ceiling spaces by driving nails through live wires (or still touching foil while a previously dead circuit became live) after a government stimulus program which subsidised insulation

          • psud@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            It was Kevin Rudd’s policy, he copped some slack for it when people died. Kevin Rudd was known as Kevin 07 as he won the prime minister position in 2007, just in time for the GFC. And it was good in that it improved the economy, bad in that it encouraged a lot of insulation scams

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Thank you, that is terrifying! I have things I would like to hang on the wall but my nice stud finder lights up a little in its electric meter in some of the areas I want, and I don’t trust anything when it comes to messing with that.

  • Hubi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you have single pane windows, the foil needs to be on the outside of the window or you run the risk of shattering the glass. If it’s a double of triple pane you can place it on the inside.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      That is a fantastic tip I would have never considered but yeah, that’s gonna be a big temperature differential!

      • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        More panes = more mass. More mass = lower average temperature. Lower average temperature = less chance of sudden cracks or shattering

        • DeeBeeDouble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Hmm, but don’t you think that over the entire day they’d heat up to the same temp? Sure, more mass, but that just means it’ll take longer to heat up to the same temp as the single pane. And I assume the day is long enough.

          • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Sudden shatter happens when something is heated or cooled so quickly that parts of it expand or constrict at different rates. Since the larger thermal mass of the thicker glass will spread the heat more, it won’t heat up as quickly, thus reducing the chance of a sudden shatter. It may well reach the same temperature, but doing so over a longer period is still safer

  • Soulphite@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    It can’t hurt. Make sure the aluminum isnt reflecting sunlight in high concentration onto anything in close proximity as this could create a fire hazard. It looks rather matte though so you should be fine.

  • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Works like a charm. I’ve done this on all my windows and I’m waiting for the police to break down my door. It looks sus af but I don’t care because it’s cool at least.

  • IWW4@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t understand the on-top part.

    It is a good idea to cover windows when it is really hot outside. Made sure you are allowing your attic to properly ventilate. So providing that covering the windows doesn’t interfere with that you will be fine.

    Also there is no need to use Tinfoil. A white surface will have the same effect.

  • fullsquare@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Reflective side out, and on the outside this should work. Aluminum foil or a thermal blanket would also work and are lighter

  • etchinghillside@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I do this with “reflective bubble insulation” brand: Reflectix with a spray adhesive.

    Unfortunately it looks like a reflective surface work best with an air gap so directly against the window might not be doing much. But certainly the insulation will.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I think superfoil is the generic name (or possibly another brand).

      I used suction cups, with thumb screw threads to attach them. Just poke a hole and push it through on each corner. It also holds it slightly clear of the glass. Suction cups also mean you can apply it either inside the glass, or outside (better, but harder).