Jeez…I know ACAB, but in this case, I’ll allow myself to be stopped and frisked all day long.
I’m not entirely sure all cops are anti-Luigi. I work at a health insurance company and it’s sort of an open secret there is a sizable number of us on his side.
Healthcare is complicated. Private health care does not solve a single goddamn problem. But there are degrees to how bad it has to be and fuck if United didn’t go out of their way to make it worse.
I was afraid to upvote and get banned, but then I remembered that I’m not on Reddit ;)
Live, Love, Luigi
That officer is a named character. Her importance will be revealed during the big twist of this arc.
Acquit him already!
what a fucking chad
I hope he gets off cos I’m about to 😩
His trial is still ongoing but you’re guilty and going to horny jail
lmao
He’s thinking about the millions of lives he improved.
About that. The CEO he shot was actually in hot water with Blackrock, who were functionally his bosses, for not doing enough to screw over people. Blackrock owns many insurance companies. So that was like 1% progress on solving a problem. Until you get your IRA/401k divested from Blackrock and stop shopping at Blackrock owned companies (good luck), you can shoot all the CEOs you want. Blackrock will still instruct their employee to screw you over.
He also shielded the actual guy who shot Thompson. I hope the actual assassin lived a long, comfortable, and quiet life.
Lived? It was like a year ago, can’t have been much of a long life.
If that past tense is accurate, then it’s a no for long.
Allegedly. Idk how he could have done it without any of our 180 friends we’ve been hanging out with noticing.
181
My ancestors are smiling at me, imperials, can you say the same?
What’s this from?
Skyrim
The place or the game?
You’re never gonna believe this…
Yes
Mangione might be the richest person Lemmy loves.
It’s either him or Taylor Swift.
He’s also a Musk fanboy and rails about the “woke mind virus”.
Which is interesting, if Luigi is conservative, does he oppose universal healthcare?
You’re on the wrong website buddy.
any citations for that? or…?
We get it, no one is pure enough for you.
Why did you stop at Musk. Why not Hitler?
He violently opposes getting screwed over by somebody. You know, like, I don’t know… somebody in the mafia might.
Someone should run for the governor of NY on a platform of offering Mangione a full pardon.
They would win in a landslide.
Mamdani won already, but Mamdani needs to also just pardon Luigi as a gesture of fuck you to private insurance.
He’s a mayor. Mayors can’t do that.
Then I stand corrected. But if and when (and I am really hoping here) Luigi goes free I want Mamdani to at least shake his hand.
yeah because we don’t have enough islamophobia
I think we should make owning the conservative fascists a point. They have always been accusing anyone opposed to them of doing this shit even if we didn’t. Why not give them a well earned fuck you?
there are people who can afford to do it and people who cannot. minorities know this very well. mamdani represents multiple minorities whether he wants to or not. he cannot do this.
Mamdani won the mayoral election. Kathy Hochul is the governor.
That isn’t how government works.
If government ‘worked’ then nothing Trump has done would have been done. It turns out you can just do stuff.
That’s not how this works. A mayor can’t pardon someone for state crimes.
How does government work ?
What makes you think a mayor can pardon state level charges?
Nothing in particular. Note that I am not the person you replied to originally. I found that your message did not offer an alternative after shutting off the presumption (that Mamdani had that kind of power), so I am encouraging you to suggest one
He should run then call the trial a political which hunt
I somehow doubt that. I understand people think the healthcare companies were shite, but most people don’t believe vigilante murder is fine
When justice no longer serves the people, the people must serve justice.
That’s what the news kept reporting.
It’s not the reaction I was seeing, in person or online.
Does ACAB include butterfly baddie in the background?
Yes, she too. Stay strong brother.
I’m weak, comrade
weren’t we all, laying eyes on that picture
But, that hair 😍
Why does this look like a porn parody of itself?
bow chicka wow wow
Nespresso ad parody of itself.
I know Luigi is just the third Franco brother I just can’t prove it
So THAT’s why he got set up! The truth about the omnious third Franco was never supposed to come out!
He looks like the love child of Dave Franco and Baker Mayfield
No matter what happens, what ruling, what transpires, they can’t bring that piece of shit he (supposedly) shot back from the dead. He’s got a lot to smile about.
Aren’t they obligated to see to his medical needs so long as he is being detained?
As in, maybe he’s smiling because (ironically) the medical care he was being denied by insurance companies while not incarcerated now has to be provided for by the state?
There’s lots of red tape and forgetting, not to mention simply not responding to them as if a nurse was walking by a hospital room with the call light on, that can be done. There are numerous articles out there about diabetics going into comas because they were denied the insulin their family had for them in the prison lobby, individuals who were seizing being ignored, people with broken bones being thrown into general pop, etc. etc.
I wouldn’t count on getting better care. You might, but you might not.
I’ve heard loads of stories of people denied healthcare help while incarcerated. But I believe they are obligated
I’m so glad we have actual freedom of speech on Lemmy
No fucking auto-mods to ban us for mentioning a person’s name because it hurts advertising revenue
Also I don’t think there’s a jury in the entire United States that would actually convict Luigi
I’m so glad we have actual freedom of speech on Lemmy
Eh…
Have to go to .ml to properly comment about american imperialism and other things that jordan doesn’t like.
Have to go anywhere but .ml (except slurping up more of that .world slop) to properly criticize china, russia, or north korea.
Have to go to hexbear to see my pig shit on pig balls.
Have to go to tiny, one user communities to see insane harry potter fan fics…
What is this world coming to? Why can’t I have it all? Free speech? 6/10, provides a minimum, but could be better. Would use again.
Idk man. We got about 1/3rd of the country gleefully supporting actual child rapist Donald Trump
I mean, have you kinda ignored the whole of US politics? Finding 12 people that will have him killed is easy.
you could probably find 12 people to execute him just because he’s Italian.
Yeah exactly. I’m not as optimistic. But hopefully his lawyer doesn’t let the prosecution stack the jury.
Didn’t his legal defense fund pass $1 mil? I’d think it wouldn’t be that hard to avoid letting that happen in NYC.
I don’t know enough about high profile cases like this to know if one mill is a lot or not though. I feel like it’s not but I have no idea.
Good thing we thought of that already (250 years ago or so) and don’t let the prosecution just pick whoever they want to be on the jury.
Here, have a read: https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/jury-selection-criminal-cases.html
I’m mistaken, then, sounda as well thought out as the rest of the US system, like the winner-takes-all “democracy.”
Man, those guys 250 years ago were so smart! Like so smart you should never ever do anything differently than they’d do it.
It’s a pretty bedrock part of every nation with trials by jury that the accusers don’t get to unilaterally select the jury. “Finding 12 people that will have him killed” would as you said, be easy. So would finding 12 people that would not. That’s why the prosecution and the defense are given equal powers to appoint and reject jurors, in a process that sometimes goes on longer than the actual trial.
It’s interesting to me to note the differences in jury selection between the US and Australia: here in Aus (at least in my state of NSW) both sides get to strike jurors, but there isn’t a round of questioning - it’s purely based on physical appearance - and each side only gets three challenges (per accused person). That means for most trials, those with only one defendant, at least six of the original randomly selected jurors will end up serving.
I’ve done jury service twice - once I was part of the original 12 and wasn’t challenged, and the other time I replaced the last challenged juror but each side only ended up challenging two.
I feel like not being able to question jurors and having limited strikes makes the system far more random and, therefore, more just in terms of the jury being a random selection of citizens.
That is really interesting the differences there. I think the intended goal of the US system is to make sure that you get 12 people capable of being objective about the subject at hand, rather than 12 random people. For example, it usually takes all 12 jurors to make a conviction, so if you get just one person who won’t convict no matter what because of religious reasons or pre-existing biases or whatever, then automatically you have a hung jury that can’t be swayed by evidence. So the US system tries to insure we get 12 people who are willing to put aside their biases and be objective (enough) to render a verdict based on the facts before them either way the facts lead. So it’s a long process, but in our system anyway we try to weed out anybody who might believe, for example, that all Mexicans are criminals if it’s a Mexican on trial, or someone who doesn’t believe that rape should be a crime in a rape case. And the big one of course, people who are already so convinced by media they’ve consumed that the person is guilty that they can’t act as a fair juror.
Yeah, it seems clear that the goals are different and so the methods of selection have to be different in order to try to achieve those goals. I wonder if there are any statistics available to determine what approach results in more accurate results in terms of convictions! Personally I see the merit in both approaches, and potentially in other approaches to the jury selection process.
Also I don’t think there’s a jury in the entire United States that would actually convict Luigi
Is he that good looking?
lemmy.ml joined the chat
Never been banned by an .ml mod. Now .world? Some real psychos there.
Neither did I. I went ahead and banned their instance before they ban me. 😉😉
I recieved both a ban and a death threat from a .ml mod.
My opinion was that Harris would have been better than Trump. I even included that I didn’t even like her or the democrats. I just view them as, unfortunately, the better option right now.
They told me I should be executed and thrown in a pit with the rest of the garbage (ie the other people they view as undesirable) and promptly banned. It was a crazy escalation
Can you share their comment/message?
.ML needs to be exposed further as too many people defend them because they don’t realise how scum they are.
.ml is a shit hole and bans more than any other instances.
I even remember seeing evidence how the admins have altered modlogs before to hide what they do.
I’ve had the opposite experience. I was mobbed and then site-banned by .ml for mildly criticizing communism in China and defending my opinion. But the hateful, rule-breaking comments, the derision, the incivility–all of that stayed up right where it was.
If you say someone bad specifically about russia or china, .ml mods are likely remove your comments.
You talk about healthcare ceos or nazis and you risk getting moderated here.
lol lemmy.ml wouldn’t ban someone for posting about Luigi, are you being for real right now?
Maybe not Luigi specifically, but freedom of speech on ml is… questionable.
I agree, although I feel like that’s across the board for Lemmy. Mods aren’t all joining together and discussing the rules they will enforce. Every community has its own idea of how moderation works, and we all do what we see fit or please. I’ve seen some stupid shit on the modlogs everywhere, often using the ban and remove content feature that essentially scrubs the user’s history, which imo should be fixed.
I do feel like .ml takes that to an extreme, though. Like, what do you mean you can’t criticize Russia or China without being banned by an admin? Dessalines is especially guilty of this, and the other admins deflect and defend his behavior.
Have they banned you yet for being obsessed? They should.
Thanks for proving their point.
What are you talking about?
User was banned for this comment
A ban from .ml is a badge of honor.
