• BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I love little expressions and turns of phrase. English is basically the remnants of other languages at this point.

    It’s the world’s pidgin, and the world ain’t over yet.

  • GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 hours ago

    English is already a mess. The only people I’ve ever met who get persnickety about it with non-native speakers are assholes. I’d rather ‘correct’ them with a swift kick in the kisser.

    Don’t be embarrassed if your English isn’t perfect. It’s normal, and it’s okay. We’re all learning.

  • sunbytes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It may be just how normalised it is for English speakers to hear people speaking English imperfectly.

    There’s no shame or judgement in it. But when you find whimsy, oh boy.

    I still say “delicious” in the way my Greek coworker did almost a decade ago, because it sounds better

    And my dog trainer called my dog’s arse his anoos one time and now that’s all we call it. Talking about mine? Arse. The dog’s? Anoos.

    • darthelmet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      For me, I watch tons of anime and I always find it funny when the characters try to speak English, especially if it’s supposed to be a native English speaker. There are also all of the loan words which they’ve modified to fit better into the flow of the language, but they sound funny/cutesy to me/English speakers.

      I am very careful to remind myself that anime isn’t real life and I’d never make fun of a real life Japanese person trying to speak English, but for anime it’s part of its quirky charm.

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      My wife worked with a guy from Korea and when he got upset at work he would say ‘I go to mad!’

      We randomly say that when we get upset. It’s a more fun way of expressing your anger.

  • Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I was taking a summer afternoon nap with my girlfriend (now wife) and got up to look out the window for some reason about 8 years ago. She got up in a sleepy haze and said “Are you leave without say goodbye?”

    We’ve been saying that to each other since.

  • farmgineer@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    18 hours ago

    In Japan, if you use a word wrong, people will almost certainly not tell you so as not to embarrass you unless your mistake is sufficiently more embarrassing or insulting.

    • cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Ya, I thought they told you that your Japanese sucked by saying “your japanese is really good.” And it’s only when they stop commenting on the quality of your Japanese that you know you are near native levels. Even then, if you don’t look ethnically Japanese they still might keep saying it, so there’s really no way of knowing.

      • TheEmpireStrikesDak@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        What? Noooo, so this is how I find out!

        I studied Japanese for about 11 years. I used to work in the west end, so I’d have Japanese tourists to practise on. They’d always be like, aaah, sugeeee! And tell me how good my Japanese was. I started speaking in Kansai ben just to throw them off and it always made them laugh. But tbh my Japanese was crap, I just thought I was doing a good enough job bluffing. As soon as they started talking in Japanese, I’d have to say kiku koto ikkomo dekehen waaaaaa 😅

        • TronBronson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I studied Japanese for like 6 months before I went and they were GUSHING at me spitting out me 15 phrases and trying to understand their words. if you’re japanese and reading this now ILY so much and thank you for making that trip the best of my life.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      16 hours ago

      My grandmother liked to tell the story of when she visited in Japan in the 60s and greeted a bunch of people by saying “Idaho.”

  • bitteroldcoot@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    214
    ·
    23 hours ago

    One nice thing about English, it will lexical borrow from you in an instant.

    We just love new ways to say old boring stuff.

    • wet_bones@lemmy.4d2.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Ironically, same with Japanese. They have an entire alphabet dedicated to foreign words, Katakana. You want a hamburger and a beer? That’s a “ハンバーガーとビール” (Hanbāgā to Biru). Coffee from Starbucks on your way to work? That’s a “ドライブスルーコーヒー” (Doraibusurūkohi - a drive-thru coffee). Better fried chicken than anyone has a right to can be found at the “コンビニ” (Konbini - aka the convenience store). Learning Japanese it’s rife with these borrowed words. Half the time it’s “you’re fucking kidding.” The other half the time it’s learning some insane formalism that makes saying “thank you” take five minutes.

      • SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Awhile back, I watched an anime about camping. It was chill, and cute, and I enjoyed it. But every time they stopped to discuss some kind of camping equipment, it was all English loan words, and it drove me a bit bonkers.

        What do you mean Japanese just straight up borrowed the phrase “ground tarp” from English??? Surely they already have words for that!

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Ya Katakana was actually super intuitive if you could recognize and pronounce the symbols. I was amazed at how well I got along there with basically just the alphabet lmaoo.

      • k0e3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 hours ago

        What’s cool is how English then adds those loanwords or portmanteau back into its lexicon like karaoke or, as I’m seeing more recently, egg sando. I really love how languages do that.

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        One of my favorite Dogen videos, about how many loanwords can sound normal in a conversation

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pW4AiEqKGto

        He had another one I think recently about a dentist who kept dropping random English words in sentences while talking with Dogen but he had katakana pronunciation so it was basically impossible to understand (one example was he threw in the word “jaw” but said “jō” instead).

    • Snailpope@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      120
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I have been saying it for years, English is a very informal and open language, have fun with it. Sky water is not technically a wrong way to refer to rain, liquid laundry soup is absolutely a sauce for your laundry, dish bricks, day star, the list goes on

      • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        85
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I think this is one of the reasons why English (or it’s descendants) will forever be the international language of trade. If it’s not your first language, it’s damn difficult to make yourself sound like a native speaker, but it’s damn easy to make yourself understood.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I think you’re confusing a reasonably short period in recent history with “forever”.

          In History there were quite a lot of “international languages of trade” other than English. It seems to depend very much on which nations were the top empire of the age and because the last two top empires were English-speaking countries (first Britain, then after that the United States), the English language has been dominant as a second language for a over a century now, but before that the English language already existed in a form very similar to the modern form and yet it wasn’t at all an “international language of trade” (in fact, at least in Europe, before English it was French that was the dominant language of trade).

          I bet that the next “international language of trade” will be Chinese.

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          22 hours ago

          On the flip side, a lot of other languages have retained structures which require a detailed knowing of grammar in part because they haven’t needed to be learned by amateurs.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I speak several languages, most of which are Romance languages (such as French and Italian) which have a specific word order which pretty close to english (though adjective come after nouns rather than before, plus there are some additional verbal times though those are uncommon to use).

            Amongst those I also speak Dutch and German, which have quite a different word order (though, curiously, Dutch from Belgium has a similar word order to French) and I constantly fuck it up (especially in German, which is the one of the two I speak worse) and the natives always understand me.

            In my experience learning two of those languages just by living there (and with people that are learning my own native language), it’s using the wrong words that confuses people, then using the wrong accent (mainly by putting the emphasis in the wrong syllable) and only as a far third is word order and even that only in specific cases such expressions (where it’s the whole expression as is that has a meaning, rather the meaning being a composition of the meaning of the individual words in it).

            In my experience there really is no special quality of the English language that makes it easier to understand when people use a wrong word order.

          • pet the cat, walk the dog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            There weren’t many amateurs desiring to learn English back in eleventh—fifteenth centuries, when it was losing the remaining complexity in the grammar.

            • raef@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              There were a lot of native French speakers in England at that time, so a bunch of normalizing like what happened a couple hundred years earlier with the Norse meeting Anglo-Saxons

              • pet the cat, walk the dog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Idk about Vikings, but to my knowledge Normans didn’t give a crap about English, speaking their language among the ruling class, and all documents were in French. This is evidenced by the fact that there’s little written record of how English developed at the time. On the other hand, French was perceived as prestigious, since people had to deal with the ruling class and bureaucracy in French, thus many ‘high-society’ words were borrowed into English — hence typically when talking about everyday matters, the words are mostly of Germanic or Norse origin, and grandiose abstract ideas or upper-class life are French/Latin.

                It’s not like trade with Normans started only after the conquest, after all.

                • raef@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Yes, and because of that there was a lot of interaction and blending, right up to the point where trials were required to be performed in English in the mid-14th century, then in the 15th everything was switched to English. The Peterborough Chronicle perfectly demonstrates the transition from Old English to Middle. It was written over about a hundred years (11th to 12th Century) and gradually starts incorporating French vocabulary and dropping old Germanic grammar.

            • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I’m not paid specifically to speak English, but I feel like meetings would go a lot longer without it

          • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            22 hours ago

            True, though I would personally count that as a bad thing. Purity of language, to me is irrelevant. That opinion may be coloured by the fact that I’m a native English speaker, and there hasn’t been anything resembling purity in this language for thousands of years. To me, the point of language is open communication. Any impediment to that is a negative.

          • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Whereas English has adopted so many idioms from other languages with different grammar that we’re entirely comfortable with the exotic phrasing, or if it’s ambiguous we make puns and/or poetry from it.

      • NABDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I remember an interview with Lisa Kudrow in which she described her French boyfriend’s failure to remember the English word for toes, and said they were foot fingers.

        English: if the people you’re talking to understand what you’re saying, you’re ok. Even if the people you’re talking to don’t understand what you’re saying, you’re still ok. Just be fancy with your words, and everyone will like it.

            • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              It’s the same in Dutch - “aardapple” - but using the Dutch words for earth and apple rather than the French ones.

              And don’t get me started on French numbering - for example 98 is “four twenties eigtheen”.

              One doesn’t get it for one’s own language because all the weird stuff is “normal” but when you’re learning other languages you discovered they’re all riddled with funny constructs like this (and then there are expressions, which are often hilarious - for example on of the Dutch expression for wasting time on small details literally translates to “fucking ants”)

            • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              10 hours ago

              I wonder if the meaning of pomme was broader in Old French, like how meat (from mete) used to mean food in Old English.

              • 🧟‍♂️ Cadaver@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Yes it was the case, broadly pomme meant fruit.

                Originally tomatoes were called pommes d’amour. There is pommes de terre (potatoes) pommes de pin (pinecones). If we would translate literally pomme de pin it would give us pineapple.

                There were also other fruits beginning with pomme originally but I can’t seem to recall them.

              • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Pomme comes from latin pomum which could be used for any fruit, apple specifically was malum.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I still like the theory that the industrial revolution kicked off in England due to the English language.

        English has an amalgam of several different root languages. This gives it an unusual amount of flexibility and granularity. This helps hugely with crystallising newer ideas into words. This, in turn gave English a slight advantage over France, Germany etc.

        • pet the cat, walk the dog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          This gives it an unusual amount of flexibility

          English grammar is the opposite of flexible, since it relies on word order where other languages use inflections. In Russian, you can often jumble the word order, and the meaning wouldn’t change. Vocabulary of Russian was extensively borrowed from Greek, Arabic and Turkic languages in middle ages, German and French during the eighteenth-nineteenth centuries, and English in the twentieth, particularly in regard to trade, new technology, or societal developments. If you pay attention, you’ll notice that a language borrows or invents words when there’s a shade of meaning missing in the existing vocabulary, that is precisely represented by the new word. None of that has anything to do with industrial development, as you may have noticed from the fact that Russia was an agrarian country into early twentieth century.

          Your idea is a form of linguistic relativity, which has only some evidence for a small subset of it.

        • kolmaskommentoija@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Like 25% of English words are straight from Latin, and up to 75% have etymological roots in Latin (according to one Latin professor). And the grammatical rules are not divided equally by the “source” languages, either. It is an amalgam, but the flexibility stemming from the roots, is not so simple.

          (Also maybe hilariously in this context, as a native Finnish speaker, to me English appears as a very stiff language. In my own, word order does not really matter, you can basically create as many new words as you like, with combining words and switching the endings to change their grammatical role, and most words can be bent, to have a lot of different nuance with just tweaking the endings a bit. The classic funny example being: juoksen, juoksentelisinkohan / I run, I wonder if I should run aimlessly around in short bursts.)

          • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            My favourite examples of English rigidity are adjectival hierarchy and ablaut reduplication. Very few native English speakers realise they apply either of these rules and yet they are applied almost without exception.

          • cynar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Oh they do, but the weird multi root nature of English, and it’s tendency to aggressively ransack other languages for vocabulary tends to give it a little more wiggle room for describing ideas. The cost being it’s evil to learn, compared to a lot of languages. Just try reading the poem “The chaos” aloud.

            • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I speak 7 different european languages and they’re all like that.

              It’s not by chance that “yogurt” is pretty much the same word in just about all languages (different spelling at times, similar sounding), being originally a Turkish word, and similarly for “helicopter” which comes from the Greek, whilst all the ways to say “tea” in the whole wide world pretty much derive from just three root words - tea, cha and chai.

              My own native language - Portuguese - seems to have spread around the world for just nautical terms around sailing and pretty much nothing else which kinda makes sense since at one point when Portugal was an empire, that’s the technology is developed. (Curiously the word in India for a certain kind of bread - “Pao” - derives from the Portuguese word for bread - “Pão” - probably because the Indian city of Goa was controlled by Portugal for a couple of centuries),

            • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              it’s tendency to aggressively ransack other languages for vocabulary

              I feel like this hasn’t happened as much as people think in the last century or so, it’s much more the other way around, almost every language now adds a lot of english vocabulary.

                • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  the word first appeared in English in the later part of the 19th century. By the mid-20th century smorgasbord was being used outside of food-related contexts to refer to something that comprises a mixture or assemblage of different parts.

                  Source

                  You got anything more recent?

      • Venator@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Not sure what a dish brick is, but yeah, the others make sense 👍

        Edit: just figured it out: it’s a Lego piece shaped like a dish

  • zib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Can confirm, this is basically how it goes in Texas. Almost a decade ago, my best friend and I were browsing this little hole in the wall shop in central TX run by an elderly Japanese couple. They got to chatting with us and at one point, said we were “forever friends”. I’ve been using that phrase to describe us ever since.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    In japan don’t you just get jouzu’d for any less than native equivalency and/or for looking too gaijin

  • button_masher@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    20 hours ago

    One phrase I have eaten from Joe Abercrombie for anything eloquenty put is simply “those were good words”. Even simple words hit hard when meant sincerely.

    Would recommend the book series (First Law trilogy)!

  • Ertain@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I’ve been talking like that for years. So instead of saying, “Dallas’ blue bonnets”, you could say, “The blue bonnets of Dallas”.